RENOWNED PLAYWRIGHT ANNA DEAVERE SMITH TURNS HER CREATIVE FOCUS ON RACE AND THE SCHOOL-TO-PRISON PIPELINE
Playwright/actress Anna Deavere Smith has never been one to be scared off by complex subject matter.
When Smith premiered Twilight: Los Angeles 1992, her searing and revelatory one woman play about the aftermath of the Rodney King verdicts—first performing it in Los Angeles in 1993, then a year later in New York—reviewers fell over themselves praising the work. At the same time, they also argued with each other about whether Smith’s creation was really theater, or some strange new kind of journalism.
The confusion had to do with the fact that Smith had gathered the material for the play that would make her a critical success by interviewing nearly 300 people, many of whom had some direct connection to the riot, some of whom did not. Then, from those interviews, she shaped monologues for more than 40 “characters,” real people whom she inhabited on stage, one after the other, with eerie accuracy.
The parts she played included former LAPD chief Daryl F. Gates, a south LA teenager, one of the members of the Rodney King jury, a Beverly Hills real estate agent, a former Black Panther party head now living in Paris, truck driver Reginald Denny, the widow of a Korean American grocer killed during the madness, a pregnant cashier hit by a random bullet who managed, against odds, to save herself and her baby—and several dozen more.
All of this came together to produce what NY Times’ theater reviewer David Richards called, “an epic accounting of neighborhoods in chaos, a city in anguish and a country deeply disturbed by the violent images, live and in color, coming over the nightly airwaves.”
Now, 22 years later, Smith is working on another play that makes use of her signature form of documentary theater to illuminate another crucial cultural moment. (Smith has authored around 18 of these documentary plays thus far.) The new play, which has the working title of “The Pipeline Project,” investigates what the playwright describes as “the school-to-prison pipeline—the cycle of suspension from school to incarceration that is prevalent among low-income Black, Brown, Latino, and Native-American youth.”
As she did with Twilight, for the last year or so, Smith has been interviewing hundreds of people including students, teachers, parents, police, thought and policy leaders, psychologists, community activists, heads of prisons, people who are incarcerated, kids in juvenile hall, public defenders…and many more, as she fashions her theatrical characters.
Smith said that she got the idea after educators and reformers approached her to see if art could affect policy change. And so: The Pipeline Project.
Most recently, she has been performing pieces of the work-in-progress at select regional theaters in Berkeley, CA, Baltimore, MD, and Philadelphia, PA. Then after each performance, Smith engages in an extended dialogue with the audience, sort of town hall meeting style, all of which she uses to continue to recalibrate her material.
Eventually Smith will have a full length theater piece, that she’ll debut around the country.
In the meantime, Californians will have the opportunity to see the work-in-progress version starting this coming Saturday, July 11, when Smith will begin previews at Berkeley Rep’s Roda Theatre. This pre-play play will run through August 2.
Robert Hurwitt of the San Francisco Chronicle talked to Smith while she was in rehearsal for her Berkeley opening, about what she wants from this part of the process, and from the Pipeline Project as a whole.
Here’s a clip:
“This is one of those rare moments when people do begin to think about race relations in this country,” Anna Deavere Smith says over the phone from Berkeley Repertory Theatre, where she’s in rehearsal for the premiere run of her latest solo piece. The new work, with the complicated but accurate title “Notes From the Field: Doing Time in Education, the California Chapter” is about the treatment of African American and other disadvantaged youth in our schools and what’s increasingly being called the school-to-prison pipeline.
“I started thinking seriously about these matters in 2010, and I started my work, my interviews in 2013,” Smith says. “A lot has happened very quickly in this country during that time. … You can’t really think about inequities in education without looking at the broader canvas of racial inequity in America. And you can’t think about school discipline without thinking about the ways in which the types of discipline that are of greatest concern mimic some of the practices in prisons.
“So it’s a problem, and it’s an opportunity. I did my first staged readings of this piece here at the Rep last July and left town and — boom! Ferguson. And just since then, because of technology, Americans have watched any number of bad interactions between authority and young African American males, and these videos have taken the country by storm and have caused a lot of people to go, ‘Wait. What? Something’s going on here about men of color. What is this? Wow! Whoa! No! How could that happen?’”
