LASD

Lying LA County Sheriff’s Department Members Still Employed…and More

LA COUNTY SHERIFF JIM MCDONNELL’S FIGHT TO WEED OUT DISHONESTY

A number of Los Angeles County deputies found to have made false statements on police reports or in court testimony are still employed by the sheriff’s department. One of those deputies, Daniel Genao, wrote in a police report that a gun was in a suspect’s waistband rather than the planter into which it had been tossed.

LASD Sheriff Jim McDonnell has tried to fire deputies caught lying, but has met with resistance from the Los Angeles County Civil Service Commission, which serves county employees, functioning as the appellate body for serious disciplinary actions, suspensions, firings and discrimination complaints.

McDonnell is fighting Genao’s case and those of three other deputies reinstated by the commission, as part of his promise to weed out the dishonest.

Under former Sheriff Lee Baca’s reign, deputies often faced remedial classes, rather than suspensions for lying.

Last month, Baca, himself, pleaded guilty to felony charges of lying to federal authorities interviewing him as part of an investigation into LASD corruption and civil rights violations.

During McDonnell’s first year as sheriff, 90% of deputies caught making false statements were fired. Still, McDonnell has faced criticism for not cleaning house even more thoroughly. Yet some department members inherited from the Baca era who have lied under oath or on a report are reportedly safe from firing because of contractual protections.

And in December, a federal jury found in favor of eight Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department members who sued LA County for alleged career-damaging retaliation following the plaintiffs’ endorsement of former undersheriff Paul Tanaka during his campaign for sheriff. Most of the allegations were against Baca. But one of theplaintiffs, Robert Tubbs, accused McDonnell of wrongly demoting him for insubordination. (Read more about it here and here.)

“My question is, for someone who is proven to be untruthful or lacks integrity or committed acts of theft, insubordination, those kinds of things, where can I put someone like this?” McDonnell told the LA Times.

The LA Times’ Cindy Chang has the story of Sheriff McDonnell’s struggle for an ethical department. Here’s a clip:

Since taking office in December, McDonnell has made honesty among his 9,000 sworn deputies a centerpiece of his reform agenda. He has tightened the penalties for lying on the job, fired deputies who made false statements and is reviewing the assignments of those found to have lied in the past. Some could be required to work under special conditions, such as recording all their interactions with the public.

McDonnell’s tough approach contrasts with that of former Sheriff Lee Baca, who let some proven liars off with remedial classes. Baca himself pleaded guilty in federal court last month to lying to federal authorities and faces up to six months in prison as part of his plea agreement with prosecutors.

Establishing clear ethical boundaries is especially important as the department emerges from a period of scandal, with more than a dozen former employees convicted of crimes including lying and beating a jail visitor, McDonnell said in interviews with The Times.

He said there is no place in his department for the most egregious liars. Assigning them to desk jobs is not a solution because every deputy should be ready to testify on the witness stand, he said.

“My question is, for someone who is proven to be untruthful or lacks integrity or committed acts of theft, insubordination, those kinds of things, where can I put someone like this?” McDonnell said. “Where can I comfortably deploy people where we don’t have that level of trust?”

But to fully implement his strict regime, McDonnell must contend with the Civil Service Commission, a five-member body appointed by the L.A. County Board of Supervisors that adjudicates discipline cases of county employees. In the last year, the commission has reinstated Genao as well as a deputy who lied about whether he had tried to take a photo under a woman’s skirt and another deputy found to have falsely asserted that he had not witnessed a colleague beat up a jail inmate.

[SNIP]

Genao, the deputy who wrote false reports about the gun, said he was traumatized because of his fear that the suspect he encountered was armed. Stress and confusion, Genao said, caused him to write that he found the gun on the suspect rather than behind the planter, according to a civil service hearing officer’s report filed in court. Genao insisted that he did not intentionally lie, the report said.

The hearing officer concluded that dismissal was excessive because Genao admitted to the false statement and was a popular, well-respected deputy. Other deputies have ended up on the Brady list yet remained on the job, and Genao could work a non-patrol assignment, the hearing officer noted.

The Civil Service Commission voted to return Genao to duty with a 30-day suspension. The Sheriff’s Department has put him on leave, with pay, while it appeals.


