The Locke High School charter conversion petition was approved by the LAUSD board of education at around 2:30 on Tuesday afternoon. The vote will allow Steve Barr’s Green Dot charter group to take over the troubled and low-performing high school, and break it up into five or six smaller schools. It is the first time a non-district group will run an LAUSD school.
The contentious discussion leading up to the vote involved a lengthy public hearing that featured upwards of thirty speakers, including eccentric LA surfer pundit, Zuma Dogg, who said he had just come from speaking at both the LA City Council and (I think) the Board of Supervisors. “Speaking here gives me a perfect trifecta!” he tells me cheerily.
The anti-charter speakers are made up of a small cadre of angry Locke teachers plus a bunch of UTLA union officials including union president, A. J. Duffy who weres his very snazzy, trademark, two-tone shoes, and insists the Green Dot petition is breaking the law.
“I’m not backing off,” Duffy stage whispers to UTLA VP, Linda Guthrie, after he leaves the mic.
Guthrie herself makes an impassioned pitch against the conversion. “If you do this,” she says, “you’re going to send a message throughout this district, that the district is unable to heal itself.”
“Well isn’t that the point?” mutters one Green Dot supporter. In truth, Guthrie has inadvertently brought up the outcome that many Locke transformation advocates are hoping for. Based on personal conversations, I know that Santee teachers are watching the Locke process closely trying to decide if they want to go charter too— as are several schools in the valley.
“If we get Locke,” says Steve Barr a few minutes later, “I think we’ll eventually get Jefferson.” In some ways, Jefferson and Santee are more pressing cases that Locke. Certainly, Locke is a perennial low scorer in the district (of the 1318 ninth-graders that enrolled at Locke in the fall of 2001, only a terrifyingly low 332 managed to actually graduate in spring, 2005. And only 143 of those getting diplomas had the right credits to apply for admission to the University of California and/or California State University systems). Sadly, however, Santee and Jefferson’s scores—and graduation rates—are worse.
Green Dot, on the other hand, graduates on average of 80 percent of its 9th graders and nearly all have the necessary A-G credits to apply to a state-run college or university. Moreover, the Green Dot schools run on a comparative shoestring and, both Jefferson and Locke have been recipients of some of the district’s biggest influxes of money.
Interspersed with the union speakers, there is a string of students and teachers from Locke—plus a couple of local church pastors. Each come up to the microphone when their names are called from the board chairwoman’s list, and then plead for three minutes for the conversion, many of them citing versions of the above list of facts.
“It’s too late for me,” said a sixteen year old Locke senior named Alnesha Jones, “but I want my younger brothers and sisters to have a good school…a good education… like Green Dot is talking about.”
“They tell us we’re taking a big risk going with Green Dot,” says one of the pastors. “But as a Bishop I know used to say, ‘ You can’t fall down if you’re already lying on the ground.'”
As the speakers continue to cycle up to the microphone, Steve Barr leans against a side wall and, although he looks decidedly exhausted, he professes not to be worried. “We went out and got more signatures,” he says, “so today we have 38 permanent teachers who have signed the petition, out of 71 teachers at Locke. That’s more than half, so they have to give it to us,” he says. “I’m betting it’s going to be five to two in our favor.” [For the back-story on the signature battle click here.]
If the UTLA group is negative about the conversion, board member Julie Korenstein is withering. The new board members don’t know what they’re stepping into with this “experiment,” she says. “This is the most serious issue of my entire time on the board of education.” Korenstein also maintains that charters are really “vouchers in disguise.” She talks about the “criminal” amount of ADA [average daily attendance] money from the State that the Locke charter will take away from the district. (Yeah, and we’ll have the nerve to want to put that money toward kids,” whispers a Locke teacher.) “If you want to make money, you become a charter school operator,” Korenstein says with a wave of her highly manicured hands. “I’m appalled at this new board that’s willing to say, “Give the children away.’ I’m ashamed to be on this board!”
