CDCR LA County Board of Supervisors LA County Jail LASD Mental Illness Prison Reentry Restorative Justice Sheriff John Scott

Program Helps Kids in CA Lockup Repay Victims While Learning a Trade…LASD to Propose Early Release Risk Assessment Program…Sheriff Candidate Updates…and More

PROGRAM IN CALIFORNIA YOUTH FACILITY ALLOWS KIDS TO LEARN TECH INDUSTRY WHILE EARNING MONEY AND PAYING BACK VICTIMS

Through a tech business program called Merit Partners operating in a California juvenile facility, kids receive training and experience in the tech industry while repaying victims. The program at N.A. Chaderjian Youth Correctional Facility gives kids a way to take responsibility for their crimes, and becomes a healing process for many young participants.

Workers earn $8.00 an hour recycling and reselling electronics. Twenty percent of the money they earn goes into a victim fund, another portion to their own restitution fines. The rest goes into a savings account to help kids learn about personal finances and budgeting, and to help them get on their feet when they leave “Chad.”

Alice Daniel has the story for KQED’s California Report podcast. Here’s a small clip from the transcript:

Michael Casaglio introduces himself and some of his colleagues at Merit Partners, an environmentally certified electronic recycling business that’s located within the walls of the N.A. Chaderjian Youth Correctional Facility. There’s floor leader Terrance Turner, upcoming floor leader Jordan Rutkes and IT tech Chandler Luce.

“Cables, wires, computers, laptops, computer chips, motherboards,” says Casaglio, as he reels off the types of electronic equipment they resell and recycle.

Merit Partners is the only operation of its kind in a California correctional facility. The incarcerated youth do most of the work; a small support staff trains them. The job pays $8 an hour and teaches valuable skills, Casaglio says.

It’s a far cry from his drug-dealing past. He spent his youth in and out of foster care; his own parents were addicts, he says. He smoked pot at age 9, used hard drugs at 11 and, at 15, held his gun to another dealer.

“And during the course of the robbery, somebody tried to prevent us from getting away, so I shot him five times,” says Casaglio, who has been at Chad five years.

The murder haunts him. “I took somebody’s grandparent away,” he says. “I took somebody’s husband, I took somebody’s dad, and there’s nothing I can do to repay or replace that.”

But he is giving back. Twenty percent of the money he and his peers earn goes directly to victims. The youth contribute to a local victims fund every year, and also compensate the people harmed by their crimes by paying restitution fines.

The compensation is mandatory, but 18-year-old Chandler Luce says he would donate some of his earnings to make up for his past, even if it were optional.

“You look in here, and this is a place full of people who caused harm to the world. And I was part of that,” he says.

(The clip doesn’t do it justice. Go listen to the whole story.)


LASD CONSIDERS NEW PROGRAM TO IDENTIFY LOW-RISK INMATES FOR EARLY RELEASE

The LA County Sheriff’s Department plans to propose (to the Board of Supervisors) a new system for selecting low-risk inmates for early release by predicting the likelihood of each inmate reoffending.

Currently, the state system looks only at the inmate’s last offense, and fails to take into account any previous offenses, even those of a serious nature. Critics (WLA included) have long thought that there should be a more nuanced form of risk assessment that looks at a variety of elements, rather than the broad strokes system that is presently in place.

It is therefore good news that interim Sheriff John Scott and Assistant Sheriff Terri McDonald want to try an inmate release strategy that they say will be more finely calibrated.

The LA Times’ Abby Sewell and Jack Leonard have the story. Here’s a clip:

The proposal calls for a significant shift for the nation’s largest jail system, which currently determines when inmates get released by looking at the seriousness of their most recent offense and the percentage of their sentence they have already served. Officials say the current system has weaknesses because it does not take into account the inmate’s full record, including serious crimes that occurred years ago.

Supporters argue the change would help select inmates for early release who are less likely to commit new crimes. But it might also raise some eyebrows. An older offender convicted of a single serious crime, such as child molestation, might be labeled lower-risk than a younger inmate with numerous property and drug convictions.

The Sheriff’s Department is planning to present a proposal for a “risk-based” release system to the Board of Supervisors.

“That’s the smart way to do it,” interim Sheriff John L. Scott said. “I think the percentage [system] leaves a lot to be desired.”

Assistant Sheriff Terri McDonald said at the center of the new system would be a computer program that uses each inmate’s criminal history to calculate the chance he or she will reoffend, and release those deemed lowest-risk first.

