Must Reads

Friday Wrap Up: Drugging Kids, Health Reform, the LAPD and More



AMERICAN JUVENILE FACILITIES NEEDLESSLY DRUGGING LOCKED-UP KIDS, INVESTIGATION SAYS

In a year-long investigation that has unpleasant resonances of One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, Youth Today has uncovered a pile of evidence that kids incarcerated in American juvenile facilities are getting anti-psychotic drugs intended for bipolar or schizophrenic patients— when they have not been diagnosed with either disorder (or anything close).

Only 16 out of the 50 states responded to YT’s requests for information. California was one of those that did not, although there is much anecdotal indication that LA County’s juvenile probation facilities are using anti-psychotics on kids simply as a way to make them easier to handle.

“Fifty years ago, we were tying kids up with leather straps, but now that offends people, so instead we drug them,” says Robert Jacobs, a former Florida psychologist and lawyer who now practices psychology in Australia. “We cover it up with some justification that there is some medical reason, which there is not.”

Find the rest of the report here.


ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER SIGNS AB 12, EXTENDING FOSTER CARE ‘TIL AGE 21

Here’s a clip from the story in the Wall Street Journal:

…The new benefits “will ensure our foster youth have access to important resources as they transition into adulthood,” Mr. Schwarzenegger said. Previously, benefits ended at age 18 or 19.

Because a federal law enacted two years ago helps pay for such an extension and other foster-care services previously borne by the state, California—which faces a $19.1 billion budget deficit for the fiscal year ending in June—doesn’t expect to incur any additional costs.

California now will provide housing to young adults or allow them to stay with foster parents. They would need to meet certain conditions to qualify, such as attending college or working. Generally, a foster family gets a monthly payment from the state for food, clothing and other costs for each child in its care.

Emily Villas, a 20-year-old college student in Oakland, Calif., was in foster care for four years as a teenager. After she “aged out” of the system, she became homeless. “I was just not ready to be let go of,” she said. The extension of foster care “definitely would have helped me to be better equipped.”

New York and Illinois have enacted similar foster-care laws, but child-welfare advocates have closely eyed California because it has the most foster children. About one seventh of the nearly 424,000 U.S. foster children were in California as of last year.


GOVERNOR ALSO SIGNS TWO KEY HEALTH CARE BILLS

Although the big biz interests pressured Arnold mightily to veto SB 900 and AB 1602, to his great credit, he stood tough and signed two bills that will greatly enhance how the nation’s new national health care reform act is applied in California..

The Sacramento Bee has the story:

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has signed two key health bills that make California the first in the nation to begin establishing its own health insurance exchange – a key component of the federal health overhaul law intended to widen access to health coverage among the country’s millions of uninsured.

“For national reform to succeed, it will be up to the states to make it work, and California is moving forward on reforms that will provide affordable and quality health care insurance,” the governor said in a statement.

Well done, Arnold, on all three.


JOE DOMANICK FIGURES OUT THE LESSONS IN THE WESTLAKE SHOOTING FOR THE LAPD

In The Crime Report, Joe Domanick wrote a thoughtful and informed analysis of the shooting of Manuel Jamines, which he calls “he first crisis faced by the city’s new police chief,” and “a hard challenge to the reformed LAPD’s community policing strategies.”

Here’s how it opens:

Not that long ago, I joked with LAPD Chief Charlie Beck about his success in keeping the department out of the headlines—always an accomplishment for a big-city chief. Then came the September 5, officer-involved shooting death of Manuel Jamines, in Westlake, just west of downtown Los Angeles.

Read the rest.


LOOKING FOR SOMETHING TO DO THIS WEEKEND? GO SEE WAITING FOR SUPERMAN

Some are likening it to an An Inconvenient Truth, except that this documentary is about the U.S. education system and packs a very different kind of emotional punch.

Here’s how the Washington Post review opens:

Many documentaries make you cry. They often present seemingly insolvable problems. But “Waiting for ‘Superman,’ ” filmmaker Davis Guggenheim’s scathing, moving critique of American public education, makes you actually want to do something after you dry your eyes….

7 Comments

  • I know how to deal with the educational system. When my kid gets bad grades, I march right down to the school and threaten to complain about the teacher to the school principal. If my kid’s grades don’t come up, I threaten the principal with complaints to the distict. By that time, the grades start coming up. System is what it is. It’s up to you to work it. The beauty of all of this is: The teachers will get blamed in the long run for low scores on state exams. Bust the teachers unions! Whoot whoot!

