Books Writers and Writing

WLA’s Last-Gasp-of-Summer Reading List

summer-reading1

These are sobering times.
The Station fire, the largest fire in LA County history, has been deemed to be arson. It has cost the County of Los Angeles $21 million to fight, with that dollar amount still rising. Worse, it has cost us the lives of two deeply admired firefighters (I will have another story about Ted Hall, Arnie Quinones, and the Mt. Gleason Camp situation next week.) in addition to incinerating more than 60 homes, and around 250 miles of the Angeles National Forest.

Meanwhile, the California budget is still such a nightmare that we’re looking to donuts to save us.

Plus many of our nation’s lawmakers, democrats prominently included, appear to be in some form of indentured servitude to the health care industry….

And Afghanistan is looking so disastrously quagmire-ish that even a few Republicans are now suggesting a cut-and-run policy and non-alarmist journalists and commentators are starting to use the V word.

….And the American embassy in that same benighted country is being guarded by depraved, drunken and witless American rent-a-thugs, who also happen to be heavily armed—and paid handsomely for their hideous behavior with our tax dollars..

ON THE OTHER HAND, Labor Day is upon us—which means it is our last chance for a long summer weekend that might conceivably involve recreational reading.

So, for one a brief and shining moment, let us set aside the aforementioned troubling issues—and talk about good beach books.

I’ll have other, more serious books to recommend in the coming days and weeks, but for now, here’s my personal short list of beach, pool and airplane-worthy reading.

(And after mine, I want to hear yours. Deal? okay, deal.)

In no particular order:


1. Stieg Larrson’s The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo and The Girl Who Played With Fire

These first two books of the trilogy of intellectual thrillers written by Swedish novelist Stieg Larsson are monster best sellers for perfectly good reasons. (Sadly, Larrson died suddenly in 2004, so will produce no more past the three.) They’re intelligent, and the first—The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo— is filled with many cool tidbits about the world of Swedish high finance, some of which serve as easy analogs for our own recent financial debacles. The second book is sequined with its another pleasing array of arcane factoids—this time about such subjects as Olympic-class computer hacking and high-flown mathematics problems. But most importantly, both books feature, along with muckraking financial journalist, Mikael Blomkvist, the glorious literary creation that is Lisbeth Salander, an anti-social punk-styled near-genius girl hacker who may or may not be suffering from Asperger’s. She alone is worth the price of admission.


2. The Scarecrow by Michael Connelly

There are at least five reasons to read this book: First of all, it’s a Michael Connelly novel, and one has to be terribly grumpy to live in LA and not have at least a teensy weensy soft spot for Connelly novels.. Second, its sub theme is the collapse of the newspaper business and significant chunks of the novel are set at the LA Times. Third it even manages to have an ex-Times reporter/editor turned blogger character, who is a barely disguised Kevin Roderick of LA Observed fame. (The fictional blog is called “The Velvet Coffin.”) Fourth, Michael Connelly is Bill Bratton’s favorite mystery novelist and that must mean something, right? Fifth, it’s a Michael Connelly novel. (Did I already say that?) And Connelly has grown very, very good at what he does, thus it is a comfort and a pleasure to be in his company for each successive book-length ride.


3. Into the Woods and The Likeness by Tana French

French’s two books are best read in sequence as they feature many of the same characters who assume greater or lesser importance from one book to the other. Both novels are wonderfully psychologically-nuanced police procedurals written in a literary, almost Donna Tartt-ish tone—and all set in Ireland. I liked both of them a lot.


4. Nobody Move by Denis Johnson

Denis Johnson won the National Book Award for his unfathomably beautiful Viet Nam war novel, 2007’s Tree of Smoke. Before that, he was the Next Big Literary Hope with his pared-to-the-bone book of short stories, the bleak and stunning Jesus’ Son, which first made us aware of his capacity for writing those gorgeous sentences.

But going from the 800-word, image and symbol-loaded Tree of Smoke to Chandler/Hammett-type genre fiction that is so fat-free that it is barely 200 pages, evidently confused certain reviewers—even though there is a long tradition for such genre hopping among literary types. (Most recently, John Banville did it after he won the Booker prize, albeit under another name. Kate Atkinson leaped over to genre fiction after winning the Whitbread award, and never went back. And then there is Pynchon, below.).

But there are others
who embraced the book with no confusion at all because they simply love the man’s writing, whatever structure or genre happens to contain it.

I fall into that latter category. Pick up one of his books, and maybe you will too.


