Free Speech Freedom of Information Immigration & Justice Writers and Writing

Elmore Leonard, an Immigration Raid & Homeless Violinists

Elmore-Leonard
The PEN USA Annual Literary Awards Dinner was Wednesday night.

If one is a writer (or an editor or a writers’ agent) it is fun to hang out for a night with a ballroom full of other writerly types, most of whom look distinctly startled to find themselves dressed up and away from their computers.

Among the dressed up and startled were:

Sandra Tsing Loh, who looked fetching in skinny black pants and pigtailed hair…. LA Times Op Ed editress Sue Horton who went for black button-up elegance, novelist/memoirist Aimee Liu, who had on a cunning little beaded number, and journalist Sara Catania who wore a very cool girly, frilly, sheerish thingy.

(The men looked swell too but, with a few exceptions, their accessories were less notable.)

Of course, the point of the evening was to give an array of literary awards (and to raise money for PEN’s excellent programs, like PEN in the Classroom, and others).

All the PEN awards are listed here. But memorable among them were:

Steve Lopez, who won the creative nonfiction award for his terrific book The Soloist, about his (still ongoing and daily) relationship with homeless, mentally ill and gifted violinist, Nathaniel Ayers.

The always amazing Elmore Leonard, who won the Life Achievement award, and dispensed a few nuggets of writing advice when he accepted the prize, including his now classic: “Try to leave out the part that readers tend to skip.”

(Note to my writing students: A good idea to at least consider.)

Also memorable, was the choice of Linda Ollson, of Texas Monthly, who won the night’s award for Literary Journalism for her story Before and After, about the affects of an immigration raid at the Pilgrim’s Pride Corp. in Mount Pleasant, Texas. The story is good for many reasons, among them the fact that it doesn’t grind political axes, but merely shows—through a very human lens—the giant pile of complexities and contradictions that plague America’s immigration policy.

This is about as political as Ollson gets:

…It seems disingenuous to single out individual employees or supervisors, since these sorts of dealings are the product of a de facto bargain struck years ago: Poor people from other countries will make our food under harsh conditions, enabling us to eat cheaply and conveniently. Few people want to spend much time contemplating this, so we tend to construe the fact that chicken is inexpensive as if it were a property of the meat itself, like calorie content, rather than the result of a particular economic arrangement situated in a legal and ethical gray area.

You have to register (for free) to read the whole of Ollson’s piece, but here is how the story opens:

There was a man—call him Max, the name he went by at work, or Pancho, as he was known to his family and friends, or Francisco Garcia-Rodriguez, the name recorded on his birth certificate, or Sealed Defendant 3, the title under which he would eventually be indicted by a grand jury in Texarkana. He was 37 years old and lived in the East Texas town of Mount Pleasant. A father of five, he worked in the mornings and brought his kids to the park in the afternoons. He rooted for the Pumas, a Mexico City soccer team, and took an interest in politics and current events; he was a longtime Reader’s Digest subscriber and had recently plowed through the Spanish translation of Bill Clinton’s autobiography. His job was to load boxes of frozen chicken parts onto trailers at a chicken-processing plant owned by Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, a place locals would often just call Pilgrim’s. He’d worked there for nearly twenty years.

One morning last April, Francisco arrived at the plant, as usual, a little before seven a.m. Right away he sensed that something was amiss. There were very few trailers to load, and his supervisor had a somber look on his face. Fifteen minutes into his shift he was summoned by the superintendent and informed that there was a payroll problem. He would have to go to the human resources office to resolve it. Rather than let him make his own way across the plant complex, the superintendent told Francisco he would drive him.

The superintendent, a tall, skinny white man, said nothing as they walked to his truck. Once in the cab, he asked Francisco how his kids were doing. They’re doing well, Francisco said. Moments earlier, just after he’d opened the passenger door, it had occurred to him that he could make a break for it, but the impulse hadn’t traveled as far as his arms and legs. It was as if he’d gone into shock. He already feared—all but knew—what the trouble was. He was not in the country legally. Yet he reasoned that if people were to look at his record, they’d see that it was clean, that he’d been working at Pilgrim’s for many years, that he had a family to support. He didn’t realize how bad it was going to get.