In addition to making release decisions, the tool could be used to assign inmates to education and treatment programs while in jail, and to decide which are eligible for alternatives to jail such as home confinement.

“It’s more sophisticated to look at risk,” she said. “It makes common sense to most people.”

The department could choose to override the automated risk scores for inmates convicted of certain crimes, but McDonald said it’s too early to say whether it would.

The Sheriff’s Department has not calculated the cost of the system but hopes to seek bids on the project soon if the Board of Supervisors approves.

(Read more about the proposed program, and how Riverside County is faring with its own version of early-release risk assessment.)


GETTING TO KNOW LA SHERIFF CANDIDATE JAMES HELLMOLD

KPPC’s Frank Stoltze has a new profile of LA County Sheriff hopeful James Hellmold (currently an assistant sheriff) that’s worth reading. Here’s how it opens:

A few years ago, when James Hellmold commanded L.A. County Sheriff’s deputies in the gang-riddled Lynwood area, he drew the ire of some colleagues.

“They had a legitimate question,” Hellmold recalled. “Why [was I] speaking at a gang member’s funeral?”

Hellmold attended the services for 25-year-old Branden Bullard, who’d been shot by rival gang members, to focus, he said, not on the “the negativity” in the young man’s life, but on the good things.

“In more recent days he had mentored some kids who were athletes, and trying to stay away from gangs.”

When the questions persisted from deputies, Hellmold challenged them.

“I asked them what they’ve done to help somebody else.”

Hellmold, 46, now one of four assistant sheriffs in the sprawling L.A. County Sheriff’s Department, seems just as interested in lending a hand to the needy as handcuffing criminals. Asked for a war story from the streets, he doesn’t talk about the time he shot an armed bank robber. He tells of taking foster kids to UCLA football games….

And as for the ongoing, controversial department issues, Hellmold says he is in favor of more civilian oversight, but denies the notion of “systemic misconduct” within the LASD:

“There have been some mistakes made, and there are some more reforms that need to occur,” Hellmold said. “But it is not true that there’s systemic misconduct happening.”

Hellmold once served as a personal assistant and driver for Baca. He owes his rise in the department in part to the retired sheriff and to another candidate, former undersheriff Paul Tanaka. They groomed and promoted him. Baca and Tanaka also faced scathing criticism in a blue ribbon report for failing to stop abuses in the jails. But Hellmold remains reluctant to criticize them publicly.

“It’s very trendy right now to jump on the bandwagon of talking negative of Undersheriff Tanaka,” Hellmold said. “But we can’t deny some of the good things that he’s done for the department.”

Author Joe Domanick, who has written extensively on law enforcement in Los Angeles, wonders how much an insider like Hellmold can reform the agency.

“If he’s risen that high in the department, it’s a rare bird indeed who hasn’t been part of the problem,” said Domanick, adding that Hellmold likely wouldn’t have the big picture view of the department a candidate from outside the agency would bring.

“He’s part of that culture,” Domanick noted. “He’s trained to think, and act within the culture of that department.”


IN OTHER SHERIFF CANDIDATE NEWS: CALIFORNIA AG KAMALA HARRIS THROWS HER SUPPORT BEHIND JIM MCDONNELL

Late last week, California Attorney General Kamala Harris announced her endorsement of Long Beach Police Chief Jim McDonnell in the Los Angeles Sheriff race.

Here’s a small clip from AG Harris’ announcement:

“Chief Jim McDonnell is an excellent choice, and the best choice to lead the Sheriff’s Department into a new era,” Harris said. “McDonnell has the integrity, experience and professionalism necessary to protect public safety and earn the trust of the people of Los Angeles.”



FEDERAL ATTENTION ON STAFF RESPONSE TO SUICIDES BY MENTALLY ILL INMATES IN CALIFORNIA PRISONS

Questionable handling of two successful suicide attempts by mentally ill inmates in California prisons has prompted internal investigations and caught the attention of U.S. District Judge Lawrence K. Karlton (also on the three-judge panel enforcing California’s prison population reduction).

In both instances, guards would not allow medical staffers to enter the cell and attempt to intervene or revive the inmate.

Judge Karlton has held hearings on the treatment of mentally ill prisoners, and will address one of the two incidents in a court session today (Monday).

The Sacramento Bee’s Sam Stanton and Denny Walsh have the story. Here’s a clip:

At 6:10 a.m. on Oct. 15, a medical technician handling the morning “pill pass” at Pleasant Valley State Prison in Fresno County spotted inmate David Scott Gillian hanging inside cell No. 164 from a bedsheet tied to an air vent.