At these last two statements, new board member, Richard Vladovic grows visibly red in the face. “I take it personally when an individual says I don’t know what I’m doing,” he says. “This is history being made. It’s not about who owns these kids. It’s about who’s going to help these kids. LA Unified has been too focused on adult agendas. If my child was going to Locke,” he says. “ I’d take the experiment, not the failure.”
Clearly anxious to bolster their reformist reputations, all four of the new board members are very vocally in favor of a conversion, with Marlene Cantor squeezing quickly into their camp waving lots of newly-minted “I’ve always been a reformist” statements. In the abstract, one could be cynical and dismiss their collective enthusiasm as political posturing. But Vladovic seems too passionate for a facile dismissal. And, while board chairman, Monica Garcia, has a slicker delivery style than the rest, she lays out some stark truths that the board has failed to ever before acknowledge, and her righteous, preacher-like fury appears to be genuine.
“We at LAUSD spend $7.7 billion dollars every year,” Garcia says, “And yet we still have graduation rates that hover between 40 and 50 percent,” she says.
“I’m supporting this charter today because I’ve had enough of yesterday.”
UTLA VP, Linda Guthrie, who has spoken passionately—and arguably the most effectively—against the conversion, rolls her eyes at this last. “Okay, I admit that’s a great line,” Guthrie leans over to whisper. Then her voice softens. “Look, it isn’t just the district that’s at fault,” she says. “We—the union—have failed these teachers and these kids too.”
A few beats later, Guthrie confides that she’s planning to run for president of UTLA to replace Duffie.
The vote is finally taken just around 2:30 pm, and, as Barr had predicted it is 5 to 2 in favor of the conversion (the YEAs are provided by the four reformers plus former board prez, Marlene Canter), The two against, are courtesy of the still-fuming Korenstein and and an aggressively frowning, Marguerite LaMott, who earlier harrumphed something about Green Dot’s petition signatures possibly being fraudulent. “Look, we verified them all,” sighed one of the district’s attorneys.
As the last “YEA” vote is cast—I think it was by Richard Vladovic—wild cheering erupts immediately.
When the cheering subsides, Duffy and other union officials say that they’re going to sue to stop the conversion. “This isn’t over, not by a long shot,” yells UTLA regional coordinator, Mat Taylor, as he stalks out of the auditorium.
[NOTE: The LA Times has pretty much outlined the union’s contention about the legality—or lack thereof—of the petition. Rather than give you a version from my own notes, I’ll refer you to Joel Stein and Howard Bloom’s able reporting on the subject.]
Nevertheless, as the rest file out of the place, there is the strong feeling that something of moment has happened.
“This is historic,” says board member, Richard Vladovic.
Dr. Frank Wells, the Locke principal fired over the charter issue, echoes Vladovic’s sentiment. “You saw history made here today,” he says. “The whole world is watching us.” Wells admits that getting fired for trying to do what he believed was right for the school “felt a bit bizarre. But today makes it all worth it,” he says, “seeing this come to fruition. We don’t want to just reform this school. We want to make it a model, one of the best in the state. I think that’s Green Dot’s mission. And if you’re not in it with that kind of mission,” Wells says, “you shouldn’t be working in these schools at all.”
With that, he heads off down Beaudry Street to take about 30 Locke students to a victory lunch. Each of the kids is wearing a shamrock colored Green Dot t-shirt emblazoned with the message: GOT COLLEGE….IN WATTS?
“We will now,” says a tall, pretty 17-year-old named Kacey Andrus who says she just got offered a basketball scholarship to USC. “I think we’ve done something good today.”
Good reporting
Plus – Congratulations to the faculty, students and parents of Locke High School.
Well, damn! Good for the folks at Locke. Now. Let’s see what they can do with it. As you suggest, many eyes are watching.
Now, if California would just pay teachers what some get in Alabama.