Notes from the Field: Doing Time in Education, the California Chapter: Previews begin Saturday, July 11. Opens July 14. Through Aug. 2. $25-$89. Berkeley Rep’s Roda Theatre, 2015 Addison St., Berkeley. (510) 647-2949. www.berkeleyrep.org.
AND IN OTHER NEWS….THE LA TIMES EDITORIAL BOARD LOOKS AT HISTORY & CALLS FOR REAL OVERSIGHT OF THE LOS ANGELES SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT
The LA Times editorial board has called for a civilian commission with teeth before, but this time the board lays out the absolutely dismal history of attempts to oversee the department, all of which have failed utterly.
Let us hope the LA County Board of Supervisors are paying attention.
Here’s a clip:
Los Angeles County has a commission created more than a half century ago, that is tasked with monitoring jail conditions and holding government accountable for improper treatment of inmates. As reports circulated in recent years of inmate beatings and abuse at the hands of sheriff’s deputies, the Sybil Brand Commission for Institutional Inspections failed to find or act on the pattern of brutality that has resulted in the county paying millions of dollars in verdicts and settlements, the resignation last year of Sheriff Lee Baca the indictment this year of former Undersheriff Paul Tanaka (among others), the convictions of several deputies for obstruction of justice, and the ongoing criminal investigations into inmate mistreatment. It instead reported accomplishments such as commending the sheriff for his cooperation during jail inspections.
Following reports of numerous improper uses of force by deputies more than two decades ago, the Board of Supervisors hired special counsel Merrick Bobb, who regularly reported on problems in the jails and elsewhere in the department; but the board, distracted by other emergencies and concerns, took little action on Bobb’s recommendations. The board abolished his office just over a year ago.
In 2001, in response to concern that abusive deputies were not facing meaningful discipline, the county created an Office of Independent Review to provide civilian oversight of the discipline process. But in order to get access to confidential sheriff files, the office agreed that such documents would be privileged, and in so doing it became in essence the department’s attorney, and wound up providing in-house advice rather than actual oversight. That office, too, was abolished last year.
Those efforts illustrate the two primary avenues of failure in oversight of the sheriff’s department. The supposedly independent overseer either is absorbed into the sheriff’s world, as with the Office of Independent Review, or becomes an agent of the Board of Supervisors, ineffectual like the Sybil Brand Commission or else too easily ignored, given the board’s many duties and political pressures, like the Office of Special Counsel.
There is an urgent need for a new model that does not replicate those that so utterly failed during the jail abuse scandal. The oversight body must have sufficient independence from both the board and the sheriff, sufficient access to department documents to perform its task, sufficient standing to apply political pressure in cases when the sheriff refuses to cooperate, and sufficient professionalism and restraint to avoid becoming a runaway tribunal.
To design such a model, the Board of Supervisors appointed a panel to consider various possibilities and make recommendations. The Working Group on Civilian Oversight completed its report late last month. It falls woefully short.
LAPD’S MODEL MENTAL HEALTH UNIT IS THE NATION’S LARGEST
While, it doesn’t magically solve every single problem, with 61 sworn officers and 28 mental health workers, the Los Angeles Police Department’s mental evaluation unit is the largest mental health policing program of its kind in the nation and, by all accounts, it’s doing a lot of good, both in helping take the pressure off patrol officers while, most importantly, aiding in productive and appropriate resolutions, rather than harmful outcomes, for the city’s mentally ill.
According to LAPD spokespeople, the unit has become a vital resource for the city’s 10,000-person police force.
NPR’s Stephanie O’Neil has a good new story on the unit and how it functions.
Here’s a clip:
Officer Ted Simola and his colleagues in the unit work with county mental health workers to provide crisis intervention when people with mental illness come into contact with police.
On this day, Simola is working the triage desk on the sixth floor at LAPD headquarters. Triage duty involves helping cops on the scene evaluate and deal with people who may be experiencing a mental health crisis.