LONG BEACH’S NEW EMPLOYMENT AND EDUCATION DIVERSION PROGRAM FOR TEENS AND YOUNG ADULTS

The city of Long Beach is launching a pilot program this month that will divert young offenders from incarceration, offering employment training, life skills instruction, job placement, education, job placement, and mentoring. The program, called Promising Adults, Tomorrow’s Hope (Path), was developed by Long Beach City Councilmember Rex Richardson, City Prosecutor Doug Haubert, and the Pacific Gateway Workforce Investment Board.

The diversion program, which will serve minor offenders between the ages of 16 and 24, was created in response to President Barack Obama’s My Brother’s Keeper Community Challenge, which called on communities to adopt initiatives to improve outcomes for young people through a “cradle-to-college and career strategy.”

Richardson pointed out that during this age range, people “are more susceptible to peer pressure, more prone to risk-taking and impulsive behavior, they’re more likely to misread social cues and dramatically overreact.” These factors can lead young people to commit crimes “which can have dire long-range consequences affecting their ability to gain employment, complete their education, and pursue a range of other important life goals,” Richardson said.

KPCC has more on the program. Here’s a clip:

“Instead of only considering traditional criminal punishment, in some cases we need to look at rehabilitative methods,” said Haubert in a press release. “Prosecutors need options like effective interventions for first-time, nonviolent offenders.”

The program uses a data-driven approach based on adolescent brain development research to steer young offenders away from prison and into programs tailored to their specific issues.

Young adults make up the largest segment of Long Beach’s population, according to PGWIN, and the 20.7 percent unemployment rate among adults 20 to 24 is more than triple the overall rate in the city. Young people in Long Beach are also more susceptible to violent crime, as 50 percent of murder victims and 43 percent of assault-with-a-deadly-weapon victims are 18 to 29, according to data from the Long Beach Police Department.


LA CITY ATTORNEY MIKE FEUER DISCUSSES PROP. 47 AND A PILOT PROGRAM TO INCENTIVIZE TREATMENT FOR DRUG OFFENDERS

Appearing on ABC7’s Newsmakers, City Attorney Mike Feuer talked with host Adrienne Alpert about efforts to get Proposition 47 working as intended by ensuring low-level drug offenders are receiving meaningful treatment. One way Feuer’s office is working toward that goal is by launching a pilot program through an LAPD subdivision incentivizing drug rehabilitation for Prop. 47 offenders. “It’s very new, but the early indicators are that it’s on the right track,” said Feuer.

Before Prop. 47 reduced certain low-level property and drug-related felonies to misdemeanors, drug courts were a place where people charged with non-violent drug crimes could avoid a felony conviction and time behind bars if they completed a rehabilitation process.

But these drug courts, which were designed for those who committed felony drug offenses, have seen a huge drop in participation. Because the maximum sentence for a misdemeanor is one year, there is currently not as much incentive to apply for drug court, or to finish it out, once enrolled.

Feuer also said that his office is conducting a federally funded study to discover whether there are any links between Prop. 47 and crime rates. Critics claim the law was responsible for an uptick in property crimes. LAPD Chief Charlie Beck has pointed out that crime numbers fluctuate, and there are a number of factors likely contributing to increases in certain crime categories. (Property crimes have actually dropped 2% so far in 2016 over the same period in 2015.)

30 Comments

  • Apparently the Sheriff likes to repeat history. Our Custody Chiefs who have worked so hard trying to make Big Red happy, get slapped in the face by bringing in another from the outside. What does that tell the Execs. And now the stories are about weeding out those with dishonesty issues, hey I have no problem with that. lets start with the Tanaka people first, yea the ones that you still have not even tried to dump. Oh and don’t think we didn’t notice that your promoted yet another one. Great Job Jim, keep up the good work, I’m sure Paul is proud.

  • Having know Genao for a while I must say he is a good person. A great family man and will have your back. With that being said he was ROD for a long time and did his days off. Took his lumps as some would say. Did he screw up yes by all means. He made a mistake and he paid the consequences. He does not deserved to be fired. If the county doesn’t want him to be a Deputy any longer then retrain him for a trade that has equal pay. You don’t leave someone out to dry for a mistake that many members on this department are to scared to admit they to have done. Mistake or bad judgements happen all the time. I wish Danny the best and good luck.