Before dawn that morning, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents had set up a base of operations in an old precinct barn on the edge of town and fanned out in a fleet of sport-utility vehicles. A detachment had established itself within the human resources office at the Pilgrim’s Pride plant, while squads of agents in black police vests, sidearms strapped to their legs, had ranged around Mount Pleasant searching for other workers, supported by state troopers and sheriff’s deputies. At a Victorian house on Third Street they rousted a young woman out of the shower with their banging and kicking, and when she declined to let them in because she was wearing only a towel, they told her to stand by her patio door while they spent the better part of an hour peering in the windows. At Productos Hernandez, a produce market, they trooped around the cartons of onions and chiles, checking the receiving area and the storage cooler and the restroom and the back office. They hit multiple houses on First Street. They surrounded a dingy little duplex at the corner of Arkansas and Lide. They questioned the owner of a Western-wear store as to the whereabouts of a Pilgrim’s employee who earlier, at the plant, had pushed his boss out of the way and fled.

The morning sunshine gave way to clouds. Parents pulled their kids from school. The priest at the Catholic church helped a parishioner’s sister-in-law sneak out the back of a house while agents cased two others on the same street. A mother and her four children took refuge with one of the kids’ science teachers. Other families hid at ranches in the country.

Francisco’s wife, Maria Garcia, was working her 2:30 a.m.-to-11 a.m. shift at a trucking company when her sister-in-law called and told her that ICE had picked up some of the workers at Pilgrim’s. Had Maria heard from her husband? She had not. She called his cell phone, but he didn’t answer. After work she picked up her three-year-old twins from school and went home.

Early in the afternoon, ten or so black-clad agents arrived at the door looking for someone she didn’t know, somebody named Cortez. She let them search the house. Maria was in the U.S. legally, so she didn’t fear for herself. Like many immigrant families, hers was composed of people with different legal statuses. Her husband was illegal, she had a temporary permit, and their children were all citizens—an ordinary enough situation that was about to make her life extraordinarily complicated.

Later on, through the open blinds on the living room window, Maria saw a friend of Francisco’s from work get out of a car holding a small black object—and knew immediately what that meant. Once the friend had left, she thumbed through the contents of her husband’s wallet—pictures of the kids, business cards, driver’s license, company lunch tickets—and then pressed it to her chest and cried. She felt half her body go numb. Still, she fixated on the notion that he might have somehow run away and gone into hiding, even after one of her sisters called and said Francisco had been on the five o’clock news, even after she drove over to her parents’ house and watched the segment on her brother’s computer. Not until Francisco called did she bury the hope that he’d escaped, along with many of the ideas she’d had about her family’s future. All that seemed to have come to an end, she would later recall: “On that day all our goals were shattered into pieces.”

Read the rest here.

10 Comments

  • “Fetching (?) in skinny black pants and pigtailed hair (sounds a little Charlie Channish to me, rebellious teenagerish maybe? Oh, Sandra, stop feeling like the guilty bad girl, it’s OK, you’ve done enough pennance)…(Horton – one of the more fairminded voices in Editorial, in) black buttoned up (?) elegance, a cunning (?) little beaded number,” and I can’t even quote the whole girly, frilly, see-through thingy with a straight face: my my, quite an eclectic bunch when they’re let out of their writing closets it would seem. I have respect for the work of all of these women and their independent voices, but somehow this description reminds me of the unpopular, less pretty “brainy girls” in high school who were forced to go to the dance by their mothers so that they “wouldn’t miss out,” and who bought some intentionally nonconformist, once-pricey and once-fashionable number, at the thrift shop.

    The guys weren’t nearly as interesting, you sure? Not even Elmore Leonard? (Who I’ve met a couple of times and he’s a strange, shy character, who seemed OK making a scripted speech or engaging in a specific topic but when forced to make small talk with one fan in particular, literally backed and peeled away from her as she was talking, slinking along the edge of the great hotel banquet room, until he reached the nearest exit, turned and fled. Hope he was more comfortable last night. Hope YOU had fun too.) I don’t want to know what Steve Lopez was wearing, come to think of it.

    I’ll leave the OTHER part, the topic of which happens to dovetail nicely into your previous immigration thread which is still on-going, to someone else!

  • WBC, this is—as I’m sure you’ve guessed–=just me being silly.

    Hey, I thought all the women looked great. Listen I was tempted to mention more (LAT’s Susan Brenneman, Nina Revoyr and Amy Wilentz all looked quite snazzy), however I knew I was already pushing the envelop of acceptable social justice blog behavior. But they are all women of whom I am very fond, so I appreciated their sartorial expressions.

    I usually take multiple photos at these things but I’m running on so little sleep this week, I simply didn’t make the effort. Then as I was writing the post, of course, I realized the gravity of my mistake.