Today, he gets a call involving a 60-year-old man with paranoid schizophrenia. The call is typical of the more than 14,000 fielded by the unit’s triage desk last year.
“The call came out as a male with mental illness,” says the officer on the scene to Simola. “I guess he was inside of a bank. They said he was talking to himself. He urinated outside.”
If it were another department, this man might be put into the back of a police car and driven to jail, so that the patrol officer could get back to work more quickly. But LAPD policy requires all officers who respond to a call in which mental illness may be a factor to phone the triage desk for assistance in evaluating the person’s condition.
Officer Simola talks to the officer on the scene. “Paranoid? Disorganized? That type of thing?” The officer answers, “Yeah, he’s talking a lot about Steven Seagal, something about Jackie Chan.” Simola replies, “OK, does he know what kind of medication he’s supposed to have?” They continue talking.
The triage officers are first and foremost a resource for street cops. Part of their job entails deciding which calls warrant an in-person visit from the unit’s 18 cop-clinician teams. These teams, which operate as second responders to the scene, assisted patrol in more than 4,700 calls last year.
Sometimes their work involves high-profile interventions, like assisting SWAT teams with dangerous standoffs or talking a jumper off a ledge. But on most days it involves relieving patrol officers of time-consuming mental health calls like the one Simola is helping to assess.
The man involved in this call has three outstanding warrants for low-grade misdemeanors, including public drinking. Technically, any of them qualifies him for arrest. But Simola says today, he won’t be carted off to jail.
“He’ll have to appear on the warrants later,” Simola says, “but immediately he’ll get treated for his mental health.”
AMENDMENTS TO JUVIE SOLITARY BILL DON’T SWAY CRITICS
The bill to drastically restrict solitary confinement for California ‘s locked up kids, has one more committee to make it through, and then it goes to the assembly floor and, if passed there, on to the governor.
The bill’s author, Senator Mark Leno, has tried to address some of the concerns of the bill’s opponents, with a set of amendments, but so far they’ve not done the trick writes Kelly Davis for The Crime Report.
Here’s a clip:
In response to opposition from county probation unions and California’s influential prison guard union, Leno has agreed to several amendments since the legislation was first introduced in February. The most recent amendment allows a youth to be confined beyond four hours if he can’t be safely re-integrated into the general population.
But the amendments have not appeared to sway the critics.
At the committee hearing, Craig Brown, a lobbyist with the California Correctional Peace Officers Association, argued that the Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ), which runs California’s four juvenile correctional facilities, has implemented numerous reforms over the last several years, including significant reductions the use of confinement. In 2004, the DJJ, then called the California Youth Authority, entered into a consent decree with the Prison Law Office after documented cases of young people being kept in solitary confinement—sometimes in cages—for 23 hours a day.
Leno’s bill would add another layer of regulations and “mess up all that progress” Brown said.
There are currently no laws governing the use of juvenile solitary confinement in California.
The lack of regulations has played a role in at least four lawsuits-—the one filed against the Prison Law Office against the DJJ, and three subsequent lawsuits against county probation departments.
The problem with the past supposed oversight for the Sheriff’s Department was misinterpreted for OVERLOOKING the misdeeds of deputies.
Only now is the Sheriff’s Department held to answer largely in part due to exposure of corruption. The corruption is not new…..only the exposure.
I can’t blame Smith for providing her sthick to the usual coustomers (liberal whites, you know the type who watch NPR.) I Imagine Smith makes a pretty fair living peddling this nonsense that white liberals find so fashionable. The latest gimmick , the school to prison pipeline nonsense ,does however give me pause. I doubt the school systems that are kicking out a disproportionate number of “children of color “are rabid racists. More like they are trying to maintain some level of order in an already failing system. The ones certin to suffer will be the children and teachers already stuck in terrible schools, imagine if they won’t be able to rid themselves of the worst troublemakers. One thing for certain , the liberals who would push this agenda don’t send their kids to these schools and won’t have to deal with the consequences .
#1: I think you hit THAT nail on the head: the best LASD Overseer is a well informed electorate which, in the past, has never really been the case.