Link: Nick Saban’s staff will make $2.245 million
TUSCALOOSA — The on-field coaching staff of University of Alabama head football coach Nick Saban will make a total of $2.245 million per year, according to figures obtained today by The Birmingham News. This apparently means the Crimson Tide staff is the highest-paid in the Southeastern Conference. LSU is reportedly second at $1.88 million, while Auburn’s staff is compensated at $1.87 million. In January, Saban became the nation’s highest-paid head coach with a salary that guaranteed him $32 million over eight years.”
Can the Locke High teachers also coach football?
After reading your update, I’m floored at what it takes to get people to do the jobs for which they are paid. But, you’re fighting one hard battle at a time. Decertify the union and the rest of the process will sail through.
What a ‘story board,’ Celeste. Blow-by-blow(s) plus pictures. Way cool. I love what you do with this medium.
I’m thrilled for Locke; the students, their parents, the teachers who are willing to risk, Steve Barr, and Frank Wells. It’s a real win for them and, hopefully, it’s the crest of a wave they can ride all the way to the beachhead of postsecondary dreams – whatever those might be. This had to happen. No argument. It’s the best outcome in the world for Locke. When you’ve been declared ‘dead’ you absolutely need resuscitation; code blue complete with crash cart. But, I also feel a bit of trepidation I assume/hope others must feel, too.
I’m less than willing to exclusively blame the union, or the district, for the total breakdown at Locke, although the behavior of their various representatives (and supporters on the board), as you describe here, leaves much to be desired. I’m more willing to center the blame at the mid-point between the district and the union; that place of overlap between LAUSD and UTLA. Relationships that are organized to be adversarial can have benefits; think mortgage lenders and mortgage underwriters and the sub prime meltdown – what happened when loan underwriters and loan originators stopped being adversarial. While it is possible that, in the case of Locke, LAUSD and UTLA entered into an ‘agreement’ to wrap Locke in a blanket of benign neglect, it is more likely that the union functions to keep the district from using Locke teachers as the sole source of ‘system slack.’
All systems need some slack. Stuff happens, the world turns, and suddenly you need resources that you didn’t need before. When the federal government comes down with some new set of unfunded/underfunded mandates, for which your general response is to appoint some VP-of-something-or-other to oversee it, where do you find the $$ to support that position? Quite often it comes from realignments in the teacher corps that results in larger classes, or loss of programs because the people who ran them are defunded. Districts by nature tend to run tight to the budget wire. Tax payers want maximum bang for their buck; optimums (as opposed to maximums) are a luxury. Every mechanism for district budget response is unwieldy and takes time. And, it seems the bigger the district, the more slowly it moves. The quick fix will always be at the level of the individual teacher.
Green Dot has a different management scheme. But that approach comes with a cost; “lifetime benefits” (although, I admit I have no idea what that means specifically). And, the question then, is to what extent does that attractive benefit provide stability and continuity of the teacher corps? And, is that stability and continuity valuable?
I think there is room for ‘competing systems’ or ‘competing approaches’ within LAUSD. God knows it’s big enough. But giving a product a new label slapped New and Improved is no guarantee that it’s better. Green Dot is really going to show its mettle here. I wish Barr all the best for the kids’ sake. And, I hope the district comes around to getting behind Green Dot in this effort. The time for cut-throat, head-to-head competition between these two approaches should be over with respect to Locke. What is needed now is a respectful relationship that brings about the best set of circumstances for Locke’s students.
Julie Korenstein ,ight have been referring to the indictments up north when another Charter School Operator (paying small wages with no bennnies to the teaching staff) is alleged by the State to be nothing but a scam to get money – remember those “Trade Schools” in the seventies that made out on Fed. Guaranteed loans and left their students high and dry? I’m not saying this is true of Green Dot but I recall Howard Blumes exposes in the WEEKLY back when.
And when you haven’t been paid because a computer system fouled up – as is the case in LAUSD – you might be dubious as UTLA is about “reforms.”
Just a thought. Now lets all hope this works.