5. Inherent Vice by Thomas Pynchon

It is California noir laced with so much in the way of happily outrageous 60’s/70’s stoner dialogue that it makes Cheech and Chong movies of the period seem positively abstemious in contrast, and it comes complete with its own surfer music sound track (minus the audio). (Actually, I take that back. Amazon and other sites have listed all the songs, with links to the audio when possible. When there are no links, it is because Pynchon made the song up out of whole cloth—complete with lyrics. My personal favorite in the latter category is “Soul Gidget” by Meatball Flag.)

This Pynchon book is over-the-top, occasionally deliberately anachronistic, sly, dark, funny and fabulous. Much in the way that Graham Greene wrote his “entertainments,” Pynchon has created something masterful in which even the deep, dark, philosophical points he has slipped into the genre plotting are made to seem light as cotton candy.

I never wanted it to be over.


Okay, now your turn.

45 Comments

  • An arsonist may have started the fire. Others are also responsible for its wider spread destructions and deaths.

    I told you.

    …”This brush was ready to explode,” said Los Angeles County Supervisor Mike Antonovich, whose district overlaps the forest. “The environmentalists have gone to the extreme to prevent controlled burns, and as a result we have this catastrophe today.”

    …Obtaining the necessary permits is a complicated process, and such efforts often draw protests from environmentalists.

    Biologist Ileene Anderson with the Center for Biological Diversity, an environmental organization, said burn permits should be difficult to get because of the potential damage to air quality. Clearing chaparral by hand or machine must be closely scrutinized because it can hurt native species.

    “Our air quality, for a variety of factors, doesn’t need to be further reduced by these controlled burns,” she said.

    …Los Angeles fire Capt. Steve Ruda said that pre-emptive fires were used more frequently in the region in the 1980s. But a growing backcountry population and increasingly complicated environmental rules have made them less frequent.

    Conducting a prescribed burn requires a detailed study of wind, terrain, temperature and humidity and reviews by a host of government entities, including air-quality regulators.

    Steve Brink, a vice president with the California Forestry Association, an industry group…. “Special interest groups that don’t want them to do it have appeals and litigation through the courts to stall or stop any project they wish. Consequently, the Forest Service is not able to put a dent in the problem,” Brink said.

    But, it’s easier for liberals to deny or twist the truth or call people names or ignore those who sound the alarm rather than admit the obvious and the documented truth and do something about it.

    The deaths of the firemen belong to the left-wing radical enviromentalists, who will never be tried. You defend them, try to cover up for them, and attack those who even bring up the issue. Share in the blood.

    Rather than face responsibility and demand easing of obstacles to prescribed burns, what names will you choose to call me this time?

  • Some of my favorite reading:

    This and this one and certainly this (Here’s a good one.) and finally this list of classics….

    Book publishers are agreed that more books would be sold if people had more money to buy them, more time to read them. Obvious solutions would be to make books cheaper and shorter. For most publishers either course is close to impossible. For magazine publishers who can buy the right to boil down books, the problem is not so tough.

    Book Digest, published by Joseph J. White, offers for 25¢ each month three or four condensations (5,000-8,000 words) of current books, about eight shorter condensations or excerpts from other works. Book Digest pays publishers $100 for long condensations, runs no advertisements, claims 50,000 circulation. Publishers liked the idea, for they had noted increased sales of such books as Reader’s Digest, pocket-size colossus, digested each month. — TIME, Oct. 24, 1938

    All we really needed to find out in Moby Dick was who won.

    (No romance novels for you, Celeste? I thought you liked those books with Fabio on the cover.)

  • Nelson Mandela and the Game That Made a Nation by John Carlin, about how a great leader put decades of brutal repression behind him for the nation’s greater good.

    The Day of Battle: The War in Sicily and Italy, 1943-1944 by Rick Atkinson. Detail upon power detail about an aspect of WWII that has not gotten nearly enough attention.

    Swan Peak by James Lee Burke, one of the few fiction writers I read these days.

  • Don’t forget to mention my friend the mero-mero Tony Rafael, who has a great book that’s a must read. He is alo good friends with D.Q. who was his most loyal blogging buddy.

  • Nice suggestions, RP.

    I’m an hysterical James Lee Burke fan. I read his most recent book, Rain God, but although I liked it, I didn’t love it as much as some of the others (like Swan Peak) so I didn’t put it up (as I was only putting up books from 2009).

    But, yeah, Swan Peak. Great one. Dave Robicheaux, Purcell AND Montana. The much earlier book that is the kind of set up for that, Black Cherry Blues, is the one that I tell people to try out if they want to see if they’re going to like JLB or not.