    Jerry Brown!

  • Apparently there’s a fundamental problem with Waiting for Superman – it doesn’t share the fact with its audience that charter schools are totally a mixed bag, just like all public schools, and that measured achievement at charters is no better than in regular public schools on average.

    I’m a supporter of charter schools and no great fan of the TUs in the context of their lagging in support of innovation and cracking down on a glut of ineffective teachers in many districts. But check out this review, as counterpoint to all of the glow. Frankly, when Joe Scarborough – who is about as credulous and shallow on this issue as they come – started praising “Superman” effusively I got suspicious that it was an example of a documentary filmmaker falling in love with his “narrative” at the expense of a more complicated picture.

    Anyway, for an in-depth review that doesn’t simply march to the, frankly, ridiculous hype this film is getting (“Morning Joe” Special, Oprah, Tom Friedman, Time Special Issue, ad nauseum in the Crap Feel-Good “Journalism” for Lazy, Credulous Minds Hall of Fame) check this out:

    http://www.thenation.com/print/article/154986/grading-waiting-superman

    And for the record, I’ve been involved for several years in a very successful, very seasoned and quite large volunteer program with my local public elementary school in a stereotypical “ghetto” neigborhood, so I’m not just sniping from the sidelines. I intend to see this film. I’m sure there’s some value in it’s stories of the kids. I love Geoffrey Canada. I want higher pay based on merit for teachers. Blah blah. Jerk my knee. But I also know that a lot of charters are terribly run, that a lot of good charters benefit from self-selection of those that apply in the first place, that Michelle Rhee’s imperial management style is NOT the answer (as proven by the fact that she won’t survive the recent defeat of Corey Booker, who I would have voted for but who completely blew bringing the actual people in the District along), that every district or school will NOT get access to the financial resources that are being gifted on some of the SuperHyped model programs, that unless reformers have a strategy that teachers can buy into rather than feel demonized and left dangling, this very complex, “no-easy-answers-or-silver-bullet” and “deeply-ingrained-in-rapidly-shifting-societal-and-family-dynamics” problem will not be solved. I understand too well the limitations of documentaries, but I’m getting the sense that this one went for a story line that’s vastly oversimplified to the point of distortion.

  • Appreciate the nuanced commentary on the issue, reg. I’m looking forward to seeing WFS.

    Of course, if it stirs people to positive action, I’m all for it, even if it does over simplify,

  • I’m sorry for mixing up Corey Booker and Adrian Fenty – the two young AfAm Supermayors. Booker’s Newark, and the recipient of the Gates donation, which is great. Fenty just lost his re-election bid, in which his being joined at the hip to Rhee supposedly played a part in voter disapproval. Not saying they weren’t doing many of the right things, but the public schools aren’t The Fed, the Defense Department or some such – you’ve got to be more strategic than just “my way or the highway.”

  • Apropos of nothing, I LOVE Corey Booker. I mean, obviously I don’t live in Newark, so this is an assessment made from afar, but track him a lot and I think he’s wildly cool.

    I don’t know about Rhee, I’m just now starting to try to get a fix on her. Heard some amazing stuff about the work she’s done inside DC’s juvenile facilities. Honestly, really good.

    Charters per se aren’t the answer. But good charters (and similarly semi-autonomous “small schools” strategies within the big ass, failing districts) might be.

    The self-selection thing applies certainly. But that’s why Green Dot taking over Locke HS is one of the great education stories in the nation to watch. That’s the documentary I’d like to have seen made, frankly.

    (On the other hand, I’d watch anything having to do with Geoffrey Canada, just on principle. He’s one of my personal heroes.)

    Reg, to be honest, I don’t think anybody working within education reform thinks there’s an easy fix. But at the same time, it’s not THAT impossible either.

  • Apropos of nothing, I LOVE Corey Booker. I mean, obviously I don’t live in Newark, so this is an assessment made from afar, but track him a lot and I think he’s wildly cool.

    I visit Newark a few times a year (great Portuguese and Spanish restaurants in the Ironbound and I have a brother-in-law who lives in nearby Belleville) and I can tell you that it’s night and day from when Sharpe James was mayor. E.g. during the month of March not one murder was reported in the city; the first time in 40 years. Booker is an up and comer and I believe we’ll see much more of him.

Leave a Comment