Education Immigration & Justice National Politics

The Legality of Dreaming

the-dream-act-2.gif

A year or so ago,
when I was researching a story about low-scoring Jefferson High School, I happened to meet with some of the student leaders who were working with a group of activist faculty members in an effort to shake some help out of the district for their troubled campus. One kid in particular impressed me. He was a 12th grader, skinny, loaded with energy. Not a handsome kid per se, but winning. The kid—I don’t remember his name, but let’s call him Jaime—had a great smile, tons of charm, and an ability for smart and interesting patter. His teachers assured me that he was intelligent, but I saw that without being told. Since Jaime was a senior, I asked him what he intended to do when he graduated. What I meant, was where did he plan to go to college? At the question, his smile faltered. He wasn’t really sure, he said, he was still trying to make up his mind. Then he changed the subject.

A few minutes later, his science teacher took me aside. “Jaime doesn’t have papers.”

Oh. Right. Of course. How stupid of me not to realize.

It’s a story that I seem to be hearing more and more lately. When the subject came up last quarter in my UC Irvine class, I was surprised to find that nearly every student in the room had some friend with a similar dilemma. And, the more education reporting I do, the more kids I run across with situations just like Jaime’s.

He’d been in the U.S. since he was three. His parents had entered illegally. But now he was seventeen, and exactly the kind of student that a string of colleges would be delighted to accept. And certainly Jaime was the kind of bright, personable, self-starting kid whom anyone with any sense would want to nurture and encourage.

But because we live in a country that can’t make up its mind about its immigration policy, we act as a magnet for people like Jaime’s parents. To put it more plainly, several segments of our economy are addicted to the cheap labor such immigrants provide. But, when the best and the brightest of the children of these bargain-basement workers want to go to college, we do our best to ignore the issue—nevermind that these are kids who, more often then not, have known no other country but this one from the time they were infants or toddlers.

And this is not, by the way, a small matter: According to most estimates, around 65,000 undocumented immigrants graduate from American high schools each year. Forty percent of those kids are in California.

Enter the Dream Act
—which is about to be introduced (again) by Senator Dick Durbin, this time as an amendment to the annual defense spending authorization bill.

For those unsure about the content of the act,
the LA Daily News has this summary:

Under Durbin’s bill, anyone who entered the U.S. before age 16 and lived in the country at least five years and has a high school diploma could apply for legal status.

Over the next six years,
the applicant would have to spend two years in college or in military service before becoming qualified for legal permanent residency and, ultimately, citizenship.

The bill is expected to make it easily through the senate, with such supporters as John McCain and other Republicans.

After that, there will be problems. Our failed immigration policy has become THE flash point issue of the moment. As a result, those opposed to the issue are already doing all they can to rile up the crowds with shrieks of “back-door amnesty” and “anchor adults”—which studiously ignores the cost—moral and fiscal—of leaving these kids in the shadows.

While I was writing this post, I happened to notice a remarkably sane Op Ed in the LA Times by Douglas McGray, a UCLA instructor who has had his own experiences with promising kids who are trapped by their immigration status. His example is a girl named Lucia who was “…voted queen of her high school prom and named valedictorian of her graduating class. She had a plan. She wanted to enlist in the Marines, go to college and apply to work for the CIA — she liked spy movies.”

But, then in her senior year in high school, as Lucia was making excited plans for her future, she learned the realities of life for a girl with no papers.

Illegal immigration is a complicated problem. Lucia’s parents broke the law to come here. Eventually Congress is going to have to decide what to do about them and millions of others like them. But Americans don’t punish children for the sins of their parents, and in this case, we share some responsibility. We have spent the last 20 years mostly ignoring our broken immigration system. While we dithered and delayed, kids were growing up.

At UCLA, I’ve met undocumented students
who were brought to the United States as infants, and others who arrived so long ago that English is the only language they speak without an accent. It makes no sense to deport these kids now — and realistically, we won’t, not more than a handful. It makes just as little sense to keep them here in illegal, unskilled jobs.


Every year, thousands of our nation’s brightest and best students
graduating from high school find that the path to decent jobs and the doors of higher education and the military are essentially shut tight against them for one reason alone: They lack legal immigration status because as young children, they were brought to this country by their parents.

And if you’re willing to hear one more perspective on the matter—but delivered in a way that’s entertaining, quirky, poignant, and informative— listen to this NPR story produced by another kid who, like the Lucia and Jaime, longs to have the chance to succeed in the country that is, for all practical purposes, the only home he’s ever known.

And then, after you listen, think for a minute: Do we really want to continue with a policy that results in 65,000 dreams deferred yearly.

