Bill Watch

Nearing His Legislative Deadline, Governor Newsom Signs 2 Dozen Crucial Criminal and Juvenile Justice Bills

Taylor Walker
Written by Taylor Walker

On Tuesday evening, California Governor Gavin Newsom announced that he had taken his signing pen to 25 criminal and juvenile justice reform bills, including bills to boost diversion and reentry systems and expand victim services.

Gov. Newsom has until October 13, to sign or veto the bills that remain on his desk.

Here’s a rundown of Tuesday’s new laws, plus a shortlist of WLA-tracked bills that have yet to meet their fate.

Automatic Expungement Will Help Free People From Old Arrests and Certain Convictions and Free Up Court Resources

Newsom signaled his agreement with legislators that it’s time to bring automatic expungement and resentencing to California.

AB 1076 by Assemblymember Phil Ting (D-San Francisco)–in partnership with SF District Attorney George Gascón–would automatically complete expungement and resentencing processes for people convicted of eligible low-level offenses (not violent or sexual crimes), as well as people whose arrests never resulted in convictions, as long as the statute of limitations has passed.

The law, which goes into effect on January 1, 2021, was originally written to apply retroactively, which would have positively impacted millions of people who had not completed the complicated petition process currently in place. However, the new law, as amended, is not retroactive.

AB 1076 is expected to save the government thousands of dollars for each record change. On average, resentencing and expungement processes cost just under $3,800. Moving forward, a record change will cost four cents.

Diversion to Keep Families Together

Also among the most noteworthy bills Governor Newsom signed this week, was a piece of legislation that will reduce the number of parents and children separated by cell bars by boosting diversion for primary caregivers.

SB 394 would open a pathway for courts to send parents to pretrial diversion programs, instead of incarceration for certain low-level, nonviolent crimes — so that kids and their parents are not “saddled with the debilitating collateral consequences of a criminal conviction,” according to the bill’s author, Senator Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley).

Expanding Access to Key Aspects of Civic Engagement

Another collateral consequence-busting bill from Sen. Skinner, SB 310, will open up jury service to people with felony convictions, as long as they have completed supervision and are not sex offenders. Currently, as many as one out of every three black men are disenfranchised in California due to prior felony convictions. Speaking before the Senate Public Safety Committee in April, Alameda County Public Defender Brendon Woods advocated for SB 310’s passage, stressing that opening up jury service go a long way toward addressing the fact that people of color accused of crimes often must go before juries in which “no one who sits in judgment looks like [them].”

(ACA 6, a related measure to address a collateral consequence of incarceration that blocks 50,000 people from a crucial aspect of civic engagement — voting — was pushed through to the 2020 legislative session. If the Senate passes the bill with a 2/3 majority next year, California voters will be given the opportunity to open up voting rights to thousands of people on parole in the state.)

More Criminal Justice Data on the Way

Criminal justice data collection and research are about to get a much-needed boost, thanks to the passage of AB 1331, the “Criminal Justice Data Improvement Act.”

Asm. Rob Bonta and San Francisco District Attorney George Gascón, who partnered on the bill, introduced AB 1331 in response to an April report from Measures for Justice and the Stanford Criminal Justice Center. The report revealed how difficult it is, even for researchers, to access criminal justice data in California–data that is full of glaring gaps that “limit the ability of researchers, policymakers and the public to assess criminal justice policies, especially critical during the current period of reform.”

Supporting Domestic Violence Victims and Other Crime Survivors

On Monday, Newsom signed a hugely significant bill for domestic violence survivors. SB 273, authored by Sen. Susan Rubio (D-Baldwin Park) and actress Evan Rachel Wood, a domestic abuse survivor, extends the current statute of limitations for victims to report domestic violence from three years to five years. This new deadline is an especially big deal in that it gives traumatized survivors more time to heal and get safe before they pursue justice. (WLA will have more on this critical bill in the coming days.)

The next day, the governor enacted several additional crime survivor bills. One of those bills, SB 375, authored by Sen. Maria Elena Durazo (D-Los Angeles), extends the state’s onerous three-year deadline for victims to apply for assistance from the state’s Victim Compensation Fund to seven years. (The last time WLA wrote about SB 375, the bill sought to offer survivors 10 years to apply, but the deadline was tightened to seven years through the amendment process.)

Several other victim support bills gained Newsom’s final approval, including AB 629, a bill to offer compensation to cover loss of income for human trafficking victims deprived of their liberty while being trafficked, and AB 917, which speeds up the victim certification process for survivors of crime who are also immigrants, especially if they are in removal proceedings, so that they can obtain victim-specific “T” and “U” visas.

Additionally, Newsom signed a bill to ensure that rape kits do not languish, untested in police storage. Sen. Connie Leyva’s SB 22 will require law enforcement to send rape kits to crime labs for analysis within 20 hours after the kit’s collection.