“Gillian is hanging in his cell,” the tech called to a nearby guard, then rushed off to grab the “cut down scissors” and begin the process – mandatory under corrections department policy – of trying to revive the inmate through cardiopulmonary resuscitation, according to an internal department review of the incident.

Guards and medical staff converged at the cell door, according to the internal report. A sergeant and the medical technician entered the cell where Gillian was housed alone and found no pulse or signs of breathing.

“We need to cut him down, we need to do CPR,” the tech told the sergeant.

Instead, the sergeant refused, according to the review team report; he ordered the cell door closed and locked, even after a doctor and another medical staffer demanded they be allowed to perform CPR. Gillian, 52, would remain hanging for nearly four hours before he was cut down.

The confidential corrections department report, obtained by The Sacramento Bee, summarizes the findings of a suicide review team assigned to investigate Gillian’s death. All suicides in California state prisons are reviewed by a team of corrections officials. The report obtained by The Bee, based on the review team’s interviews with prison staff and inmates, chronicles events leading up to and following Gillian’s hanging.

Gillian’s death has sparked a series of internal investigations at the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. In the review team report, corrections officials investigating the suicide express “several concerns” about the circumstances. Among the concerns cited: that prison guards prevented medical staffers from trying to revive Gillian; and that guards may not have made their regularly scheduled rounds that day, possibly causing a delay in discovering his suicide.

The incident is at least the second documented case in recent months of disputes between medical staffers and guards over when a cell door should be opened to provide emergency medical care and assistance to an inmate.

On Sept. 7, Joseph Duran, 35, an inmate at Mule Creek State Prison in Amador County who suffered from mental illness, died hours after he was blasted in the face with pepper spray, according to an internal department review of that case. Duran had undergone a tracheotomy years before, and breathed through a hole in his throat. Agitated and coated with spray, he yanked out the tube he relied on for air, according to the review team report. Guards refused to intervene, despite repeated demands from medical staffers to allow them to enter his cell, decontaminate him and reinsert the tube, according to staff interviews contained in the internal report. Duran was found dead, alone in his cell, seven hours later.

That incident, laid out in a January story in The Bee, prompted U.S. District Judge Lawrence K. Karlton to reopen an evidentiary hearing in Sacramento federal court inquiring into the alleged use of excessive force on mentally ill inmates in California prisons.

[BIG SNIP]

The two cases come as the corrections department battles legal action on several fronts tied to medical and mental health care inside California’s 34 adult prisons. Last month, a three-judge court agreed to give California two more years to reduce its inmate population to 137.5 percent of capacity, a benchmark designed to reduce the overcrowding that the court in 2009 found is the primary reason for subconstitutional levels of medical and mental health treatment for inmates.

Revelations about Duran’s death have complicated matters for the department in a separate inquiry: the hearing before Karlton involving use of force on mentally ill inmates. Attorneys representing the state’s mentally ill inmates did not learn of the circumstances of Duran’s death until they were contacted by The Bee in January, and they have accused the state of covering up his death and the fact that pepper spray was used. The hearing on use of pepper spray and discipline against mentally ill inmates began Oct. 1 and went into November in Karlton’s court in Sacramento, during the same period that corrections officials were reviewing Duran’s death.

Corrections officials deny they were suppressing the Duran incident, but Karlton ordered a hearing on use of force reopened and has scheduled a court session partially devoted to Duran’s death for Monday afternoon.

34 Comments

  • Mr. Hellmold would do well to go and stick his head in the sand somewhere. He has no ethics and no integrity.

  • Some more information directly pulled from the full article…..

    …….”Hellmold once served as a personal assistant and driver for Baca. He owes his rise in the department in part to the retired sheriff and to another candidate, former undersheriff Paul Tanaka. They groomed and promoted him.”……

    Hhhmm…. “In part????”

    and…

    ……”Hellmold did survive one event that threatened his reputatton. In 2005, he was a lieutenant in command during one of the most notorious incidents in Sheriff’s Department history. Deputies fired 120 shots at an unarmed man following a high-speed pursuit in Compton. Bullets flew everywhere, hitting some homes. A deputy was wounded by friendly fire. Just four shots hit the suspect. Incredibly, he survived.

    An independent report cleared Hellmold of misconduct – he was several blocks away at a command post. But he’s heard the recent talk that he bore responsibility.