That brings up another question: whatever happened to Robert Faturechi, the reporter who covered LASD for LAT?
Is he being punished or what?
It doesn’t matter how much money or how many great ideas they come up with to fix the problem in Buzzard Hollow Kentucky. Until those hillbilly kid’s mommas and daddies decide that a quality education is more important than moonshine, fireworks and Garth Brooks CD’s those kids aren’t going to get a quality education. Until daddy would rather his son make the Honor Roll than learn how to skin a possum, it isn’t going to change. Until momma decides to sit with the kids and make sure they’re doing their homework, instead of having them go play in the creek so she can watch Jerry Springer in peace, it isn’t going to change. Until momma and daddy decide it’s more important to teach their younguns’ their letters and how to cypher than to skin a possum, shoot the flintlock and brew up the shine, all the money and great ideas in the world won’t change it.
Lack of money and a lack of great ideas is NOT the reason those hillbilly kids in Appalachia aren’t educated.
#3, Faturechi went to ProPublica, which was the LA Times’ loss. He’s hardworking, talented and I think he was just ready for a change. He’s still doing good work, just on a different topic for a different news organization.
You can find him here: http://www.propublica.org/site/author/robert_faturechi
I doubt if LASD will ever have meaningful oversight primarily because of egos and the politics of the BOS. The best oversight would be for Sheriff McD to give Max Huntsman what he wants and needs to do his job, without interference. Otherwise we go back to window dressing of an OIR who was in Baca and Tanaka’s hip pocket. Max is a standup guy who lives in the real world, not the political world. He will do the right thing if left to do his job. Of interest, Max had entered into his contract if his position fell apart or if he said screw it, I’m not playing your game, he would return directly back to the DA’s Office at his former position and pay grade as if he never left. Smart move Max, the BOS can’t even agree what to have for lunch.
The LA media watched Baca and Tanaka run LASD into the ground and said nothing because of their love affair with the progressive sheriff. Same game the media plays with Obama. Same coverup, different R.D.
Eff fetachini, good riddance.
@. Being a consistent reader of Witness LA. I don’t contribute my beliefs or opinions (mainly questions) that often. With that being said, I must admit that reading your comments and self expertise from LASD’S Pandora’s Box to Ferguson Missouri’s “looting & shooting” to Baltimore’s Police Department and riots, now to Kentucky…..I query as to who in the hell are you attempting to emulate, Huck Finn or Forrest Gump? Dude, you’re killing me.
Maybe the L.A. Times should write an article explaining where they were during the years it took the LASD debacle to unfold. Maybe the Times should explore their own bias. Why did the Times so stubbornly ignore what was going on in their own back yard? Was it because Baca was a friend of high profile Uber hispanic politician Gloria Molina and a Hispanic himself? Was it because he was always spewing all that politically correct rhetoric the Times loves so much? (Who cares if it sounded like the ramblings of a Alzheimer’s patient). Or were they film-flamed by the lawyer team turned county trough feeders Bob and Gennaco? In the end it doesn’t matter. The Times was MIA ,it took a small time blog called Witness LA to finally shame the Times (and everyone else for that matter) into action.
I have a lot more faith in blogs like Witness La that actually practice the first amendment than big media or one more layer of bureaucracy .
@ Nicobar. For you and anyone who did not know, Hispanic or not….Baca and Gloria Molina were not friends, nor were they on friendly terms.
@ 8&9, LMAO, best post this week!
Don’t worry. I’ll wait for you to figure it out.
Nice to see another long time observer that doesn’t comment often. Now that’s discipline!!!!!!
BTW, I have never claimed to have any expertise concerning the topics you mentioned in #8. That would be silly. Those aren’t topics that relate to science. Those topics relate strictly to opinions. Interesting how when I provide my opinion you try and portray me as claiming I’m an expert. Wierd.
The Los Angeles Times is / was out only for the ratings & recognition, regardless of subject(s). This can be said for any major news outlet.
