Education LAPD LASD

Filling the News Gap: USC and Crenshaw H.S. Report South LA

crenshaw-high-school

As newspapers continue to ax more reporters, producing
ever larger gaps in local news coverage, various groups are attempting to move into the breech.

The latest such venture launches tonight.
It is a joint endeavor called Intersections: the South LA Reporting Project,” in which a bunch of USC graduate students in journalism are working with a bunch of Crenshaw High School students in order to produce news stories about the South LA community.

The first round of results is online in the form of audio slideshows, radio commentaries and blogs on such topics as how teachers are impacted by a tough economy, how Crenshaw honor roll students managed their achievements, and how and why various LA immigrants made the choice to come to the U.S.

Admittedly, Intersections* is still in its beginning stages, but it just received a vote of confidence in the form of a $25,000 grant from Knight Foundation to help with it’s next phase.

Emily Henry is one of the talented grad students who has been involved with the project since its inception in August 2008. Here’s what she said about the goals she and faculty directors, Bill Celis and Willa Seidenberg, originally had in mind:

“It would be a community forum and a hyper-local news website, focused on the areas of Los Angeles that usually fall short of media attention, unless the stories involve a body count: From Inglewood to Watts, Compton to the Crenshaw District, Intersections would serve the zipcodes that form the new incarnation of the old “South Central.” Residents, community leaders and high school students would become a solid base for citizen reporting, while USC’s own journalism students would be broaching their comfort zones and pounding the pavements, learning ethnically and culturally diverse reporting.”

It sounded great on paper, but when Emily and her grad school colleagues actually got to the high school, although the Crenshaw kids were eager and willing, the USC group found themselves faced with a series of vexing obstacles. For instance, many of the school’s available computers had missing keys, the students were hampered in their classwork by text books that were woefully out of date (and some didn’t have their own text books), one of the project’s extremely devoted teachers was likely one of those who would soon be laid off by LAUSD, and several of the students had problematic lives outside school that stood in the way of their achievement.

With these and other issues in mind, I asked Emily to write about her experiences at Crenshaw High School, what those experiences told her about the state of LA’s public education, and how the Crenshaw students managed to transcend the difficulties that blocked their journalistic progress.

on-wall-cu

Her first chapter is below: (And another related essay by Emily is here.)

*****************************************************************************************************************

*(It should be noted that Intersections/South LA Project has the same name as Daniel Herandez’s longtime and wonderful blog Intersections.)

*****************************************************************************************************************

Intersections: Chapter One

By Emily Henry

Surrounded by a chain-link fence with heavy duty locks on its gates, a group of five teenagers leaned against a car in the parking lot of Crenshaw High School. It was almost 10am on a humid Monday morning. A cloud of smoke was rising above their heads, a hidden joint fanning a smell like skunk road kill out into the clear blue day. When the bell rang, the teenagers grabbed their backpacks and trudged around the corner, through the line of cars, past the vacant cop car on the other side of the metal perimeter, and into the side door of the building.

I followed close behind, stopping to sign in at the portable desk and to slap a “visitor” badge on my shirt for the first time, while more students trickled through the door. A tapestry of signs, hand-written in black permanent marker, was pasted above their heads: “No hoodies,” “No electronic devices,” “Tardy fines start at $250.”

I was here working for “Intersections: The South Los Angeles Reporting Project,” to begin the task of building a journalism mentoring program for the third period, senior seminar class. I was one of a group of USC journalism graduate students teaming up with the Social Justice and Law Academy to teach 35 pupils how to report on their community.

From the outside, Crenshaw High School seemed ominous. Segregated from the busy streets of the Crenshaw District by a quiet residential area, the building was partially obscured shuttered by an 8-foot high chain-link fence. At least one LAPD patrol car sat outside at all times during school hours. Usually, by 3pm, there were two or three. The school’s reputation was also unpromising. I knew Crenshaw had a 50 percent drop-out rate — the fourth highest in the LAUSD — and a reputedly troubling level of student disengagement. Coupled with the police presence and the rumors of on-going racial tension between the 70-30 Black-Hispanic student body, there seemed cause to feel nervous. I imagined metal detectors and security searches, guns in lockers and kids throwing gang signs at one another. But I left those stereotypes at the door that day, as soon as I stepped through and felt the vibrant atmosphere inside.