(and lets also check back in a year or so and see if anything is improving)
Why on earth would you feature that zuma dogg or care what he thinks or where he shows up? Stopped reading after that. Is making a lot of noise to get attention enough to merit it?
I just hope Green-Dot has success at the new school, even if it means excluding the problem students, it is better to save many at the expense of a trouble-making few.
I didn’t need to read any “back-story” to know who voted against converting Locke to a Charter school. Marguerite LaMotte was supported by UTLA money in the last election and Julie Korenstein is from the old guard at LAUSD. You would expect the Mayor backed candidates to vote measures to reform the failing schools. I wonder what shame Korenstein will feel when Green-Dot is sucessful.
All of the quotes and on-liners reminds me of an expression
“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result”
…from former LAUSD board members
Celeste, what high-end graphics software are you using to create the fancy text on your pictures and are you also the photographer? You should also do a story on the Oscar DeLaHoya school, the students, staff and teachers deserve more attention.
maggie Says:
Why on earth would you feature that zuma dogg or care what he thinks or where he shows up?
*******************
Every circus needs a clown.
Nice reporting job, celeste!
L A: Not if you’re sitting there hearing the person waste five minutes a day at a council meeting while you’re sitting and waiting your turn behind lots of people with legitimate business, anxious to address the Council or Supes, but can’t until all “public comment cards” are exhausted. We pay our reps to waste their time this way. Democracy requires self- restraint, so those who really need the time can come forward. When the King used to have a Court Jester, it’s because he wanted one, and anyone else who spoke their mind had their head cut off or ended up in the dungeon.
listener on the sidelines says that Green Dot’s “approach comes with a cost; ‘lifetime benefits’ (although, I admit I have no idea what that means specifically).”
One of the things it means is that teachers who retire after working enough years continue to have medical insurance for the rest of their lives, with LAUSD paying the premiums (the same as they got while they were working). That is a serious, significant benefit, particularly for older teachers who have been working for a lot a years. My wife, a 57-year-old LAUSD high-school teacher, loves her job (and is very, very good at it), but detests the way her school — and LAUSE in general — is run. Would she vote to go charter if the question were presented, and if she were to lose that future benefit? I’m guessing the answer is no, and I understand completely.
Thanks, Bob. I thought maybe … but couldn’t recall well enough to speculate on the extent of the incentive. You’re right, it’s significant. Having a revolving door for faculty at the school house gate carries a cost. Attrition is real, you expect it, and plan for it. But you also hope that it’s not overwhelming – for a whole array of reasons. And, yet with health care premiums increasing at a rate greater than inflation, I have to believe that employer provided health insurance will become a thing of the past for current employees, to say nothing of those who have retired. I can certainly understand why teachers nearing retirement wouldn’t want to touch Green Dot with a ten foot pole. In periods of economic uncertainty, when you’re looking at the reality of a fixed income, having a significant cost stapled to the floor for you is profoundly important.
Amazing when left, right and those in between are ALL pulling for the students at one school, and essentially against an entrenched union. Here’s hopin it works.
Bob, thanks for talking about the Lifetime benefits issue. It is why some of the older teachers—particularly those with medical conditions—feel trapped between the devil and the deep blue sea on the Green Dot charter issue. What Barr has always hoped to do, and what I think everyone is moving toward, albeit, very slowly, is some kind of waiver agreement with UTLA that will take such issues into consideration and still allow Green Dot to operate within its budget, particularly in the start up phase.
RLC, certainly there have been some lousy charter schools, but Green Dot has a solid track record with few discernible glitches. They’re not perfect, of course. With Locke, Barr is going to be put into the position of the dog that has been chasing cars and has, long last, caught one. NOW what to do? But he’s one of the smartest people I know, and fearless.
I’m going to be tracking the process closely because I think it’s a great story. Plus I’m curious as to how he’s going to deal with some of the problems that his previous Green Dot schools that, while they cater to lower-income kids in rough neighborhoods, are essentially boutique schools that parents with enough on the ball self-select their kids into. Whereas with Locke, they’re going to have to take everybody from a notoriously bad-ass neighborhood—which will be quite a challenge.