    The guys looked fine, but without photos I couldn’t remember a single damn detail except that they wore ties, and they usually don’t when I see them otherwise, which didn’t seem like a terribly pithy observation.

    I don’t quite remember all that much about Sara’s top except that together with her necklaces and such, it was pretty and very girly.

    Actually Sandra looked cute, and definitely teenagerish. But she pulled it off.

    And, no, I don’t remember what Steve Lopez was wearing, so you’re safe. There was a tie involved, but I remember nothing else as I was distracted because we got into a discussion about “Nuch,” which I will leave to your imagination.

    Elmore Leonard was great.

    One of the hits of the night was the tiny Chinese American mommy who accepted the award for her flu ridden daughter, Leslie Chang, who won the Research Nonfiction award for what looks like a terrific book called Factory Girls. The little mommy read the daughter’s speech—complete with the part where the daughter thanked her parents. She was great. One suspected that the mommy has a wicked sense of humor.

    (And I did have fun!)

  • Celeste, I know you were being silly and I meant my comments as a compliment, actually, in that “serious writers” are much more individually and eclectically dressed, in my experience, reflecting their own personalities at least at that moment, than the perfectly made-up and coiffed people at Hollywood events where they’re always happy to tell you “who they’re wearing,” rather than who they are. I’m sure no one will be offended by what you wrote – it’s very cute, your attempt at the fashion runway thing…I’ll take your word that the rest all looked “quite snazzy” and I’m sure, Steve Lopez did too. (As for Nuch, I recall he wrote a glowing piece or two about how he’s the real-down-home simple son of a cannery worker and all that, a real San Pedro everyman with lofty ideals, but wonder if he’s seen the other side.)

    I will be interested in reading Factory Girls, although I must say, for you to describe the “tiny Chinese American mommy” as also “the little mommy” in the next sentence, one who read a thanks to herself, does sound uncharacteristic of you, but I get the sense that it somehow fits into the subject matter or you wouldn’t have mentioned it, even subliminally; I wonder how but I’ll reflect on that as I read. Thanks for sharing your candid and “cute” impressions.

    As for the immigrant story, prefaced by how “poor people from other countries make our food cheaply and conveniently,” and how we don’t much think about it: well, I do think about it, especially in connection to a country like Japan which has always chosen to go in the opposite direction, severely limiting immigration (and putting strong pressure on the few immigrants, e.g. Koreans, to “Japonise” their names and values), and being accused of protectionism and xenophobia, willingly accepting higher prices in everything from food to labor as the cost of keeping their society more homogenous and the means of production and distribution under national control. Just as another model, with most of the world falling somewhere in between. (You are really struck by it when you experience it, for example, the outrageous costs by American standards but the willingness of the Japanese people to put up with it — though there are signs that the younger generation is less willing to, and demands higher standards of living which mean cheaper goods.)

    BUT I know that this is the kind of heart-tugging story that tends to win awards from liberal writers who generally have an abundance of compassion for the human condition, apart from politics.

  • Well, if we’re talking strictly about clothing, then, yes, the men are generally a little more plain than women. If you men want to start accessorizing, by all means do so.

  • The “little mommy” description was meant to be affectionate. (It probably does look a bit strange when written.) She reminded me slightly of my own late mom. Little and unassuming looking, but very, very spunky (and funny).

    It may have been a you-had-to-be-there moment.

    Okay, back to the last batch of papers for tomorrow’s class.

    And thanks for the kind words.

  • Celeste – next time do a quick check for beautiful and/or eccentric ties and scarves. It’s all we’ve got. Except, of course, for quirky socks.

  • Speaking of topics that get one’s integrity-meter rising, Nuch and the L A Weekly (and I really DON’T like to think about either one, but to ignore them is at one’s peril), when there’s a conjoined confluence between the two to go after someone, it’s really a spectacle that Kim Jong Ile would envy. Just came across the latest Patrick Range McDonald hit piece. “Trutanich Probes Pot Backer Duncan,” coming after this paper – including these two writers and even Christine Pelisek co-signing in at least one case – did a huge “investigative report”/AKA hit piece on Don Duncan, the founder (I think I read it right) of Americans for Safe Access/ASA, accusing him of leading Reyes and some other councilmembers (pointedly singled out, so we know who the villains are of the piece, as newcomer Koretz, Hahn, Rosendahl, and even Zine) by the nose on the issue, and in effect, alleging that he’s setting city policy through them for his own profit. About how Trutanich and his laughably named “head of Ethics” David Berger, the former running-mate of Walter Moore the “Minuteman” candidate (as some call him, not fully accurately BUT he has the full support and blessing of those who support the Minutemen, like Kevin James, etc.) are now going after him.