Reducing the Financial Burden of Involvement With the Criminal Justice System

One fresh, new law, AB 45, introduced by Asm. Mark Stone (D-Scotts Valley), will ban the state and local governments from charging inmates a small but often burdensome co-pay for medical visits.

A second bill, Asm. Tom Daly’s AB 1394, will abolish fees charged to individuals seeking to seal their juvenile court records.

Two more new laws will make important changes to the juvenile justice system. Asm. Stone’s AB 965 will make it possible for youthful offenders to earn an earlier parole hearing through educational merit credits. And Asm. Buffy Wicks’s AB 1423 opens a path for juvenile offenders charged as adults to request to return their case to juvenile court under certain circumstances.

Sentencing Reforms

Among the sentencing reforms green-lighted by the governor, is AB 1698, authored by Asm. Reggie Jones-Sawyer (D-Los Angeles). The bill will prohibit prosecutors from including in plea bargains a condition that would force a defendant to waive their right to resentencing or other benefits that might arise from future sentencing reform or other changes to criminal justice laws.

SB 36, from Sen. Robert Hertzberg’s office, will secure safeguards to ensure that risk assessment tools used to determine who should be released while they await trial, are not perpetuating the racial biases they are meant to eliminate. The bill will require regular analyses of pretrial risk assessment algorithms, as well as yearly reports on pretrial decision outcomes.

Two bills signed Tuesday seek to reduce mass incarceration by making small but significant dents in the state’s long list of sentence enhancements and mandatory minimum sentences.

Sen. Scott Wiener’s SB 136 eliminates a one-year sentence enhancement tacked onto a new sentence for each prior felony jail or prison term an individual has served.

Current CA law requires any person convicted of an offense related to the sale of cocaine, cocaine hydrochloride, or heroin, or to the sale or
transportation of phencyclidine (PCP), and who is granted probation by the court, to be first jailed for at least 180 days.

By signing a bill by Asm. Jones-Sawyer, AB 484, Governor Newsom chose to jettison that mandatory minimum jail sentence that unnecessarily limits judicial discretion in sentencing.

Reentry Supports

Two bills, AB 1668 and AB 278, will create an “Education and Employment Reentry Program” within the California Conservation Corps that allows the agency to enroll formerly incarcerated individuals, including people who are currently on parole.

View the full list of freshly signed criminal justice bills: here.

In addition to Tuesday’s signing spree, earlier this month, Gov. Newsom signed two bills from Asm. Shirley Weber to help exonerated Californians — who lose an average of 8.4 years of their lives to unnecessary prison sentences — successfully return to their communities.

The first bill, AB 701, will boost what an exonerated person receives upon exit from prison–from $1,000 to $1,000 plus an additional $5,000 for housing. The freed innocent person would also be entitled to reimbursement for housing costs for the next one to four years.

Its companion legislation, AB 703, will waive postsecondary education fees for wrongfully convicted individuals who meet a certain level of financial need.

These are the same benefits offered to current and former foster youth, and spouses and children of veterans killed or permanently disabled in action, as well as those of California residents killed in the 9/11 attacks.

One Reform, to Kill Justice System Fines and Fees, Is Vetoed

On Wednesday, October 9, Governor Newsom rejected a bill that would have required courts seeking to impose fines and fees on adult and juvenile defendants in criminal proceedings to determine whether each person had the ability to pay those debts (which often become the burden of defendants’ loved ones).

While Newsom said he supported the “intent” of Asm. Jones-Sawyer’s AB 927, the governor said he did not believe “requiring a hearing on defendants’ ability to pay” was “the best approach in every case.” Instead, the governor said he believed the issue should be addressed through the budget process, a task he is “committed” to carrying out.

“We must tackle the issue of burdensome fines, fees and assessments that disproportionately drag low-income individuals deeper into debt and away from full participation in their communities,” Newsom wrote in his veto message. “There are many ongoing conversations about how we can build a fairer criminal justice system while ensuring adequate funding for courts and victims’ compensation.”

Bills Still in Limbo

While the governor signed a hefty pile of criminal justice-related bills, more await his final word, including SB 42, a Sen. Skinner bill meant to reduce the number of dangerous nighttime releases from California’s jails. (Read more about it in our previous story: here.)

And if in the next week Newsom signs AB 32, he would make good on his campaign promise to discontinue the use of private prisons. The bill would ban new private prison contracts starting in 2020 and phase out their use altogether by 2028. (Currently, private prisons in California and one in Arizona hold approximately 4,000 California inmates.)

Several more juvenile justice reform bills also remain on Newsom’s desk, including SB 284, by Sen. Jim Beall (D-San Jose), which aims to de-incentivize transferring kids to troubled state lockups far from their communities, and SB 716 (Sen. Holly Mitchell), which would require court schools inside local juvenile detention facilities to offer post-secondary classes and vocational courses for youth who have finished high school.

CORRECTION: This story originally characterized AB 1076 as retroactive, an aspect of the bill that was eliminated during the amendment process.