Maggie, I put Zuma Dogg in because in the midst of all the high drama and flying accusations (the majority of which I didn’t have the room to detail), a little comedy didn’t seem out of place. And you really should have seen the consternation among the union folks, many of whom I happened to be sitting with for much of the time. “Zuma DOGG???” they kept saying. “What’s a Zuma DOGG?” Plus, by that time I’d been in the &^%$#* auditorium for four over-heated hours with nothing to eat all day, so my inner adolescent though photographing him and putting him up was a dandy idea.
Thanks, Listener, it took forever, but it was fun putting up faces to match the unfolding drama.
LA Res, I use the paint function of Adobe Photoshop, which is a little like using a Ferrari to drive up and down your drive way. I also have a small, cheap Wacom drawing tablet, which means that I don’t have to use a mouse for the scribbling, but rather have a stylus and a plastic surface on which the stylus draws. And, yes, I think Animo Oscar de la Joya is a great story. I know kids who go there, for which it was life-changing. I think most likely, however, I’ll end up doing a more extended story on Animo Film and Theater Academy,which has a lot of dramatic back story, as it was a Jefferson before it was at Green Dot, and the district tried to kill it. I also intend to chronicle much of the Locke transformation. We’re talking about it at the Weekly.
Here’s a link: http://www.wacom.com/index2.cfm
Celeste notes, “What Barr has always hoped to do, and what I think everyone is moving toward, albeit, very slowly, is some kind of waiver agreement with UTLA that will take such issues [e.g., lifetime medical insurance] into consideration and still allow Green Dot to operate within its budget.”
Celeste, do you really think there’s a reasonable chance that UTLA is going to give up that kind of club over its members’ heads when an intractable asshole like Mr. Duffy is in its driver’s seat?
hooray!
steve barr is a good guy and the work green dot has done in schools that need it is really great. if the UTLA and the board don’t like it, well then why don’t they do something to fix their schools?
Green Dot does what they SHOULD be doing, and empowers people at the same time. When you see parents teachers and the community come together like this, shouldn’t it be encouraged, over the needs of a few union bosses?
This observation of Celeste’s is well worth emphasizing:
Before we have the ticker tape parade, let’s check back over the course of the year and see how it goes.
Celeste, this is slightly off-topic but you might want to look into this.
The new UC Irvine Law School offered the position of Founding Dean to Erwin Chemerinsky of Duke (and formerly USC). I understand he was a finalist to head Duke’s Law School.
Shortly before he accepted he wrote an op ed piece in the LAT decrying the feature in the PATRIOT act Reauthorization that gives the AG – then Alberto Gonzales – a lot of say over death penalty cases.
Well at least one leader of a pro-death penalty violently objected and then word came that two – unnamed – members of the Borard of Regents were against the appointment. The Regents get final say on all admin spots. Well this week the Chancellor at UCI rescinded the appointment saying that Chemerinsky was too “Controversial”. Two Conservative legal scholars – John Eastman, Dean of Chapman Law School, and Doug Kmiec of Pepperdine – were contacted by the TIMES and said they were “Apalled” at the action. Another Law Prof, from Stanford, said that Chemerinsky’s appointment gave the new school “instant Credibility” and that his “firing” gave it “an instant Black eye.”
There will be more but I think the Faculty there should howl over this. I mean the Med School’s not enough of a joke?
Richard, thanks for the suggestion. I’ve been thinking about this all day, but have not had time to make calls. Nevertheless I may very well blog on it tonight.
Thanks!
rlc, I made the call to UC-Irvine and asked them if they wanted law students coming out like you.
[…] The Los Angeles Unified board voted 5-2 to accept a petition by a majority of teachers who want try something new, reports Celeste Fremon of WitnessLA. “If you do this,†(United Teachers of Los Angeles […]
Celeste
Do you have any info about a gang fight at Locke?
