Board of Supervisors Probation Realignment Reentry

Probation Dept. Is Asked for Solutions to Its Realignment Problems, Comes Back with Nada to Speak of

Earlier this month, the LA County Supervisors passed a motion authored by Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas t
hat asked the county’s Probation Department to come up with some ideas as to how Probation might improve the way it was handling the more than 5000 newly-released inmates that had been handed to LA County Probation for oversight as part of the new realignment strategy mandated by AB109.

One of the purposes of realignment—in addition to saving the state money— is to rethink the idea of prisoner reentry so that those released receive appropriate rehabilitative services to aid them in succeeding on the outside, rather than simply returning to prison. This means they were supposed to be enrolled in services such as mental health and substance abuse counseling, housing referrals and job training, and other programs of that nature.

Yet, according to reports, LA’s Probation Department has thus far had a dismal record for actually getting the mandated services to those newly-released former prisoners who need them. In fact, since February, probation had reportedly only referred 60% of the former inmates that passed through its doors to services, of which only 15% actually have received treatment.

It was also noted that the Probation Department’s intake “HUBs” to which a newly released prisoner must first report, weren’t properly equipped to refer clients to many of the services necessary to begin with.

Since appropriate reentry programs and services have been shown to greatly improve an individual’s chance to avoid the revolving door back to lock-up, the supervisors moved to direct Probation to come up with some solutions for the various problems outlined, and a goal-laden plan for bringing those solutions to fruition. Plus to help matters along, the motion provided a few suggested methods that Probation might explore.

Probation’s response to the supervisors’ request was posted on Tuesday night, and it isn’t particularly heartening.

It mostly consists a list of reasons why nearly everything the supes asked them to do “isn’t feasible”—-with few if any creative counter-solutions offered.

You can take a look for yourself here.

More on this as we have a chance to analyze it further.


The LA Times’ Robert Lopez posted the story Tuesday night. Details are sketchy. Presumably we’ll know more soon.


  • Just wait until the Black-ation Department and the Stupivisors starts getting hit by numerous multi-million dollar lawsuits. When one of these Post Release PC 290 kidnaps a child and commits a heinous crime of unspeakable acts, then it would be too late to learn their lesson on their continue support of pushing an anti-conservative attitude of incarceration as the best alternative form of punishment. The Supervisors should be discussing and giving equal disscussion time to the subject of how to isolate these numerous cancer speading cells and rip them out of our communities before they cause life threatening harm. This entire discussion seems to be focusing more on how Bro-bation and the County Dumbo-visors can make the life of a criminal an all paid vacation package get-a-away to Club Méditerranée, instead of focusing on how to protect our families, our children, and start to stand up for all the silent voices of hard working LA County citizens. Seems like no one here cares anymore about the victims of violent crimes. This Post Release program seems to be going so far left with your “hug-a-thug” clique mentality that the right is being exaggeratedly over neglected – a very unfair balance. Let me put it in a better term like Mike stated, The hard working joe blow citizen of Los Angeles County is being “gang-raped” by our politicians and incompetent government departments.

Leave a Comment