The hallways were full with voices and echoes, the sound of rubber soles on squeaky linoleum, laughter and chatter, as students slowly filed from one side of campus to the other for third period classes. I walked with a group of two girls and three guys who said they were heading to the same classroom as me. Every few steps we seemed to pass notes of inspiration painted on the walls: “Do what’s in your heart” read large, blue letters at one end of the hallway. At the other, a more discreet manta was on display: “Our greatest glory is not in never failing, but in rising up every time we fail.” A security guard in a black vest greeted the passing teenagers with a friendly smile. “How you doing today?” he said, extending his arm to touch fists with one of the taller boys. “Good,” the boy replied, and bowed his head as he drifted through the open door to room 102.

As I made my way inside the classroom, three other USC journalism mentors were already standing against the whiteboard. The room was a wall of noise. A third of the kids had earphones in their ears, listening to an invisible beat while leaning lazily across their individual desks. The others were passing papers, laughing and taunting one another in clusters, or composing text messages on cell phones in their laps. On each wall was a poster with a question written in colored marker at the top: “Who leads the country?” The students had penned-in various answers below, from “the President” to “the people.” Frederick Douglass surveyed the room from the front wall, and on the lockers at the back, a sign showing a sad child leaning on his arms read “Stop the budget cuts.”

Alex Caputo-Pearl, aka “Mr. C.P.,” the goateed classroom teacher, called for silence by raising a clenched fist in the air. “Solidarity, everyone” he said. “Solidarity.” The noise sank to a low murmur. “What is the definition of ‘social justice’?” he asked. A voice burst from the back of the room, “human rights!” Another said “freedom!,” and a third called out “civic responsibility!” A girl in the second row put her hand up and said softly, “it means being able to be who you want to be.”

“That’s right,” said Mr.C.P. “And a big part of being who you want to be, of being free and exercising your rights as an individual, is having a voice.”

The plan for this session, he explained after introducing the USC guests, was to brainstorm with the class about potential topics for their first assignment as reporters. Eventually, the 35 students, ages 17 and 18, would be split into groups of four to produce multimedia stories on topics that they felt mattered most to their community. Within half an hour, I was walking between desks explaining what would happen over the next few months. They would be researching, conducting interviews, taking pictures and shooting video. They would be taught how to edit audio, compose a photograph and use slideshow software. Most importantly, their work would not stay in the classroom. It would not be pinned to the walls or showcased only to parents and teachers. It would be posted online for anyone to see. “So,” I said. “What are the most important stories to cover?”

Soon, we were discussing immigration,
teenage pregnancy, education spending, racial profiling and drop-out rates. I walked from group to group, asking the class what questions they wanted to find answers to.

“Why aren’t there any parks around here?” asked a girl with a lip piercing. “Where are kids supposed to play?”

“Why do people drop out of school?”
discussed inquired the louder girls in the corner.

“What effect is Obama’s presidency going to have on the relationship between Blacks and Hispanics?” asked a group of three Hispanic boys and an African-American girl.

“Why doesn’t Arnold spend more money on education and less on prisons?” said a boy still wearing earphones.

When the bell rang for the end of third period and the students waved goodbye, I realized, for the first time and definitely not the last, that in a city where everyone is so afraid of each other, these kids were fearless. They knew what was wrong with their world and weren’t afraid to talk about it. Convincing them, however, that their words had weight beyond the school’s sunshine-filled hallways was going to be the hardest task. “People see Crenshaw as being the lowest of the lowest because of reputation, because of what they think students are here” one of the seniors, Nataly, would later explain. “They don’t see more than the way we dress, the way we talk, where we come from. Maybe we haven’t been raised the best way ever, but I think that’s why they put us down.”