According to the Times article, the screwy payroll system has OVERPAID the teachers $45 million on balance, although there are enough angry ones underpaid that “for now,” the Board decided not to demand the overpayments back. Will they ever?
Another story in Daily News yesterday clarified that the new ten million consulting fee to fix the Deloitte system is going to the EPI-USE system, by a company in Atlanta — which fixed a similar disaster the Deloitte system caused the community college system. So all SAP systems are definitely not the same — Deloitte’s was never even beta tested at a school, before being put into the whole system.
Who was responsible for choosing this untested system, when another(s) was/were available?
Korenstein’s fear that charters are “vouchers in disguise” is pathetic. I wish vouchers weren’t illegal in California.
She, LaMotte and Duffy all just are concerned about maintaining their own, and the teachers’, power, not what’s good for this kids. When 1/4 of the kids who entered as freshmen graduated last year at Locke, and only 10% of the entering class qualifies for Cal State Admission, what are they trying to preserve, exactly?
Fact that many teachers are opposed apparently has more to do with fear or losing their accrued benefits — thanks to the posters here for pointing that out. Wish the Times article did, instead of making it sound like a philosophical difference.
However, I didn’t know that Green Dot usually demands $9,000 per student to do its job, as well as smaller numbers. That does give them an advantage.
This Locke experiment will see if it can be done by keeping all kids in the school, not just those who sign willingness to work. Or will that be implemented at Locke?
Maggie ……….
This Locke experiment will see if it can be done by keeping all kids in the school, not just those who sign willingness to work. Or will that be implemented at Locke?
*********************
I personally would not be crying if Green-Dot expels (10%-??%) of the gangsters and problem kids from their schools.
It is far better to provide a good education to 90% of the students at the expense of 10% of the knuckle-heads who ruin the class-room and school for everybody else.
I have seen too many students lives/education ruined at Belmont High school because of cholos in and around the school.
It’s ironic, that last night I met a software engineer who manages software projects using SAP and he has a very good opinion of Deloitte. He mentioned many successful large SAP integration projects he worked on with people from Deloitte. I asked about the LAUSD project and he just gave a big sigh and mentioned the large number of changes that LAUSD has been asking for during this project. I wanted to ask for many more details but he was quickly becoming agitated, I felt like Mike Wallace oops Celeste Fremon.
LA Res, last night I dropped by the Green Dot/Locke celebration (Let’s just say, among those celebrating, men and women both, there were a lot of cigars and tequila shooters in evidence.) Anyway, the subject of the recent riot came up. It’s my understanding that it was a gang issue, and that around 70 or so people were involved. (I wasn’t taking notes so I’m relying on my memory.)
The issue came up in the context of some of the teachers illustrating how things were in far better control when Dr. Wells was the principal as he was far, far better at handling those things. Whereas, if my memory serves me correctly, the present principal was away at a meeting, and declined to return to campus although his school was having a crisis.
To Maggie and some others,
It’s true that we’ll have our work cut out for us at Locke, having to deal with all of the children and not merely the self-selected, but this time we’ll have 2 major advantages over previous Green Dot schools: we’ll have a school campus and not some warehouse to convert, and we’ll save all the money which would normally go into rent. In addition, we’re determined to get FULL FUNDING from the state, not the crumbs left over after the bureaucracy has taken their cut. Monica Garcia, in her brilliant closing speech, pointed out that the district has a $7.7 billion budget, and it serves around 700,000 students. That works out to $11,000 per student. We’re going to fight to get all of the money due our kids, and I won’t be satisfied with less that $10,000 per student. These will give us considerable advantages over previous Green Dot schools.
L.A. Resident,
The whole point is not to kick the kids out onto the streets. That’s exactly what we’re trying to get away from. The New York Times has an interesting story today on changing philosophies around the nation regarding gang intervention, something I think Celeste has some expertise in (and we hope we can get you to share it with us). Simply locking the kids up doesn’t work, and kicking them out is not a proper goal for an educator. Instead, we expect to use the money to get smaller class sizes and more personal intervention with our students, hopefully through an advisory system. This is about really leaving no children behind, in practice, not just in rhetoric.