    Sounds to me like an all-out political vendetta, supported by the media arm of Trutanich/Cooley, as many commenters believe; while many of the paper’s supporters, typical of the Moore crowd, are often downright explicitly racist and proudly so. Some critics point out that Trutanich hosted a law enforcement seminar this summer on HOW (not IF) to eradicate all MMJ dispensaries, and when the Council didn’t blindly go along with the Cooley/Trutanich edict, based on the belief that all sales not just for-profit are illegal, they were so infuriated at having their plans messed up by these inconsequential legislators, they’re beside themselves and are going after anyone who stood in their way. (Cooley was quoted in the Times as literally saying, whatever the city council decides is “so irrelevant it’s not even funny,” vowing to bust every shop in the county anyway. Including West Hollywood – where Duncan apparently owns one of the 4 shops and is a long-time activist known statewide now.)

    — For the record (NOT that I need to state a position on this), I haven’t been near a dispensary or know anyone who sells and am not a “patient” nor do I smoke pot period. (But many fully functioning people do, and legalizing it is a discussion we need to have.) I agree there are way too many shops, many seedy-sounding, badly located, etc. Many or most need to be shut down or reopened under professional management. Turning the whole pot trade BACK to the drug cartels as Cooley/Trutanich want doesn’t seem like a good alternative, though, and their demand that once a patient becomes sick, they get some seeds and wait months to grow some pot and take it to a dispensary to share, is absurd. I think Reyes and the “bad guys” enumerated here by Patrick ARE actually the ones trying to set sensible public policy.

    BUT this comes ON top of his war with Chick and Wendy Greuel over the Controller issue, where he denied them (and Jan Perry, etc.) the right to be represented against him by an attorney, alleging only he can both sue them and represent them — something Judge Mooney says is just plain wrong, according to today’s Times. He has all along chastised him and the whole council for going along with him on this. Then there’s the AEG “bullying” thing, unsubstantiated allegations of “criminal aspects” to the Jackson affair., threatening to sue the whole planning commission for not deferring to him BEFORE he even took office, etc., with the Weekly blindly supporting them on everything as their PR arm just like it AND other blogs and even ofteh the LATimes did during the election cycle, but more so (while all of the fine-sounding promises about doing public good have fallen to the wayside)…

    From a First Amendment standpoint, among others, seems to me we’ve got ourselves a situation in L A that merits a whole lot of concern and scrutiny. But NO ONE is scrutinizing him and Cooley, who backs him up and gives him the freedom to threaten to “walk you across the street to the DA,” when someone disagrees with him, as Perry and others relate. Seems to be an absence of checks and balances on these two, as they pursue their Republican agendas – the very sort of thing many people elected him to AVOID, based on the (generally false and often anti-Democrat) propaganda of some invincible “Democratic machine.” The concentration of lock-step power in these two offices, as it’s being used and threatened, is scary.

    OK, the other important topic: As for Steve Lopez’s and other men’s ties: reg is right, ties, scarves (and quirky socks), non-white shirts, are about the only permissible forms of individualism. (Hence, the whole “bow tie” thing.) BUT sometimes just a very subtly “different” shade of suit or lapel or shirt, can make that sartorial difference. It’s tricky to pull off without looking just odd, unless you’re a VERY eccentric George Will type or a very unusually handsome type like Johnny Depp. (And YIKES! he lives in France.) You’d think writers might feel a bit more leeway in these matters than say agents, but the funny thing is, most men at these events seem to try to prove how button-down traditional they can be.

  • When I said “these two writers” for the LA Weekly PLUS Pelisek, I omitted Dennis Romero as the other one besides McDonald.

    Between them they’ve done at least a half dozen articles with the same focus recently, including accusing Duncan of being an opportunistic profiteer (without proof) exerting some sort of malicious influence over Zine, Reyes & Co. – McDonald’s current hit piece which I discuss above, opens with proud acknowledgement that their stories are a basis for Trutanich and Berger’s looking into criminal aspects involving Duncan. (IF Duncan has anything to hide we need to know about it, but the pattern of unsubstantiated allegations about him from the Weekly to bear out their pre-conceived premise, and to get at those on the Council who don’t cave to them – which is then the basis for Trutanich/ Berger’s “investigation,” sets off Alarm Bells.)

Leave a Comment