Public Health Social Justice Shorts

Social Justice Shorts: 2 Cases of Professional Dodging…& More

Got-swine_flu_shots_tshirt

USC’S NEON TOMMY REPORTER CALLIE SCHWEITZER CAUSES LA’S PUBLIC HEALTH GUY TO HIDE OUT

Yes I know my pals Marc Cooper and Kevin Roderick already mentioned this, but after reading two inexcusably fact-challenged stories by so-called experienced and professional journalists, this tale of the exploits of Callie Schweitzer and her fellow Neon Tommy reporters, bears repeating and further praising.

For the past several weeks, Annenberg grad student Schweitzer and some of the other reporters working with her have been trying to have a brief conversation with L.A. County Director of Public Health Jonathan Fielding, about the county’s H1N1 deaths, and Fielding has reportedly dodged the calls.

Schweitzer and pals were working on a major package that looked at swine flu deaths across LA and analyzed what those deaths might suggest in terms of patterns.

As the main public health guy for LA, one would think that Fielding should get on the phone with the Neon Tommy reporters, given the nature of their investigation. But in any case, he didn’t. Who know, maybe he was always really, really busy.

But that’s not the weird part.

The weird part is the fact that, this past Tuesday when Neon Tommy’s Callie was booked by Warren Olney’s producers for Olney’s Which Way LA? radio show, they also booked Fielding—WHO ONLY AGREED TO BE ON THE SHOW if he was on air when Callie Schweitzer was off.

Are you serious????

Now, keep in mind WWLA? is not exactly some kind of talking heads free-for-all such as one frequently sees among the so-called “professionals” on cable TV news.

Warren runs a tight (and reasonably polite) ship. So it is not that Fielding had to worry that the intrepid grad student was going to put him in a metaphorical choke hold. (Although she is not my student, Schweitzer doesn’t strike me as the choke hold type anyway. She seems rather, you know, smart and competent.)

Now Callie Schweitzer and the Neon Tommy reporting group have written an open letter to Mr. Fielding. Which you can find right here (along with a podcast version of the WWLA? show in question).

I recommend you read the whole thing. It’ll cheer you up.

So why can I not possibly be pessimistic about the future of journalism in the face of all the massive circulation drops, layoffs and publications closings? Because of terrific young reporters like Callie Schweitzer. (This prominently includes the two classes full of smart and enthusiastic young men and women I am lucky enough to teach on Tuesdays and Fridays—at Annenberg and at UC Irvine.)



SCHWARZENEGGER COMPLIES WITH JUDGES ON PRISON POP REDUCTION—(SORT OF)

After the panel of three federal judges, led by U.S. Court Judge Thelton Henderson, rejected the state’s last proposal to comply with the panel’s requirement that the governor come up with a way to reduce California’s prison population bu 40,000 prisoners, Governor Schwarzenegger is set to submit a new plan Thursday night.

And then he plans to tell the judges that his proposed plan isn’t legal.

If the discrepancy between the first statement and the second is giving you whiplash, keep in mind that the governor’s previous plan, submitted in September (and rejected in October) instead of reducing the population by the requisite 40,000, only dropped by little more than half that much, or 23,000.

Not surprisingly, that plan didn’t work at all for Judge Henderson and company.

Plus there is also the matter of the case that Arnold and Jerry Brown have filed before the U.S. Supreme Court contending that they don’t have to comply with the 3 judges’ demands at all anyway.

Michael Rothfeld of the LA Times has a good report on the intricacies of the story.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger tonight will give federal judges a road map to reducing state prison overcrowding that involves waiving some state laws so sentencing regulations can be changed and new private prisons built.

But the governor also will disavow those solutions as illegal, said Oscar Hidalgo, a spokesman for the
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

An initial plan that Schwarzenegger submitted was rejected three weeks ago by the three judges, who threatened him with contempt of court for failing to meet their demand for a proposal to reduce the inmate population by 40,000 prisoners over two years.

With his new proposal, the governor appears to be trying to avoid open defiance of the judges without giving the impression that he is contradicting his opposition to their efforts in an appeal now pending before the U.S. Supreme Court.

The new plan, which the governor says would reduce the prison population
by 42,000 by December 2011, will heed the judges’ Oct. 21 order to identify state laws that they would need to suspend to meet their goal.

Yet Schwarzenegger also is expected to tell the judges he does not believe it would be legal for them to waive those laws. He contends that it is improper for the federal courts to intrude into the state’s affairs.


DOUGLAS RING

Real estate investor and attorney Douglas Ring—also the former husband of city council woman, Cindy Miscikowski, was found dead in his Brentwood home Thursday. Police are investigating Ring’s death as a possible suicide.


LEGISLATING CHRISTMAS

A new initiative that may or may not be headed for next year’s ballot would require—-not allow, require—California public schools to have their students sing Christmas carols.

The LA Times’s editorial handles the militantly batty matter with exactly the right touch. Here’s a representative clip:

Merry Susan Hyatt, the substitute teacher who is spearheading the petition drive, is optimistic that she can garner the 434,000 signatures required to put the initiative on the ballot. “We got 25 signatures in just two nights,” she gushed to the New York Times. At that rate, we can expect the Christmas carol referendum in about 95 years — assuming those Grinches at the American Civil Liberties Union don’t sidetrack it in the courts. (It is, of course, blatantly unconstitutional, favoring as it does not only religion but a particular faith.)