Bruce Smith Says:
The whole point is not to kick the kids out onto the streets. That’s exactly what we’re trying to get away from.
*********************
While I can admire the desire and nobleness of a school teacher trying to save every single kid, including every gang member, I just feel that is asking way too much for a teacher to teach and also be a gang intervention worker. I am well aware that you can not arrest your way our of the gang problem. I have read many professional opinions including law enforcement and I can see what has happened in California which has too many people in prison and only getting worse. (Maybe we need to legalize some drugs, marijuana?). Also some people feel legalizing drugs would remove the drug money motive and revenue from gangs.
I hope Green-Dot can accomplish the goal of keeping every single student in school, but I see the gang problems as more than just the problem of school educators and Green-Dot charter schools. I would consider it a MAJOR victory if the Green-Dot can keep 85% of the current students in school and expels 15% of the most problematic students to a reform school.
Retaining 85% would be a big improvement–and we aim to do better.
Meanwhile, back on the moons of Jupiter, Janice Hahn is busy trying to stick her hands deeper into your pocket. She’s trying to hit every LA homeowner with an additional $40 per year parcel tax to fund intervention programs.
So let’s see, with no definition in hand of what a gang intervention program should be, and Laura Chick sorting through the paperwork to figure out why the millions they’re spending aren’t doing any good and Connie Rice putting her head in her hands muttering “You’ve wasted every nickel of it so far,” Ms. Hahn is merrily putting the cart before the horse. Memo to Janice. Wise stewardship of other people’s money behooves you to intelligently use the money you already have before you ask for more. This is like telling your boss, “I know I’m never on time and I’m always screwing up and you’re losing business on account of me. But if you give me a raise, I’ll do better. This time I mean it.” Nobody ever achieved success by rewarding failure.
posted by Wally | 1:20 AM | 0 comments
Friday, October 26, 2007
TVR GANGSTER CONVICTED.
Timothy McGhee was convicted of homicide yesterday after years of sitting in County waiting for his trial. Variously know as “Huero” or “Eskimo,” McGhee, a former Criminal Justice student at Cal Poly Pomona, was decribed as being something less than a traditional gangster and more of a spree or thrill killer. Unlike his former associate, the King of Drew Street who was all about business, McGhee’s assaults and homicides often had nothing at all to do with business. A lot of his capering didn’t make him, TVR or the Meros a nickle.
posted by Wally | 8:28 AM | 17 comments
Thursday, October 25, 2007
THEY’RE COMING THICK AND FAST.
Last week, the US Attorney indicted a whole bunch of F13 operators. Today, a couple dozen CLCs got rolled up in another Federal beef.
We haven’t seen this level of local and Federal LE activity since the mid to late 1990s when three giant RICO cases blew through town like a freight train and rolled up dozens of Emeros, Associates, shot-callers, key holders, tax collectors and soldiers. You can bet there may be one or more investigations hanging fire somewhere in SoCal.
I don’t generally dispense advice but this is a golden opportunity for gang intervention activists to mobilize and start hitting those streets most impacted by these cases. With the leadership and mid-level managers taken out of circulation, now’s the time to do some serious gang diversion and intervention. If Jeff Carr, LA’s invisible gang czar would maybe hit those streets with a big chart showing who got arrested, why and what kind of time they’re facing, there may be an opportunity to turn the young guns around. A “This Could Be You In Five Years” presentation might reach a few hearts and minds and get these kids on the right track. LA has somewhere between $82 and $100 million to dispense on programs. Once the Scrooge message of the Ghost of Christmas future sinks in, use some of that money to get the at-risk kids into programs.
posted by Wally | 10:22 AM | 14 comments
Friday, September 21, 2007
BACK FROM THE ROAD.
