(Sigh.) Just read it. I have little to add except a prolonged grinding of teeth.
(For those coming to this issue for the first time, the back story can be found HERE.)
LA Times Editorial
JUST WHEN IT LOOKED like the rebel forces at Locke High School were going to wrest their school from the inept clutches of the Los Angeles Unified School District and convert it to a Green Dot charter, the empire struck back. The district invalidated the charter application last week, saying the petition no longer had the requisite majority of teachers on board. Seventeen teachers, the district says, want to rescind their signatures because they misunderstood what they were signing.Can’t they read? Didn’t they do their homework and speak to colleagues at other Green Dot schools? At this point, the school board should step in and rap its administrators on the knuckles — because only it has the authority to reject a petition for lack of signatures. And if it doesn’t do so, we hope that this will be the first order of business for the new school board, which takes over next month. Voters want charters, and they want the school district to clear the way for them to happen.
District officials are adamant that they did not pressure teachers at Locke to change their minds, suggesting that teachers had opted for Green Dot partly out of ignorance about the district’s alternative plans for reform. What alternative plans? The district — along with the teachers union — has had decades to give students and parents a better school than Locke. Having failed to deliver, the district now owes them the chance to try something else.
THERE’S MORE, LOTS MORE
That is the great promise and potential of charters, which create laboratories for innovation, places where educators can put more money into the classroom and test educational theories — such as longer days, uniforms for students and more latitude for principals. Not all of those ideas will work, but if the district welcomes rather than fights them, it too can learn and adapt.
Instead, the district has resisted change. The result: There may be genuine confusion at Locke about Green Dot, but there’s also a real atmosphere of fear at the school. After the principal attended a Green Dot meeting and spoke disparagingly of the LAUSD, he was ousted from his job and escorted from campus — ostensibly for having allowed teachers to use class time to sign the charter petition. Even if teachers didn’t read the petition carefully, that’s the sort of handwriting on the wall anyone could see.
It’s still unclear whether the teachers at Locke can rescind their signatures. One lesson Green Dot should take from this is that it must ensure that teachers truly are informed about the changes coming their way when they sign a charter petition. State statutes, however, clearly give school boards authority to deny charter applications if there aren’t enough signatures. The current school board still has the chance to get this right. If it cannot bring itself to supervise a fair process, it should defer final judgment on Locke’s petition and turn this matter over to a board that will — the new school board.
Last week I asked one of the Green Dot higher-ups how the Locke situation was going. He responded with a single word. “DOGFIGHT.” Yeah, no kidding. (Lovely modeling the LAUSD folks are providing for the young minds watching this mess play out. Just lovely.)
Just ‘lovely?’ No, typical. So blessedly typical it borders on the banal. I’ve watched this little drama play out over, and over again. The plot line for this one has a few innovations to separate it from the norm here, but the outcome (so far) is the same. It’s discouraging to say the least.
I wonder where the leverage was placed? District on the teacher’s union, on the teachers? Or, Teacher’s union on the teachers? Or, district on the teachers? In situations here it’s usually the district that puts on the brakes by denying the charter. Then, it’s up to the parents to threaten a lawsuit against the district. With the teachers in the middle, LAUSD has a slightly different scenario playing out. Or, maybe that’s the way Green Dot has to play ball, to be able to play at all.
Charters here bypass the whole deal by setting up a separate entity which must have approval from the district (and, there aren’t too many avenues the district has to block the application), and then the teachers are hired by the charter’s governing board. I suppose Green Dot has a mechanism for teachers to remain in the union and/or at Locke, which is how the district can get leverage. Here, that’s one more string that gets cut right off the bat. Unfortunate. I wonder how much leverage the parents can bring to bear at this stage. Maybe not much. Talk about being at the mercy of “the system.”
LA’s schools will always be a mess. Move to the suburbs and leave your problems behind.
[…] the Empire Struck Back. Furious union and district officials met with teachers, then bullied, hectored and scared the […]