    Of his more recent books, I think that The Tin Roof Blowdown, the one about Katrina, is just staggeringly good.

    I’m telling you, I’m a total James Lee Burke groupie. Nice to find another fan. Marc Cooper loves Burke too.

  • Woody, thank you for revealing to us that a right winger probably lit the match, knowing the spread of the fire would create an avenue to vilify environmentalists.

  • Love your description of the Pynchon, Celeste. Wonder how long we’ll have to wait for his next book this time?

    Woody, much as I hate to be dragged into a political discussion here re: the Station fire which is still very real and has filled the whole basin’s air (including outside my home and window) with smoke and that gloomy pall, Antonovich shows himself to be a total jerk (again — he also opposes the “subway to the sea” for various specious reasons) in your quote, blaming the fire on environmentalists!

  • Woody, Celeste already smacked you down. Twice. Hard. Why are you such a glutton for punishment? You lost, junior. Now get back to training.

  • No, I’m not ignoring Woody. When you look at his persistence to blame this tragic event on liberals and environmentalists, you have to wonder if he lit the match. I don’t put anything past these guys anymore. They’re bringing guns to Obama rallies. The last thing we need to do is ignore people like Woody. We should instead be keeping an eye on them.

  • The Krispy Kreme idea sounds an awful lot like a good, old-fashioned bake sale, doesn’t it? Doesn’t anyone do that anymore?

  • Celeste – didn’t they teach you not to write the words “Cheech and Chong” and “abstemious” in the same sentence ?

  • Joseph, Celeste’s ignoring me would only be a “smackdown” if I was asking her for a date.

    Joe, Obama is going to tell school kids to sell Krispy Kreme donuts to raise money for health care.

    Gust, when the pro-Obama demonstrator bit off the finger of a man opposing socialized medicine and, according to you, probably carrying an AK-47, did he bite off his trigger finger? When teeth are banned, only criminals will have teeth.

  • Woody, you were told twice to read the damned articles, after having your contradictions pointed out. That’s called a beat down.

    The date comment is, uh, a little creepy, but perhaps not surprising since you spend so much time here. I hope your wife doesn’t find out you spend each day flirting with a hippie communist.

  • Biting off the finger of an obvious antagonist and taking an assault rifle to a president’s town hall meeting are not the same thing in the eyes of people living in the real world, Woody. Keep grasping at straws.

  • Joseph, to imitate Celeste, I’m telling you to read my responses to her in which I made it clear that I did read the posts – excess words and all. (Don’t they teach writers to condense their work down to their essence at Bennington?)

    Hey, does that constitute a “smackdown” on you? You guys are so pathetic and so desperate for any kind of victory, no matter how weak and pathetic.

    Now, if you can quit imitating reg, try to respond with something of substance, yourself. Tell me with a straight face that “enviromentalists” had nothing to do with the L.A. fires being less controllable because of their long-term opposition to controlled burning and resulting lawsuits and regulations.

    Oh, and you don’t have to worry about Celeste and me. I can tell that you’re jealous and worried. You’re safe to ask her out, assuming that you don’t prefer boys.

    What are you reading this weekend – some novel with Fabio on the cover?

  • Woody Says:
    September 4th, 2009 at 8:06 pm

    “Oh, and you don’t have to worry about Celeste and me.”

    Oh, don’t worry, we know we don’t.

  • # Woody Says:
    September 4th, 2009 at 8:06 pm

    “Tell me with a straight face that “enviromentalists” had nothing to do with the L.A. fires being less controllable because of their long-term opposition to controlled burning and resulting lawsuits and regulations.”

    Environmentalists had nothing to do with the L.A. fires being less controllable because of their long term opposition to controlled burning and resulting lawsuits and regulations.

    I said it.

    With a straight face.

    Oh, and just so you know, you educated conservative, you, there’s an “n” in environment, before the “m”.

  • #17 Says:
    September 4th, 2009 at 7:42 pm

    GUST – You don’t live in the “real world”. you live in Never Never Land.

    ……….

    Better than the trailer park you and your fellow birthers live in.

  • Woody, you need to calm down, son–you’re getting hysterical and shrill. Now, everyone but you has realized that Celeste put you in your place–twice. You got caught up in your contradictions, you had it pointed out to you quite clearly, you continued to contradict yourself, and then you got your tail whipped. The clock ran to zero, the teams cleared the field, and you’re still weeping at midfield pretending the game’s still on. Acceptance, boy. Time to grow up.

