At around 3:30 in the afternoon on March 13, two Franklin High School students—a 15 and a 16 year old—were shot to death on Figueroa Blvd. in Highland Park. The shooting occurred in broad daylight with scores of other kids around. The police described it as a gang related homicide. Yet it was not at all clear that the dead boys were gang members. Friends and family insisted to the contrary. One of the murdered boys, Alejandro Garcia, was even in Franklin High’s ROTC program.
Still, while there was one brief online-only mention in the LA Times about the murder, there was no follow-up. The rest of the LA media also paid scant attention.
Nine USC Annenberg journalism students decided that the murdered boys deserved better.
So they decided to cover the story themselves.
The students happened to be part of an investigative journalism class taught by my pal and colleague Alan Mittelstaedt. Since he likes students to have real world experiences as they learn, one of the subjects he suggested his class cover was the double homicide.
Yet, while the idea was initially his, it was the students, he said, who “totally embraced it.”
Class members brainstormed to determine the best angles from which the story could be covered and listed the results on the classroom white board. Then assignments were made.
Here’s what Alan told me about why the class was drawn to this particular tragedy.
What went down in Highland Park on March 13 is no more or less worthy of coverage by a team of nine reporters than any number of killings in Los Angeles. But three or four things drew us into the lives of Alejandro and Carlos: They were shot dead in the middle of the afternoon, near one of the busiest intersections of the city and the mainstream media mostly ignored it. When the police called it gang-related, as is so common, the media –and public–seem to lose interest as soon a crime is dubbed gang-related. Not this class. You should have heard some of the impassioned speeches about how the death of every teenager in this city is worthy of a story.”
Last night the first of the students’ work was posted on Annenberg’s Neon Tommy:
Kim Daniels and Shannon Pence, put together this excellent and moving portrait of one of the victims, 16-year-old, Alejandro Garcia.
….And there is this report on the police investigation, by Richie Duchon:
The investigation into the murders of two teenage boys in Highland Park in mid-March is close to being solved, the lead detective on the case said.
Alejandro Garcia, 16, and Carlos Hernandez, 15, were shot and killed Mar. 13 on busy Figueroa Street near Highland Recreation Center Park during the afternoon, just as school was letting out for the week. The shootings happened just before 3:30 p.m. when a group of suspected gang members approached the teens and an argument broke out. According to police, one of the members pulled out a gun, shot the two teens and ran away with several others…..
And this story by Samantha Page and Kevin Patra about how gangs are a fact of life in Highland Park— but not all there is to life in the community.
There is still more to come in the team portrait of a double homicide. In the meantime, I asked the two video reporters, Kim Daniels and Shannon Pence, why they thought the Highland Park murders were an important story, and how they’d been affected by the experience of reporting on the victims.
Here’s what they wrote. Be sure to click through the jump, as their response is informative and should serve to reassure you that the future of the news business is in good hands with the new young crop of reporters that these two ably represent.
Yes, there are many many murders in LA County every year — the Homicide Report was great for filling that reporting void. However, usually deaths of minors make the news in some form. So the lack of coverage begged the question as to why the murders went unnoticed… was it because the kids died in Highland Park and may have been ‘gangbangers’ and therefore supposed to die violently?
Did the death of Jamiel Shaw receive excessive coverage because he was a star athlete and college-bound and therefore not supposed to die?We wanted to know more about these kids. That is why the story mattered.
This was both Shannon and my first experience thoroughly reporting a murder. Speaking to the family of Alejandro Garcia, who desperately want their son’s killer to be found, it was difficult to balance the respect we have for their grief with needing to put together a solid story in a timely manner. Of course, we wanted to spend time with them and give them a chance to express everything they wanted to say. However, in a three minute package, you can only include so much.It was emotionally exhausting but at the same time, a great motivator to put the story together.
Saying that, we both think it would have been extremely difficult to do a story like this on a one or two day deadline – how do you tell a mother to stop talking about her son because you already have the soundbite you need?
The family thanked us for taking the time to talk with them and for putting the package together — and that felt nice. We feel like we were able to give them a place to express their feelings – even if it was only a few minutes.We were a bit surprised as to how helpful people were in connecting us with the family and friends of Alejandro. That was a very inspiring aspect of the reporting because the community cared very much about getting this story out.
However, another aspect that we are confronting as young reporters covering sensitive stories such as this are the nuances that one chooses to include and those that we chose to leave out.
The fact is we cannot confirm that what the family said is actually the truth. Alejandro’s friends told us about some events that contradicted the family’s claims.In the end, this was not an investigative piece that sought to ferret out whether or not Alejandro was involved heavily in a gang (and we don’t think he was), but rather a piece about a 16-year old that was shot and killed in broad daylight on a busy street with his friend. We wanted to give a little insight to this person’s life as a student, a brother, a friend, and a son. So, we decided to include the material that was relevant to the goal.
Making those kinds of judgement calls is not easy at this point – I’m not sure if it ever gets easier. But, it continues to surprise me when I think I can convey a lot of information in a story only to find that there may be an equal amount that I must leave out.
(Additionally, we were mindful of the information we included because we were worried about the safety of the people who talked with us. Most likely, we could have included everything and there would have been no negative consequence – but the volatility with respect to gangs in our communities is real and we didn’t want to take any chances with that.)
Kim and Shannon
****************************************************************************************************
PS: It looks like a few people are finally starting to pay attention to the murders.
Yesterday, the LA City Council voted to offer a $75, 000 reward for information leading to the arrest of the shooters.
how do you tell a mother to stop talking about her son because you already have the soundbite you need?
