Freedom of Information Government Prison

Sunshine: the Sequel—Blackout Behind Bars

Pelican Bay State Prison


If there was ever an American institution sorely in need of press scrutiny,
it’s the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

California’s prison system is the third largest in the world—and the most troubled in the nation. Riots, brawls and lengthy “lock-downs” take place with regularity in nearly every California facility. Drastic overcrowding forces 16,300 of the system’s 170,000 inmates to bunk permanently in gyms and dayrooms. Huge prison gangs operate with impunity. The CDCR’s health care system is now in federal receivership because of at least 64 “preventable” deaths, and conditions that the judge who ordered the Fed takeover described as “often outright depravity.”

And, with the highest recidivism rate in the U.S., it seems fairly clear that, despite the recent addition of “Rehabilitation” to the department’s name, California prisons don’t rehabilitate anyone. “People are consistently coming out worse than they’re going in,” said Barry Krisberg, president of the National Council on Crime and Delinquency.

This year Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger plans to spend approximately $9 billion on his frighteningly broken prison system. With a price tag that amounts to nearly $225 per California resident, it would seem fair that the public has the right to know if its money is being used wisely. But that, of course, would require aggressive media inquiry. Instead, reporters are prevented in nearly every possible legal way from getting access to the prisons and their inmates:

For instance, it takes months for journalists to get permission to enter a prison or to interview an inmate—if they are given access at all. Face-to-face interviews between journalists and specific prisoners are all but forbidden. Those interviews that are (occasionally) approved must be with inmates picked at random—no one specific—and are monitored by prison officials. Reporters are also typically forbidden from taking cameras, video equipment, or tape recorders inside the prison with them. Frequently they are even denied the use of a pen and notebook. The result, said the Society of Professional Journalists, is that many newspapers have mostly given up trying to cover California’s prisons.

Nevertheless, reports of prisoner abuse, neglect and other illegalities leak out with unsettling frequency through phone calls and visits with families, and to a few reporters, like myself, who receive regular collect calls from inmates. But without access, the allegations, if true, are nearly impossible to prove.

It wasn’t always thus. Up until 1995, reporters had reasonable access to prisons and inmates. But after a series of stories about various scandals—among them reports out of Pelican Bay and Corcoran prisons, that guards were staging inmate “gladiator” fights, often betting on the outcome and then, when the fights got out of control, of shooting the inmates involved—former Governor Pete Wilson took a kill-the-messenger approach to media relations and imposed new regulations that effectively shut the press out.

Since then, the state legislature has tried on multiple occasions to institute more moderate access rules—only to face a veto each time at the governor’s desk. The most recent such bill, sponsored by State Senator Gloria Romero, sailed through both houses this past summer—its 78-to-1 vote in the state Assembly, a near miracle of lawmaker cooperation.. But when the bill got to Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s desk, he again vetoed it. This time in his veto message, Arnold stated that the press should be barred, because if allowed in they would “glamorize murderers and thereby once again traumatize crime victims and their families.”

I heard the same excuse two years ago, when I was among a group of reporters who interviewed two high ranking prison administrators. “We don’t want you making Charlie Manson any more famous than he is,” they said.

Right. Sure, we replied. That’s what we’re all dying to do.

And now here we are the middle of National Sunshine Week—seven glorious days devoted to discussing the damage wrought by government secrets. With that in mind, I’d suggest we ask ourselves—and California’s governor—if the state’s prisons have gotten better or worse since 1995 when the press was shut out.

It’s an easy question…..and the answer isn’t pretty.

10 Comments

  • Arnold stated that the press should be barred, because if allowed in they would “glamorize murderers and thereby once again traumatize crime victims and their families.”

    Hey, he knows the press pretty well. When you do an article on the poor living conditions for rapists, murderers, child molesters, etc., add a footnote about their victims.

    I would like to see more on the prisons so that people who are thinking about crimes can see just how bad prison can be.

    However, this information does nothing to assure me that prison can also be about rehabilitation when it is more about survival.

  • Anyone who doesn’t know that American Prisons are hellholes probably belongs in mental institutions. Here is all you need to know. Those MPs who were running Abu Gharib were from a reserve unit comprised, mainly, of “Corrections Officers” from Pennsylvania and West Virginia. Wonder what they did on their day jobs?

    Everyone likes to “Get Tough” on criminals and I bet I’d get a big majority tomorrow for an initiative mandating stiff sentences for, oh, name your offense, for twelve year olds and up. Don’t want to coddle anyone after all!

    Of course no one seems to notice that, sooner or later, these little dears will be back on the street ready to show their gratitude to us for the tuition provided at Cocoran or Soledad. But that’s “Touchy feely” stuff, right?

    And the media? Would they even want to look? And take reporters away from Anna Nichole? Are you crazy?

  • Oh, no! The corrections officers who ran Abu Ghraib are the same ones running prisons here?! If we could sneak a peek into U.S. prisons, we’d probably find convicts running around with underwear placed on their heads. (It’s amazing how everything can come back to Iraq.) Why don’t we just go back to the system of prisons that we had under Bill Clinton, since he was so perfect?

  • As a matter of fact, Woody, Richard’s right on two counts.

    What those law-and-order folks who push for harsher treatment inside prisons fail to remember is that OVER 95% OF THOSE INCARCERATED eventually return to the community. So if guys have already demonstrated that they’re having trouble being productive members of society, is it really in our best interest—and in the interest of public safety—to damage them further? I mean, speaking strictly from a cost/benefit perspective.

    And, about Abu Ghraib—when the scandal broke and George Bush made his statement about, “That’s not what we do in America…” those of us who cover criminal justice issues rolled our eyes. Because too often it IS what happens in American prisons. I’d like to tell you that, at least, in California, the guards don’t use black hoods when they misbehave….but then again…

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/1999/04/06/60II/main41867.shtml

    (Check out the fourth paragraph.)

  • The California prison system is a scandal. I don’t understand why the press can’t draw attention to the fact that this administration is shutting them down. If they can’t get to the story, the story is; they are being denied access. In a free society this is intolerable. Can any administration just decide what it does and does not want scrutinized? Why would that work in this country?

  • I do not understand what journalists are complaining about; there are currently 139 in prison, with 49 of them being internet journalists. How much access do they want?

    Some other journalists have gotten into the spirit by assisting prisoners in their escape attempts: “The 25-year-old inmate was being interviewed inside CLINTON Correctional Facility by Zone when he grabbed her and put a (HER) pen to her throat at 2:20 p.m.”

  • I just feel so bad for those poor victims. Not the victims of the inmates’ crimes, but the inmates themselves. So unfortunate…if only someone hadn’t forced them to commit their crimes and end up in prison…

  • I have worked at California Men’s Colony in SLO for over a year now as an R.N. Very nice to see what you’ve been up to, Celeste.

  • Well since none of them did anything wrong except get caught lets just let them all go…heck fire, after all, if we just “hug” them surely they’ll stop manufacturing and using drugs and committing violent crimes right…? yes that’s it, thank you soooo much for showing me the light… now I can connect the dots to Abu g. I can simply blame Bush and get those poor, poor victims out of those awful prisons and take them to the polls… yes, lets tear down the prisons we have a much better solution… now lets all chant; “hugs for thugs”, “hugs for thugs”…

Leave a Comment