  • “has made honesty among his 9,000 sworn deputies a centerpiece of his reform agenda”. Hopefully, the Sheriff is holding his Command Staff to the same standards……but I won’t hold my breath.

  • Bringing in another big wig from CDC? Great idea! The troops love that shit, not to mention the execs.. That’s great for morale. Maybe next McD can get the sheriff from Waxahatchie to come in and be the chief of some important division. Like say, Homeland Security. Yeah, that’s the ticket! You’re on the right track McD. Keep the train rolling Jim. Don’t let any naysayers tell you different.

  • What I love seeing is all the people retiring from 25-28 years on. Everyone has seen the writing on the wall and its time to get out of dodge before some inmate or civilian accuses you of some BS and your fired. Anyone hear any rumor about Parra trying to become the Police Chief of Beverly Hills. Whhhaaattt lololol.

  • There is at least one station captain on the Brady list. A deputy on the list is often banished to twirling paper clips, yet we have a convicted liar running a patrol station.

    Anyone who is on a Tanaka Donor list has demonstrated that they sell their soul for a promotion, and frankly should not be considered for any further advancement, yet they continue to be promoted. Nothing has changed.

    Line units are woefully understaffed as the Department creates new unfunded Bureaus, while deputies are getting drafted for overtime several times a month.

    Out of touch commanders are running around pushing the new class A shirt and brass snaps.

    This is just a sample.

    Sheriff, our Department is a mess. Do you really care about our Department, or is the Sheriff’s Department just a toy for you to play with while waiting for Beck to be termed out.

  • It is the right of every deputy to fight for their job back at Civil Service. How many people have been fired for cause. If they get their job back so be it. The Sheriff needs to look in his own backyard and find the hidden skeletons. Sheriff you may think you are doing the right thing but honestly you are way over your head. All you are is a political puppet. Most of your command staff is a joke. Buckle up everyone and get ready for a ride

  • Sheriff: When you took office and certainly during the time that followed you were told about current and past execs that lied and committed perjury. Ok, what did you do about it? Until you go after ALL the liars and perjurers you lack credibility! Someone once wrote on this blog that this is all about “low lying fruit” meaning line personnel and no others! I must agree! You don’t even have the courage to appoint your own person to Custody?

  • @ no. 5, Unfortunately for us, Beverly Hills has announced they are hiring Chief Sandra Spagnoli from San Leandro. I am sure they were looking for someone with sound character and a good set of morals.

  • Anybody that doesn’t realize that LASD policy and procedures only apply to sergeants and below is just plain naive. This is not just some malcontent rant from a 28 year veteran, it’s pure reality and has been proven time and time again.

  • #11 The 25 and done folks are the good guys and gals that got left standing at the curb as the PT Cruiser sped by, soaking them with filthy gutter water. With very few exceptions, only talentless, ass-kissers and vindictive cowards remain as Captain and above. McD continues to bring outsiders and retired idiots on to his management team instead of looking under his nose and promoting the few remaining accomplished and ethical supervisors. Survive 25 and get off the sinking ship as fast as you can. Fighting to save the dignity of the department is a hopeless, losing battle. It’s too far gone and you are dangerously outnumbered. If you still have 5+ to go, move on to something worthwhile that you can be proud of. Hanging on isn’t worth the heartache and grief. You only live once.

  • @10, Neal Tyler refused to add a line in the Sheriff’s new honesty policy to include supervisors to be held to the same standard as line staff. So much for ethical leadership.

  • McDonnell “has tightened the penalties for lying on the job, fired deputies who made false statements and is reviewing the assignments of those found to have lied in the past.”

    Does that mean that the captain that’s in command of one of the north county stations, won’t be promoted to Commander because he’s on the Brady list since he was a deputy? Let’s see the messaging the sheriff sends to his troops.

  • InterestedParty, is that the same captain who was too important to work line staff assignments as sergeant and lieutenant, and was fired as a deputy?

  • In case incumbent lieutenants, captains, commanders, and chiefs bother to ever wonder what their subordinates think of them, here’s some food for thought:

    1) If you don’t make your subordinates welfare one of your prime concerns, you have no business in a leadership position.