    “That’s campaign trickery,” the first time candidate declared.”……

    Hhhmmm…. “He was at a Command Post????” Are Command Post’s established during active pursuits???

    and……

    ……”Asked for a war story from the streets, he doesn’t talk about the time he shot an armed bank robber. He tells of taking foster kids to UCLA football games.”…..

    Hhmmm….. “I’m a crime fighter” is his primary “tag”. Why not talk about the time he “shot a bank robber”? How did that go down?

  • Yes, I want to hear about how that shooting went down too. To set the record straight Hellmold is cut out of the same mold Eric Parra is, they were GIVEN assignments to specialized units that in their wildest dreams would NEVER had been assigned to if they were not politically connected. Between the both of them they have spent about 10 minutes in a booking cage. They were GIVEN top promotional spots under Baca/Tanaka. Listen, if these are the people that remain in command of the LASD then it is more of the same. Olmstead will come in and sweep out this trash and the recovery will begin.

  • Both Hellmold’s and Rogers’ campaign are a curious study in denial. They both claim, to different degrees, that the department needs to be reformed. At the same time they refuse to acknowledge reforms needed in the one area that facilitated all the corruption – the promotional process. They can’t argue the promotional system is compromised because they were the chief beneficiaries of it.

    How can they explain their fortunes rose as the department’s reputation tanked? It doesn’t add up, and it never will in the eyes of the voter. Todd “the reformer” and Jimmy “the crime fighter” are not the credible candidates who can enact true reform for the department, and they both know it. That is all the voter will judge them by, and they both fail miserably.

    Neither of the two of you will convince those on the department you are serious because you’re not honest with yourselves or department members. Each of you has your entourage of sycophants that will amount to just another version of Baca/Tanaka, same game different names.

    I challenge each of you to convince those you propose to lead that is not the case. For starters, disavow your cheap introductory slogans, Todd you were never a reformer and still have not shown any effort, and Jimmy, crime fighter, really? From 4700 Ramona Blvd all those years? Don’t insult real crime fighters…

  • “Attorney General Kamala Harris announced her endorsement of Long Beach Police Chief Jim McDonnell in the Los Angeles Sheriff race.”

    Thats all I need to know………the choice is obvious now, Bob Olmstead!

  • Parra is a class act. I can think of a few people that did “favors” for him to get good assignments.

  • For those of you that put Eric in the same egg crate with Hellmold haven’t worked for Eric.

    He can be high maintenance and you will do many tasks at one time, but he was fair and covered your back if you screwed up without being stupid about it. He had an open door policy and would ask your opinion on a subject. It wasn’t a one sided conversation like most managers.

    I had no complaints. I never worked for Hellmold, but watching his mannerisms and body language, he isn’t Sheriff material. he is too young, not a visionary and definitely would not garner the respect of his employees.

  • Not to be outdone, along comes Paul Tanaka with his official “plan.” His intro letter talking about himself is almost as long as his plan, but a close read of this document is quite entertaining. It confirms what we’ve suspected all along – Tanaka is amateur hour personified.

    The chutzpah award of the year goes to this intro letter, which in part states: “I have watched hardworking men and women of this department suffer from a fundamental lack of leadership. After dedicating 33 years of my life to public service, I decided to run for Sheriff of Los Angeles County to give the 18,000 civilian and sworn employees a leader they can trust to guide them successfully into the future and the people of LA County a Sheriff’s Department they can trust to keep them safe while abiding by the highest possible standards of conduct.”

    Hey Paul, weren’t YOU the one responsible for providing leadership when you took over for absent Baca? Didn’t you run roughshod over every chief and A/S in your way as you played your empire building game? And you have the gall to ask people to trust YOU with abiding by highest standards of conduct? I doubt you are smoking crack, Paul, but that is some powerful stuff you’ve given to your followers! Maybe we should alert the FDA and DEA..

    The funniest part of the plan: “Restore the Undersheriff position and create an organizational structure, which sets forth a clear chain of command. It is imperative that members of the Sheriff’s Department know what their specific responsibilities are and whom they report to.” Haven’t we heard enough testimony from department members who told their immediate supervisors that they worked for YOU, Paul, and not them?

    How did that whole chain of command thingy work out for the department with you in charge, Paul?

  • LATBG- All political thinking for years past has been vitiated in the same way. People can foresee the future only when it coincides with their own wishes, and the most grossly obvious facts can be ignored when they are unwelcome. George Orwell

  • Paul is going to be a distant memory, Olmstead will give it his best, but too weak to overcome his prior jail issues. Hellmold is, well just Hellmold. Less than 1% of the vote if that.