(photos by Emily Henry)

15 Comments

  • I applaud this project, but find it strange that they would use the same blog name as that of the blog written by LA/Mexico City journalist Daniel Hernandez, a blog that’s been around since 2006.

  • Oh, man, Gustavo, you are so right. I’m a fan of Daniel’s blog, and have linked to him in the past, but to be honest, I completely failed to make the connection. Duh!

    (I have no idea if the Annenberg folks were aware of the name duplication or not.)

    I just now put a link and a note into the post.

    For those who don’t know, Daniel Hernandez, who used to be a star at the LA Weekly, is now reporting from Mexico City and has been doing some great stuff of late on the Swine Flu, among other topics.

    Check it out.

    http://danielhernandez.typepad.com/

  • We, too, didn’t make the connection. The name “Intersections” came up in a brain-storming session one day, and was the result of a series of events that had happened to our student reporters at various intersections (to use my own example, for instance, one of the most significent moments in my South LA reportage happened at Florence/Normandie when I interviewed Henry “Kiki” Watson at a chili dog stand. But that’s a whole other story.)

  • Thank you Celeste, Gustavo. Good luck with this project, Emily. It is a little strange, re the name. Weeks ago I alerted my contacts at USC Annenberg about the duplication but I never heard a response.

    Admittedly, I don’t own the rights to the word “Intersections” but I have been blogging under the name since December 2006. Prior to that, I thoroughly searched the Web to make sure that the name was not taken by another blog, but last I checked, it appears that since then at least one another blog (A Christian-themed one) has adopted the name and re-published its archives.

    It’s a good name for a blog. And I admire the work at Crenshaw. I guess I just assumed bloggers and journalists at any level would practice creative decorum and also strive for originality.

    Thank you again, Celeste. Love your work, as always.

  • This is off topic, but on Feb 26th Celeste brought to our attention an upcoming supreme court case weighing the validity of using ID theft laws as an enhancement against illegal immigrants. Those of us who thought this seemed like a misapplication of law were called “left-wing loons.” Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of Flores Figueroa, the defendant. Yes, I am gloating a little.

  • Having said that, (one more thing here), maybe know that we share a name we can share our stories and approaches to journalism next time I’m in Los Angeles.

    Best,
    D.

  • Drat, Daniel, wish you were in town as their opening is tonight.

    But although I have exactly zero influence on such things (as this is not my project), it sounds like a great idea to me.

  • PS: Thanks for the heads up on the ruling, Mavis. I didn’t notice last night. The ruling itself is fun to read. Nearly everyone had to put in their two cents.

    I’ll put up a link to it later.

  • To be fair, while the word “intersections” might not be common for newsy blogs, it’s all over the place in academia, especially in a monstrous form “intersectionality.” anyone studying race, gender or class tends to drop some version of it often.

    you should be golden. good work, guys and good luck. here’s to hoping you carry this work on past your academic career — and that there will be a place to do it!

  • When you read this you’d think there were no bloggers covering South LA at all. I guess bloggers who blog on that section of the city only count if people who are friends with the old school of journalism (mainly middle aged white guys) say they count and are under 17 years old, so everyone can feel good about themselves.

    Not saying that this isn’t nice, but you know the lack of acknowledgement of the people of color who do write on this topic by more mainstream blogs is appalling.

    Browne

  • I’m disappointed that commentary here has been reduced to a conversation about the name of the project. It seems wasteful, accusatory, and beyond the point… the two entities are completely different from one another. I also think it unnecessary, Celeste, to include a “note” in the body of the post that addresses the similar naming. Can we concentrate on the point at hand here and be supportive and/or critical of the content?

    Thank you, Browne, for your comment. Unfortunately, it has been the case that many worthy blogs in the South L.A. area do not get the recognition they deserve, despite being essential resources to the community. I am particularly grateful to Lynwood Watch (which recently moved to http://lynwoodwatch.blogspot.com/) for providing an one-stop place for information covering the city of Lynwood and fostering conversation among the community. This is a great example of grass-roots media.