    2) If you think that continuing department practices of rewarding useless cronies and ignoring ethical, hard-working, and deserving employees is acceptable, you are an idiot, and probably were rewarded as a useless crony yourself.

    3) If you think it’s acceptable to use two separate employment rules, one for the chosen few, and the other for the rest, may you spend all of your retirement on the stand and in depositions, under oath, facing punitive damages.

    4) If you think somehow you will have the respect of the line staff by getting your ticket punched for the New York minute you spent at a “ghetto” station, the opposite is true. They laugh at you.

    5) If you thought it was OK to get the answers in advance for the sergeant or lieutenant test or oral interviews, or get your scores “tweaked” because you’re such a deserving dude, you’re a world class piece of shit.

    6) If, after cheating your way over a rank, you think that a subsequent promotion somehow “cleaned” your pathetic lack of integrity, refer to #5, only multiply it for every subsequent promotion.

    7) If you don’t think people know what you did to get to where you are, think again. There are very few who can hold their head high.

    8) If you are an assistant sheriff or higher, and were an executive during the Baca administration, you are not fooling anyone except Jim McDonnell.

    9) If you are near retirement age, retire now, quietly, no party, JDIC’s or flyers. You are an embarrassment to the LASD, and people are nice to you only because of the unlawful acts your kind has been doing to those who refuse to sing the company song.

    10) If and when you do grace the LASD by leaving, you will continue to be a parasite to the taxpayers of LA County, but at least you won’t be missed.

    Sincerely, the line staff.

  • What is the Sheriff’s Department’s policy re: the Brady list? Who administers it? Who is responsible for notifying the DA’s office of a Brady witness? How does a detective filing a case know if any of the deputies is on the list? Case law seems very clear about the obligation of the prosecution to notify the defense. There doesn’t seem to be any requirement for a subpoena for this information. Fail to disclose opens the door for some significant penalties.

  • @20 You must have retired a good while ago to ask your questions. The DA’s office administers the Brady Alert System. It is consulted every time a case is filed for law enforcement personnel who are listed.

    It’s unlikely an officer would be on the list without the agency knowing, as they are notified at the same time the officer is about possible inclusion. The officer has the right to a hearing with the DA to challenge the proposed decision.

    Even being on the list does not mean the officer can’t testify. That notion would preclude convicted felons from ever testifying, which of course happens every day. What it does, however, is hand the defense something to help convince the jury there is reasonable doubt because the officer has/had integrity issues. Their strategy, should a Brady officer be involved in a case, is to have other officers testify.

    I’m not sure what you meant about a subpoena being necessary for disclosure, but it is the DA (and law enforcement by extension) who is responsible to turn over exculpatory evidence to the defense per 1054.1(e) PC. I won’t get into what does and does not qualify an officer for the list – there’s a policy manual for guidelines that is pretty detailed.

  • @Statistically speaking: come on don’t leave us hanging. I could guess, but that wouldn’t be right, especially if I’m wrong. At least give us some initials. There are only two with the same initials and their reputations appear to be night and day.

  • EDITOR’S NOTE:

    Actually, no initials please. I would just have to delete. I completely understand the curiosity, but we can’t have that kind of specificity. “Statistically” is already skating a bit too close as it is.

    Thanks in advance for your cooperation.

    Happy Sunday.

    C.

  • In better times, not so long ago I would look at ALADS Dispatcher to read topics from the various directors. The newest elected directors are not coming through with anything. Gag order?

  • Well i have decided to become an investigator. Lets see whats under the Sheriffs rock…Since he wants to go back why don’t we. It doesn’t take much, just keep reading the papers. See what comes up. As far as your staff Which one is the one who shot his partner and then gets promoted. Crazy.

    See who is still around a year from now.

  • @ 25) C.T…….Nothing new there. Whoever is in charge is pretty much the Emperor. Anyone with a inkling of independence or any variation of opinion will silently sit on the sidelines. It could be worse if “Dot Five” Hayhurst was still around. Pay your dues and promote or retire.

  • @Changing Times: I heard Hernandez tried to submit an article criticizing the ALADS legal plan, but the Board stopped it from being printed.

  • I’m not surprised. 27. @ Fly on wall obviously hit target pretty close.
    Also not surprised by the alleged “Brady Lister” on the Board.

Leave a Comment