I believe Langston Hughes
had something to say about the wisdom of continuing down that particular road.

20 Comments

  • Well if he wants to go into science or engineering we’d be fools not to help. Course if he’s going to become another of the 55% of Amerrican college students who major in business . . .

  • Oh, Celeste. This is such a huge issue. Where I live there is a move afoot to deny kids who were born in the US, and have lived in this state all their lives, in-state tution at our state colleges and universities if their parents aren’t ‘legal.’ It makes me crazy to think that we’ll offer special visas and exceptions to meet the STEM needs of business and industry, but we seem to have an aversion to educating kids who were actually born here. It’s called cost shifting. We’ll import the skills we prefer, educated by some other country, and strangle our internal human capital… human capital, by the way, which isn’t leaving anytime soon. For the kinds of kids you describe in California, it’s a real catch-22. It makes no sense not to squeeze every bit of productivity, at the highest level the person is willing and able to produce, in this country. We need their energy and their drive. We’ll save a penny, and lose a pound-sterling every minute we deny them the opportunity to achieve.

  • We also don’t need more ambulance chasing lawyers or most lawyers for that matter. Ok Lawyers fire away if you wish.

    If they want to be engineers or scientists we give them first priority for student visas. No new radical laws need to be pased just change who gets first shot at the student visas.

  • Ric, you may actually have hit on something valid: if these kids choose a field of study in which our country is under- served and determined as “needed” in some verifiable way, then maybe they could get exemptions along the lines of foreigners brought in under special visas. Of course, those brought in as adults can hit the ground as productive, but still, giving kids who are here anyway a chance is a reasonable tradeoff, to having them spend their lives on the margins of society.

    As for the rest of Celeste’s comment, I am for one, opposed to giving illegal kids (their fault or not) scholarships to attend college, as Gil Cedillo would like. But I don’t think there is anything to keep them out of attending college or cummunity college; the issue is their getting financial aide. And with so many kids born to Americans in need of these limited funds, they need that help, first. I’m concerned about kids of immigrants in general, of any race, because their parents are often not inclined to support their kids’ college ambitions, leaving them to scramble on their own to get in to the best schools they can and for financial aid. (I was one of those kids.) Then you have the kids of coal miners and auto workers, who’ve never even thought they could go to college, and need counseling and financial help. Isn’t the kid whose parents urge him into a “good union job” in a blue-collar field, just as much lost potential?

    Even middle-class kids of white collar parents have serious problems. The Ivies and other expensive private schools cut off financial aid at a family income of about $60,000/yr, a figure that hasn’t changed significantly in over a generation. With tuition and costs ove $40,000/yr., that means that the lucky kids who get in face a cruel dilemma when it comes to paying for it. They and their families are advised to take out an equity loan, if that is available to them. Every form of family and student borrowing is on the table, sinking the whole family into major debt for years, even pushing them to the edge and wiping out any security the parents had counting on, and students are offered on-campus jobs at meager wages to help make ends meet. Some decide to postpone entrance and try to separate financially from their families for a year or two to qualify as independent, but that is very tough and requires being removed from joint family assets, etc. There are many risks.

    (I’ve worked as an alumni counselor for kids to my own Ivy alma mater, and it breaks my heart to have to present the kids with these options. Many end up going to cheaper and less prestigious colleges, after the realities set in.)

    The Durbin bill sounds like a reasonable start, giving kids born to illegals a chance to work towards legal status by joining the military or going to college. But the problems with pursuing a college education are wider and deeper than just them, and the whole picture has to be taken into account.

  • Maggie, you bring up such an important issue and laid it out very well—which is the high cost of education generally even for middle class kids. Especially for middle-class kids in that they’re less likely to get scholarship money.

    It really, really sucks.

  • Supposed journalist Celeste Fremon will probably want to visit my name’s link and take a look at some of the puff pieces highly similar to McGray’s essay that have appeared over the years. In most cases they follow a highly similar structure; the next entry after the one linked reveals one of these articles in pre-processed form.

    Then, Fremon might want to try her hand at some journalism and look into the downsides of the DA. In addition to a nearly unlimited amnesty, it also would allow foreign citizens who are here illegally to take college discounts from U.S. citizens.

    In other words, U.S. citizens would get the shaft. It’s a direct attack on U.S. citizenship, and if Fremon has any pretense towards journalism she might want to mention that.

  • Hmmmmm, which regular reader would make a comment such as
    “Then, Fremon might want to try her hand at some journalism and look into the downsides of the DA. In addition to a nearly unlimited amnesty, it also would allow foreign citizens who are here illegally to take college discounts from U.S. citizens.”