21 Comments

  • I think it’s interesting that in response to an insane, unconstitutional proposal to REQUIRE children to sing Christmas carols in public schools, we get the usual Bull O’Reilly “victim” bullshit. Christians are not “victims” nor is there a “war on Christmas.?” Although many of them are chickenshit wimps who are so insecure in their beliefs they need to see them propped up in the public square. The early Christians would be appalled at these infantile morons.

    The courts have ruled that Christmas carols are totally appropriate in public school holiday programs. But no one can be required to sing them. Nor can their singing constitute a religious worship service in the context of a public school. Anyone who wants to go beyond this and require religious worship in public schools is, frankly, “un-American.”

    My father was a very devout, old-school pastor out of the German Evangelical tradition (which is very different from the fundamentalist morons who call themselves “evangelicals” today and are peddling infantile, self-serving versions of Christianity) and he felt strongly that the essentially secularized celebration and commercialization of Christmas and all of the public displays wherein Santa Clause and Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer co-exist with “Baby Jesus” had trivialized the essential message. The ACLU, which often over-reaches in these debates, is in fact offering Christians the opportunity to reclaim Christmas as their own sacred celebration among believers rather than ritualized overindulgence and economic stimulus. I’m kind of in the middle, like most people, because I enjoy the holiday immensely, but I’m not an orthodox Christian, but having public decorations and a desperate retail industry become the most visible proponents of “Christmas” seems like it would be seen as a travesty for any Christian who is genuinely religious.

  • If you actually happen to read the Christmas initiative, you will find that it does not require any student to sing or hear Christmas Carols.

    Typical of the LA-Times, the NY-Times and WitnessLA they have all fallen for our sinister plot to provide children the opportunity to sing Silent Night by publicizing our INITIATIVE.

    Listening to, or performing, Christmas music during the holiday season is a longstanding American tradition and a significant element of our cultural heritage as Americans.

    The parents and guardians of public school children should have the right to decide whether or not their children may hear Christmas music in the classrooms and assemblies at those schools.

    Each public elementary and secondary school shall provide the parent or guardian of a pupil with written notice of the presentation or performance of Christmas music in a classroom or assembly at least 21 calendar days before that pupil would be required to be present for the presentation or performance of the Christmas music. The written notice provided to the parent or guardian shall include a tear-off slip or other method for the parent or guardian to inform the school if he or she chooses that the pupil not be present for the presentation or performance ofthe Christmas music.

    A pupil who is not present for the appreciation or performance of Christmas music pursuant to the expressed choice ofhis or her parent or guardian shall be provided with an appropriate alternative to the arts or social studies subject matter served by the Christmas music in the classroom or the cultural enrichment served by the Christmas music in a school assembly.

  • The Attorney General of California (Edmund G. Brown) has prepared the following title and summary of the chief purpose and points ofthe proposed measure:

    REQUIRES PUBLIC SCHOOLS TO OFFER CHRISTMAS MUSIC. INITIATIVE STATUTE.

    Requires public schools to offer an opportunity for students to listen to or perform Christmas music during the holiday season. Requires schools to notify students’ parents or guardians twenty-one days before the music will be played or perfolormed so that students can opt-out of listening to or performing the music. Provides that a civil lawsuit may be brought to enforce these requirements.

    Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Probably minor annual costs to school districts.

  • Why should a state initiative require anything regarding christmas carols ? It clearly requires that carols be sung – and this is just stupid. Stupid. Stupid . Stupid. Even with an opt out. What a bunch of whiny-ass wankers. Get some honest religion and quit using the state to promote your special interests. Classes and schools can integrate Christmas carols into their recognition of the holiday season any way they like already.
    Intrusive assholes. And incredibly lame.

  • Reg and the ACLU will soon try and outlaw Thanksgiving in the schools, since Thanksgiving is a religious holiday to give thanks to God.

    Soon teachers won’t be allowed to mention the “T” or “C” words during November and December.

  • I am a Christian and I’ll say: the Christmas Carol thing is both batty and unconstitutional. It is unconstitutional because it singles out Christmas (i.e. Christianity). If it allowed for this for all religions, it would be a different matter.

    On the other hand, it will make for fun squealing and howling from those who would otherwise spend their time in the truly evil ongoing attempt to remove every nanopartical of Christianity from American life.

  • X-mas was cool when I was a kid, now I just have to buy shit for other people, and get crap like socks in return. Stupid ass holiday. Give it back to Columbus. Fuck Christmas!

  • god should be banned from school. Considering today’s tests scores kids need all the time they can get reading and learning arithmetic, not singing about fictional characters.

  • Florey v. Sioux Falls School District (1980)

    “The First Amendment does not forbid all mention of religion in public schools; it is the advancement or inhibition of religion that is prohibited. …Hence, the study of religion is not forbidden “when presented objectively as part of a secular program of education.” …We view the term “study” to include more than mere classroom instruction; public performance may be a legitimate part of secular study. This does not mean, of course, that religious ceremonies can be performed in the public schools under the guise of “study.” It does mean, however, that when the primary purpose served by a given school activity is secular, that activity is not made unconstitutional by the inclusion of some religious content.”

  • I do not believe this measure to be unconstitutional, however I will give you that it is right on the edge. Also, with is measure on the ballot, it might also help get out the conservative vote.

    “Listening to, or performing, Christmas music during the holiday season is a longstanding American tradition and a significant element of our cultural heritage as Americans.”

  • “Also, with is measure on the ballot, it might also help get out the conservative vote.”

    So you’re just endorsing a nutty, admittedly “borderline unconstitutional” invocation of Jesus as a cheap measure to get out the Republican vote.

    Disgusting. I’m sure God loves ya !!!!

Leave a Comment