  • Emily, in truth, had I noticed it earlier, I would have acknowledged the similarity in names, as both sites are LA based (at least Daniel’s was originally) and so a nod would have seemed appropriate. Had I done so, I suspect that would have been the end of the discussion.

    But indeed it would be nice to have more commentary on the terrific content of Intersections, which is, after all, the point.

    Browne, as Emily said, certainly bloggers like you and others are the people who have done so much already to move into the space left by the paucity of coverage by the so-called mainstream media.

    And there are publications like The Wave, that have been doing great work for years, and have now become strong online presences.

    But I think there’s still a lot of room for more. As you’ve often pointed out, there are a whole lot of stories that are missed, or the angle on them seems skewed. So, I salute Intersections for stepping up in the way that they have, particularly in mentoring high school kids so that the next generation can begin to own and tell the stories of their communities as they see and experience them. I don’t think we can possibly do that too often.

    Plus, I think cooperative ventures and partnerships will be increasingly important as all of us grapple for new models.

  • This is excellent work Emily. Excellent story telling and lots of hard work. I too am rather put off by these comments. Instead of recognizing the hard work put in by students like you, for no pay and no glory, you are nitpicked about the name of a project that (while it does overlap Mr.Hernandez’ blog) is hardly a copyrighted name or concept. Anyone with an IQ above room temp can deduce the name was chosen innocently and with no awareness that someone else had also chosen, excuse the pun, such a pedestrian project name. Nor is it your fault that local-based blogs don’t get their due. The world is full of unfairness. People like you help correct those wrongs, not aggravate them.

    The important thing is the work that has been accomplished. And again, you are to be applauded for your fine work with the students of Crenshaw. That’s what counts. Not sideline moaning.

    Memo to Gustavo Arellano: consider spending your time doing what you do best — publicly apologizing for the Village Voice Media pirates that have slashed much of SoCal journalism. That you (so far) survived their blade is only a matter of serendipity. The article that your company brothers published last week in L.A. Weekly on LAPD Chief Bratton was one of the worst pieces of trash in recent history. It should be widely circulated as an example of how NOT to do journalism. If the Weekly or the OC Weekly had one regular writer with the talent and tenacity of a Ms. Henry, we would all be better off.

  • I’m fine with partnerships. I’m not fine with the fact that race, class, and South LA can only be discussed in the blogosophere on the terms that the mainstream media dictates.

    The blogosphere is just as racist and sexist as the mainstream media that I didn’t particular care for. I am glad the LA Times is going away, but oddly the electronic beast seems to be having the exact same problems and they seem quite proud to do nothing about it. It’s not like linking people cost money, but it’s not about money it’s about power and control of information.

    And this isn’t about me. This is about my respect for the craft of journalism. This kind of mother theresa journalism that doesn’t want to step on anyone’s toes especially the people with the real power and wants to be a source of change by working with evil a little bit is a dangerous trend.

    To me journalism, advocacy, and politics should be all in different camps, because you can’t tell the truth if you’re trying to be someone’s friend.

    You can’t tell the truth if at some point you want to get a job at an organization that is holding the purse strings.

    I think these partnerships with private schools and various funding agencies with particular political slants is a dangerous thing for the truth.

    Can you really write a biting piece on the racism of a bank that just gave a food bank in the neighborhood 50,000 dollars, I mean you can you? Can you write a biting piece on the inequities of the reaction of a USC grad getting killed by a hit and run and a regular guy in South LA being killed by a hit and run when the people from USC are giving you money.

    I mean come on how objective is this site going to be when there is a whole group of very powerful people with money who keep this program alive that you can’t even talk about.

    The reason South LA is in the state that it is in probably is very connected with the very people who have been in LA for years and are probably USC alum or at least married to them.

    USC is an interesting place it has enough money to make sure the people in the community don’t ever complain too loudly on all of the little extras they get in comparison to the community as a whole.

    Browne

Leave a Comment