Just to dispel some rumors, I haven’t gone into PC, gotten whacked or retired to a Malibu mansion. I have, however, spent a lot of time doing radio, TV and print promotion for the book, most of it out of town. Believe it or not, this is my first full week back in the Fortress of Solitude since July 25 when the book hit the streets. Not that I’m complaining, but there’s a monumental shift in your life when you go from being a hermit scribe to a creature of promotion.
One of the big changes is that I haven’t been able to stay up to date on what’s happening on the street. Once you start talking way too much about what you’re doing, you actually stop doing it and you’re just talking about it. That make sense?
I’ve got a three-foot stack of stories and documents that need reading and about fifty phone calls to return. Once I whittle through the stack and get on the phone, I’ll be back in the loop and get some fresh information on the site.
Stay tuned for more.
posted by Wally | 8:34 AM | 128 comments
Thursday, July 26, 2007
RADIO ALERT.
For those interested, Armstrong and Getty will have me on the air in about 15 minutes. Sorry for the late notice but that’s life in the big city. I’ve been told they podcast so you can catch it online.
At 12:40 Pacific time, WCCO in Minneapolis on The Jack Rice Show. I think they live stream and podcast as well.
More to come.
posted by Wally | 8:03 AM | 54 comments
Tuesday, July 24, 2007
LONG TIME NO POST.
As you can imagine, getting a book off the launch pad isn’t something you can do on a part time basis. I’ve been going flat out for the three weeks and haven’t had a minute to post.
The book is hitting the stores as we speak while reviewers and media people have gotten early copies. For the most part, the response has been positive. More on that later on. The take from Publisher’s Weekly, however, was generally negative and they took one quote the wrong way. I quoted DA Manzella saying, “We know exactly the kind of families that produce criminals. I’d like to go in there and take them out. But we can’t do that.” What the DA meant was TAKE THEM OUT OF THOSE FAMILIES. Not “take them out” as in terminate them. The intent was clear to everybody that read and edited the manuscript but apparently, you have to spell things out to some people. The point the DA was making was that public policy will not allow kids to be yanked out of environments that we know will produce unhealthy attitudes or destructive behaviors. It was very clear from the context of that entire paragraph exactly what the DA meant. The sentence prior to that stated, “the ultimate road block to a gang is a stable family.” Some people read into things that which they choose to read.
On another topic, be on the lookout for radio appearances. I just got a schedule of potential interviews and I’m waiting for confirmation. If there’s any interest in posting up a schedule of interviews, let’s hear about it.
posted by Wally | 1:08 PM | 31 comments
Friday, June 22, 2007
HE’S FINALLY HERE.
After decades of talking about it, the city finally has a gang — what? Boss? Emperor? Overlord? Call him anything but Czar. According to Rev. Jeff Carr, a Czar is a guy who is forcibly retired in front of a firing squad. Can’t fault him for the analogy.
It’ll be interesting to see how much horsepower he’ll be given and what precisely will he do. At this point, nobody seems to know. The old dictum is that he who holds the purse strings wields the power. But it’s not clear if he’ll have control of doling out funds to intervention programs or pulling the plug on them if they crash and burn like No Guns.
From everything we’ve heard so far, his position is that of advisor to the Mayor. Which doesn’t sound like an executive position. He’s the go-to guy when the Mayor needs to decide on gang issues. This is probably not the way the office should have been organized but the rumor is that Carr was picked more for his ability to solicit grants from public and private sector sources than any actual gang intervention capabilities. We’ll see.
posted by Wally | 8:47 AM | 249 comments
[…] best LA-based education drama of this past year has been the proposed—and now LAUSD school board approved— charter conversion of Locke High School by Steve Barr and Green Dot. A big part of the drama […]
[…] editorial board about his proudest moments since he arrived Brewer, in all seriousness, pointed to the Locke/Green Dot charter conversion victory as one of his main achievements. Earth to the Admiral: Dude! It happened in spite of the district […]