You don’t. It’s nice to see upcoming journalists with a conscience, as opposed to those who jam a camera and microphone in the face of a distraught parent who just learned of a child’s death and hasn’t consented to be interviewed.
– – –
the volatility with respect to gangs in our communities is real and we didn’t want to take any chances with that
Don’t blame you, but the gangs depend upon intimindation to stop investigations and witnessess. It’s a tough line to walk. Too bad that you can’t say “unnamed White House sources.”
– – –
This was a good job by the students, and it was nice for someone as mean and scowling as Alan to suggest it. Don’t let this drop, even after you get your A or the semester is over.
Wonderful, and much appreciated, finally, what journalism should be all about, necessary, fair and informative news and follow up. These USC students are to be commended for the very human face’s they were able to provide us as part of this tragedy, and the work and effort they obviously expended on this project paid off with an excellent end result. This is the kind of journalism that can make a difference in the way we think about our fellow LA neighbors of all race’s and ethnicity’s.
Bravo
I am reminded of a front page story that ran in my Joshua Tree newspaper about the murdered dog who belonged to the owners of the pioneer town motel.
A reward was raised by the community to find the dog killer.
Big cities make everything impersonal and seem far away, even the murder of two young boys.
I was thinking about DQ’s saying that the journalism students were making a difference. Normally, I don’t want to hear the students themselves say that they want to become journalists to make a difference rather than report the news fairly and accurately. So, why are they having to investigate these deaths? The next interviews should be with the police, whose job it is, to find out why they aren’t doing more–if they aren’t.
These are excellent stories and as a resident of HIghland Park, I would like to comment. My daughter attends a school very nearby the shooting.Several of her classmates witnessed the event while on a bus that was passing the incident. One student in her class was friends with one of the boys. The serious matter here is that people in the community don’t care about the gang activity around them as long as it doesn’t affect them personally. I am mostly talikg about the people that are not taregted in HP, the white community (of which I am a part). The boy that knew one of the victims is not “in” a gang but is closely associated with one. I am afraid that all the youth in this area can be affected and to be “around” the gang members makes you part of the gang and a potential victim. Gangs don’t say oh, excuse me you aren’t in a gang so please move out of the way while we kill/beat up your friend here. We need to be involved with gang prevention and keep all the kids from getting involved on any level.
To answer some rhetorical questions above…
Q. “…was it because the kids died in Highland Park and may have been ‘gangbangers’ and therefore supposed to die violently?”
A.YES, absolutely.
Q. “Did the death of Jamiel Shaw receive excessive coverage because he was a star athlete and college-bound and therefore not supposed to die?”
A. YES, absolutely.
BTW, I don’t blame you if you “moderate” (censor) my comments since it does not fit well with some of the gushing reviews above. The hard truth of the matter is we live in a city where some adults AND children unnecessarily place themselves and others in more dangerous situations by joining gangs. If these two kids were indeed gang-bangers, then I do not have much sympathy. If these kids tried their best to NOT join a gang and got killed in the process, I would have all the sympathy in the world. BTW, if more people felt like me we could make a huge dent in gangs in just one generation. Our liberal “understanding” and sensibilities to multi-culturalism do nothing but become toxic enablers for these idiot gangs. Again, if these kids were gang bangers, Darwinism did its job and eradicate a bit of societal scum.
I lived through some of the intimidation that was done in MacArthur Park area in the 90’s. It is one thing to read about gangs and another thing to witness it and be intimidated by it.
One guy I knew stood up to them many a time. Others were united together and could lessen the effect of it. When you are alone and faced with the option to fight or not will give pause in doing what other brave people think should be done.
I have been sucker punched, the old catch you off guard trick. I think the two victims may have not been alert enough and were caught off guard maybe because they were “familiar” with their murderer and were not familiar with their murderous intent.
I don’t think anyone would try to take revenge but you never know about some people and their silence.
————–
I think if the police stumble on the murderers they could solve it. But I don’t think the Police got enough priority or maybe they are working on a big sweep (that the Police are sometimes liable to do…)
Thanks for being honest in saying that you could not confirm what the family was saying. I guess the LA Times could not confirm what they were saying either.
LAPD Officers could probly have confirmed everything for you though. The truth is LAPD does not have enough resources to solve crimes. Los Angeles needs more police officers. Councilmember Ed Reyes, who was just re-elected now says he will have to cut police officers. What? Cut Police Officers when this city does not have enough?
I guess voters got what they wanted. Another air head politican. Thank God Ed Reyes is now termed out but this poor area is stuck with him for another 4 years.
Im very thankful that they did a story on them. It was nice of them to show the young, innocent Alejandro we know! It was ridiculous of the detectives to assume and tell press it was gang related then later told press they made a mistake and Alejandros death wasnt gang related.
It was great that the city and ed reyes decided to put out a 75,000 dollar reward.after all they were the ones that pointed out this was a gang related homicide. It was the least they could do.I know without that much money for a reward no one would want to testify and we wouldnt of had the witnesses there is now.
to ras ur a piece of shit if u think ppl should b killed just bc they r gang members noone deserves to get their lives taken away and carlos and alejandro deserve justice !!!!
ALEJANdRO WAS nOT A GANGBANGER!!!HE WAS A SCHOOL BOY ANd NEVER HAd PROBLEM FU#% EVERYONE WHO TALK SHIT I BET U NEVER TELL EM IN THERE FAMILY FACE THATS Y U TALK BEHINd PPL BAC SAYS ALOT ABOUT YOU