    Also, following up your creepy date comment with hysterics and weird personal attacks makes you look even odder–especially given your hang-ups with homosexual insults. Why on earth would you think this is an insult to call someone “gay”? Are you 13? And why are you obsessed with this “Fabio”? You’ve mentioned him twice now–some might interpret that as evidence of repressed homosexual tendencies.

    Finally, you might want to spend more time with the wifey–she can’t be too pleased with your doting on a leftist every day. Though I do understand it probably gets dull watching Braves games and going to church all the time. But c’mon–your wife can’t be that boring, right? Maybe you just need to turn off the computer and T.V. and kindle the romance with your wife, instead of looking for it elsewhere.

  • “John Moore Says:
    September 4th, 2009 at 8:50 pm

    Oh, and could the arsonist be a Jihadi terrorist?”

    My guess is he’ll be found hiding under your bed…

  • Joseph’s venom with Woody is indicative of a spectre who hovers often. In a few short paragraphs he brought his marital relationship and even questioned his sexual prefs. The whole assault is tawdry and substandard, but that’s what we’ve come to expect from the phantom troll.

  • Okay, while I appreciated being defended and all…

    …let’s change the subject. This is played out.

    I’ll put up a new post in the next hour and we can fight about that.

    (However, my fantastic, gorgeous and beautiful niece is getting married tomorrow, which means, in truth, I’m W-A-A-AAAY too happy to fight about anything.)

  • I know who started the Station the fire !!! It was the right wing tea baggers, who were responsible for the deadly Chino Prison fire. The repressed homsexual right wing baggers, led by Woody and Tony Rafael are being hunted and exposed by D.Q. and Hot Air Gust. You can read all about about it on the website L.A.EastsideRemedialRevolutionaries.com, be careful don’t let the smoke into your ass, it burns more than a menudo enema.

  • Joseph, in all seriousness, your writing style has gay written all over it. I’ve dealt with your type before and see that you deserve some bitch slapping.

  • The future of libraries?

    Cushing Academy has all the hallmarks of a New England prep school, with one exception.

    This year, after having amassed a collection of more than 20,000 books, officials at the pristine campus about 90 minutes west of Boston have decided the 144-year-old school no longer needs a traditional library. The academy’s administrators have decided to discard all their books and have given away half of what stocked their sprawling stacks – the classics, novels, poetry, biographies, tomes on every subject from the humanities to the sciences. The future, they believe, is digital.

  • If this thread hasn’t gotten completely contaminated by the usual suspects, I’ll make a suggestion – actually two:

    How the Beatles Destroyed Rock and Roll – An alternative history of American Popular Music – Elijah Wald. I just started it and am hooked. The title is intentionally overdrawn, but it’s a history of pop music that attempts to avoid the rear-view lens that colors much of the genre. Includes a lot more on what was actually popular than just what we look back on a “the good stuff.” (Tom Waits loved it…)

    Also, I’d recommend that folks read Tom Ricks’ “The Gamble: General David Petraeus and the American Military Adventure in Iraq, 2006-2008.” It’s absolutely fascinating, shows most of the conventional wisdom about “the surge” on both the left and the right to be dubious at best, and while it documents commendable effort by a very smart General to turn things around it also deepens the critique of the entire Iraq project from Day One, in conception and execution. People like Woody are impervious to any actual knowledge of events in Iraq – they live on faith-based delusions and deliberate ignorance – but any rational person, whether you supported the initial effort or thought it was completely crazy – will find Ricks’ book required in any effort to trace the contours of this epic American fiasco. (Ricks’ – who is the best chronicler so far of the military overview, will probably write a final book on Iraq in a couple of years, but the end-game isn’t hard to figure out from his first two “essential-readiing” volumes – Iran wins!)

  • Reg, How the Beatles Destroyed Rock and Roll looks great. Thanks for the suggestion. (And if Tom Waits loves it, why even hesitate? Yes, I did go and see his quote at Amazon.)

    As for The Gamble : I read it and found it to be, in many, may ways, absolutely revelatory. It is also the essential book to read (or at least among them) before having a discussion about Afghanistan.

    (I’m on a judging panel for some book awards, and am judging books of current interest, so with that in mind, I have been staying away from discussing the books that fall at all within or near that category, which I might otherwise bring up.)

    But, yes, although I think Ricks could have gone farther in certain kinds of analysis near the end of the book, it is one of the books I’ve read in the last six months that has really stayed with me and affected my thinking.

    To its great credit, it could easily offend both the right and the left, but should be welcomed by the knowledge and solution oriented among either of those sides.

Leave a Comment