UPDATE: This story was updated on October 11, 2019, to include Governor Newsom’s veto of AB 927, on October 9.

Image: Screenshot of the California Courts “Clean Your Record” self-help page, which points to the complicated and time-consuming process of clearing eligible criminal records, a process that will soon be automated, thanks to the passage of AB 1076.


  • When is Gov. Newsom going to sign the bill which provides free tickets to Disneyland or Sea World and a personalized gift bag to every person starting probation or parole in the Golden State?

  • Then you wonder why so many former law enforcement personnel retire out of state. This state’s laws are quickly leaning to the far left with no hope of turning it around.
    If the tax payer ever found out how much of their tax dollars are being spent in other states by former California residents.
    This state maybe has 10yrs left before the economy takes a nose dive. You can’t have 20% of the states population paying for the other 80%, you can’t have a justice system with no real consequence for bad behavior and think it can thrive. Thank God I’m out of here soon.!!!! The people of California will be paying me a lot of money every year to live in Arizona and Arizona will benefit from all of my California retirement money. I guess I get the last laugh!!!!

  • Just Saying, those 20% will be paying you “a lot of money every year.” Contrary to what you think, you are not in the 20%, you are a welfare recipient. You and your uniformed cohorts are part of the problem with the high pay and generous benefits, all for what is in essence a security guard job, and all on the government dime. I agree with you, those of us in the 20% cannot continue paying for those of us who feed off the government trough, getting pay they could never get in the private sector. And, those of us on the coasts cannot continue to pay for those in the god forsaken land between the coasts, especially the hill dwellers in the south. As you no doubt know, California sends out more to the federal government than it receives and just about the entire South receives more than it sends. We are providing the welfare that pays for the meth and Oxycontin.

    Also, it is all relative. It may seem like a move to the far left, but that is only because we were so far to the right. This was, after all, the land of Ronnie and Pete Wilson, the land of Prop 187 and 209, the land of 3-strikes. For years we sent people to prison for drug offenses, some for offenses that involve drugs that are now legal. And, all it did was provide more slop for the correction and law enforcement officers to feed off when at the government trough. The pendulum swings, my friend.

    I bid you farewell, good riddance and I send my regards to the desert dwellers, including Sheriff Arpaio, in the sun-baked state of Arizona, which, by the way, is predicted to turn blue during your retirement. Make sure you leave some water for the migrants crossing the Arizona desert on their way to California. I think we get the last laugh.

  • Where does simian CF get this crap. It’s always talking about the “big fat pensions” law enforcement gets. It has a an unnatural preoccupation, fascination with law enforcement officers and their salaries. Shame on it for not having a job that offers such a big fat pension. It forgets about all the holidays missed, physical wear and tear and sacrifice most LEO’s go through before they retire. Many die shortly after retirement.

    Simian CF, remember all the folks in power you love and put so much faith in like Governor Nutjob Newsome (your BFF), Nasty Nancy Pelosi, former LACO Probation Chief Terry MacDonald, Shipshater Shifty Schiff, BOS and many other high salaried government workers are all “public servants” that have, and continue to milk the state and it’s taxpayers dry. Or as stated before, is your hate, ire, disdain and outright jeoulsy strictly reserved for the low level employees and not the “public service aristocracy”.

    You are a moroon.

  • Poor little cf, all those college loans and that sweet pan African gender studies degree and she still doesn’t make half what they pay cops. She absolutely hates having serve cops coffee and to make matters worse they don’t even notice her cool new tattoos! The way they spend all their time chatting up the prettier baristas just proves how awful they are.

    Cry all you want about cops cf, the public wants cops and is more than willing to pay someone else good money to do the job. The more liberal the city, the higher the pay.

  • Sounds like cf is just upset they didnt make better life choices to become a LEO. I think cf is jealous that they cant eat from the government trough like they complain about all the time. Cf is just a jealous hater.

  • Cf u amaze me!! Little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Arizona is not all desert, but if you took the time to research things before you speak you would have known that northern Arizona has a climate just a little different than Southern California. All four seasons with a little snow 12” over 3 months.

    As for over paid and fat pensions, I would argue that if it wasn’t for LEO people like you would have nothing! The big mean criminal would just take everything you far left have and when you dial 911 guess what? That’s right no one would answer the phone.

    I have read many of your post and have stayed silent because I learned a long time ago that you can not reason with people who just hate and refuse to educate themselves.

  • cf – Being a police officer is a far cry from being a security guard. Go educate yourself regarding police training. Oh that’s right, you don’t really want to do that – you just want to blow smoke. Your uncivilized rants suggest that you are nothing more than a supercilious bigot.

  • Well, your prediction is here and COVID-19 made sure of it. California economy has hit a wall. I recall some folks teased people who were county employees. Now it’s seems county workers are still working and fortunate retirees smart enough to leave the high cost of living in California for greener pastures is a win win. Greed will destroy an economy.

Leave a Comment