You couldn’t be more on the mark than your last paragraph. You nailed it. They were in love with the New Age Progressive One. They turned a blind eye for as long as they could get away with it regarding Baca’s outrageous bullshit. They do the same with Obama. The LA media isn’t watch dogs for the people. They are the guard dogs of progressives.
Yes it was because Baca was always spewing PC bullshit they love so much. Yes it was because he’s a Hispanic. All Baca had to do was preach the right message and the media was sympathetic to him. They weren’t about to dare being politically incorrect by defaming the first Hispanic sheriff since Biscaluiz.
BTW, your obs about the Alzheimer’s patient is one for the ages. #’8 wins post of the week. Your comment about Baca’s ramblings wins comment of the month!
Tom Angel appointed to Chief (out of retirement) as Sheriff’s Office Chief of Staff, Victor Allende promoted to captain, Elier Morejon promoted to captain.
@16 You left off Paula Tokar to Captain. Tanaka loyalists all, with the exception of Angel. Who is vetting these people, Buddy Goldman? What’s next, Nee and Hebert to Commander? If this is what reform looks like, we are doomed!
@17- the exception you point out (Angel) is a dinosaur that predates the PT era. He was a Baca loyalist from the old Temple camp along with Waldie and Stonich, yet Mc D. brought him back to do the vetting?! Why not just resurrect the whole remaining living Baca crew? Obviously, the new boss has no faith in the current outstanding members of the department who got passed over for simply failing to kiss ass and refused to sell their souls to achieve rank. LOL … This is a slow motion train wreck.
What’s next? Big Red has not renewed her contact so Fender is hanging around for a third star. Although Parra thinks Fender is too old and it should be him.
Both Fender and Parra should be relieved of duty for their participation in Pandora’s Box and the subsequent cover up. I can see how Parra, the main bootlicker of the Tanaka cigar coin crowd, is just being true to his nature: gotta keep climbing that ladder, just another rung, right? It’s time for Parra to quit deluding himself into believing that his subordinates admire him for achieving his lofty position based on his merits.
Fender is an entirely different animal, but shares that love affair with himself just like Parra. It’s amazing how someone with a HS diploma can advance so far with so little achievements, unless one counts subordinate 924’s as a hallmark of career success. With more than 40 years on the books, Fender works for free, or perhaps even pays slightly to come to work. What drives him to come to work for a job that doesn’t pay? Ego, plain and simple. Retirement, which means no more red carpet treatment, the honey-do list, loss of alibis, and being accountable 24/7 to family must really freak the hell out of this man.
Both chiefs represent all that is wrong with custody division. They are responsible for permitting Pandora’s Box, a degradation of rule of law, managerial incompetence, and promoting supervisory retaliation. Big Red only exacerbated the problems by simply looking the other way, when she had the opportunity to affect real change.
McDonnell needs to clean house everywhere, and custody would be a very good start. Judging by his promotions of cigar-coin holding Tanakites, he’s missing the mark horribly.
@ 8. The more that character “Oh Well” comments, the more I see him as the “Brian Williams” of this blog.
Definitely an attention getter in the worst way. Hilarious
@ 19 Barrantes, Mannis, Betkey (I could go on and on) would disagree that Fender is too old. Not sure what part of 100% they can’t seem to grasp.
Try some salve with some aloe vera in it and a couple of Aleve. That should alleviate the the throbbing in your gluteus maximus.
It’s plain to see you’re butt hurt over the previous spanking I gave you. While staring at the picture of you and Leroy from the good ol’ days say to yourself: “Don’t worry friend, I’ve still got your back”. Then let your mind wander off to LaLa Land like your hero did.
Between that and the meds, the pain should be tolerable.
@LATBG, you are right on the money with your statement, Fender and Para need to go. I know staff members on the 8th floor. Their words, not mine, is the overall consensus is Para is a pig, they have zero respect for him, he does what’s good for Para and his new found love De’ Jur, and has bamboozled the Sheriff. Para has been a LONG term Tanaka supporter, bag man and enabler. As for Fender, promoted by Cavanaugh way over his capability and hangs around so he can pick 924 fruit all day long. Your other comments are a bull’s eye, well said, very observant.