    Knock on “wood” I don’t have Dr. Watson addressing me with such a tone.

  • I think it would be great to let these students go to college and become citizens, but under ONE CONDITION.

    DEPORT TEN ILLEGAL ALIENS for each bright wonderful student that we legalize and pay tens of thousands for their college.

  • Maybe Jaime’s parents should have thought about this problem when they came here illegally.

    Celeste, do you have any outrage at all that the Democrats are trying to sneak “Dream Act” through as an amendment to the defense authorizaion bill?

  • Celeste, do you have any outrage at all that the Democrats are trying to sneak “Dream Act” through as an amendment to the defense authorizaion bill?

    I love sneaky Democrats who can keep the Marines in Iraq so they can save the Iraqi people and getz me sum skoolin.

  • Maggie says, without citing any authority, “The Ivies and other expensive private schools cut off financial aid at a family income of about $60,000/yr.”

    Maggie, my son is a senior at Harvard. He has gotten financial aid all four years, in the form of grants, loans, and work-study. Our family income exceeds $100,000 a year, and has been at that level for all of his four years at Harvard.

    My point is not that we have no financial burden for his education; we do (our out-of-pocket is over $20,000 a year). My point is only that Maggie ought not to make blanket statements of ostensible fact about which she clearly knows nothing.

  • Bob, taking out loans for someone who earns over 100K/yr is probably no “burden” on someone who can easily pay the other 20K out of pocket, and who has only one kid in college and has no other obligations, maybe assets you can count on. That’s not getting scholarships or non- loan financial aid for someone who is truly middle-class, with a family income of maybe 80 K and just modest retirement savings. Your snotty comment d/not deserve a full answer. What I “know nothing” about is based on personal experience working w/ applicants and the packets of materials I get from the University. All of the Ivies have a standard method of computing financial need and offering resources. I’m sure the many, many kids who struggle to get into my college and have to end up at a state school for financial reasons would appreciate your snotty smugness.

  • Maggie, what you SAID was this: “The Ivies and other expensive private schools cut off financial aid at a family income of about $60,000/yr.” I pointed out — on the basis of my own personal experience, gleaned over the last 4 years — that this is simply incorrect: my family income is well over $60,000, and Harvard did not “cut off financial aid.” Nor is the financial aid solely in the form of loans: as I noted, it is a combination of loans (to my son, not to me), work-study, and grants.

    Nor is your assumption correct that I can “easily pay the other 20K out of pocket”; $20K may seem like chump change to you, but let me assure you that it’s a burden.

    As to the assertion that “All of the Ivies have a standard method of computing financial need and offering resources”: another unsupported assertion.

    I regret your interpreting my questioning your knowledge as “snotty smugness.” The point remains: you ought not to make statements of ostensible fact when you do not have complete knowledge of the facts underpinning the statements. If that’s “snotty smugness,” so be it.

  • So be it indeed. And I’m sure all my would-be students would be glad to hear from you how there is no middle-class financial aid problem — again, loans and work-study are not outright “gifts” of aid. It’s just bizarre to assert, again, that it’s “another unsupported assertion” that all the Ivies don’t have a standard — that they agreed on, so that students can make a determination on which of their group of schools to attend, without having to separately wait for every school to come up with its own financial aid package. I’m doubting at this point that you even have a student at Harvard, that you’re not just making some sort of boast that it’s no hardship for you, so it’s no hardship for others in the real middle brackets, then. If only your “snotty smugness” were true, then the middle class wouldn’t be a group disproportionately forced into state schools, being neither rich nor poor enough for the expensive schools.

  • Bob,
    You ARE paying the FULL cost of the education at Harvard if you are paying 20K. That is how much it costs. The rest is for the suckers who pay retail since money is no object.

  • That nice kid at the high school’s parents screwed up his future when they snuck him into the United States illegally. Lots of kids have criminal parents; this one’s chose to make him criminal, too. When he graduates from high school, he’ll be old enough to choose to remain here as in illegal immigrant, or go to his native country and make a difference there. Life hands us some pretty sad choices. His parents made his for him, but it’s not the responsibility of the American people to correct it.

    And it should be pointed out that with all this “brightest and best” rhetoric, the illegal immigrant who benefits from the DREAM Act would only have to go to a community college for two years in order to be on his/her way to citizenship. Not exactly a huge challenge.

  • I think the drean act is very important to the imigrants because its a hope for them to do something important to their lives like all the other people. I support the dream act because its usufull to people and some people deserve to have a chance.

Leave a Comment