    Mc Donnell is going to be our new boss. I look forward to it, welcome it, and hope to adopt some of the ideas and policies LAPD has grown to embrace. Unfortunately, I’m down the food chain, but his decisions will impact all of us.

    Mc Donnell will loosen some of the restrictive policies choking the deputies in the field. He will give people the benefit of the doubt and not fall to our ridiculous advisory groups that are nothing more than a hot bed of back stabbing, CCW posturing and political bullying. It’s bad enough with the special reserves who were trained at their homes, work, and then got burned by POST for BS course completions. all under the watchful eye of big top LASD management

    Welcome aboard Jim. More people than you know want you on board.

    SDR

  • It looks like we have an LAPD troll on this site folks! Not to be confused with an actual deputy, who would never surrender the leadership of his/her department to #2 in blue.

    LAPD troll, we want nothing to do with your top-heavy centralized bureaucracy and 911 system that gives people a busy message in real emergencies. We don’t want our deputies kissing off reports and calls and having them call back on a better day. We don’t want deputies standing in the field for hours waiting for the boys in blue to show up and actually handle their jurisdiction for once.

    Our work ethic is different. Your Code 7 is the real clincher, we just take our oath to mean it’s 24/7. And while your at it, looks like the real carpetbagger McDonnell is being revealed. Let’s see, OIS’s are on the rise, damaging racial profiling report just released by the Long Beach Press Telegram, LPBD cop sues for retaliation but good ol’ Jimmy says it’s not possible because they have rules against that! Doesn’t this sound familiar?

    LAPD troll, tell your boy to re-apply to be LAPD’s top dog. I’m sure he will do a whizz-bang job by LA city standards, but we don’t need a sheriff with training wheels…

  • Don’t buy into the political fat cat rhetoric bellowing out of the Hall of Administration and other institutions of redundancy. Read the excerpts below from the Press Telegram and you’ll see he doesn’t walk on water as some would like you to believe.

    Police Chief Jim McDonnell, who is running for Los Angeles County sheriff, referred questions to Deputy Chief David Hendricks, who stressed that officers do not consider ethnicity when making arrests and that no particular community is being targeted.

    The city has seen higher violent crime rates in the downtown and central areas as well as North Long Beach, which also happens to be where most of the city’s Latino and black population live.

    “In those areas, we also have a higher number of Hispanic and African-American victims of crime,” Hendricks said.

    The Police Department at times have an uneasy relationship with the black community, the arrest numbers are tough to accept.

    Last year, there was a high number of officer-involved shootings in the city and one in particular angered the black community: the shooting death of 19-year-old Tyler Damon Woods in November. The black Rialto man was unarmed when he was shot and killed on the roof of an apartment building. Police said Woods had a warrant out for his arrest, which described him as armed and dangerous.

    “Maybe we have to have some sort of review,” said Schipske, about the high arrest rate for black youths. “We need to know what’s driving these numbers.”

  • I agree with many of the negative points brought up about several of the candidates.

    But I take exception to the bashing of Todd for the promotion of Bob.

    Todd was passed over how many times for promotion because he wasn’t in the car?

    Todd, to this day, pushes a hoop once a month and takes bad guys to jail.

    He took over Tanaka’s spot and blew up the supervisors of the background unit that were more worried about warm bodies than helping the department grow with qualified deputies.

    We’re starting to see backfill OT money being found to adequately staff patrol. People that have been permanently “loaned” to special units from patrol are now getting placed on the books at those assignments so they free up patrol slots.

    A ton has changed for the better since Todd got promoted. To lump him in with Moonbeam, Tanaka, and Hellmold is grossly unfair and inaccurate… and unfortunately Olmsted’s got a massive campaign going to lump Rogers in with the rest of them because Olmsted knows his best shot is in a run off with McDonnell… and Rogers is probably Olmsted’s only competition for a run off spot against McDonnell.

  • The Elephant In The Room:

    It is clear that most of the commenters on this blog are not Paul Tanaka fans, I get it. However, you should be aware that Paul Tanaka is not going away and WILL be one of two candidates left standing come early June. The other candidates do not have a chance or the name recognition. Also, be aware that Paul Tanaka has a very large team of passionate people (and money) who will undoubtedly bring him to the June run-off.

    Please save this entry and re-post the day after the Primary. It’s going to happen.

  • #14, You are quite correct, Todd Rogers has a very fine history & is a solid manager & leader. After the “finessing” of Tanaka & the promotion of Rogers there was a great sense of relief. Rogers took over many of the responsibilities controlled by Tanaka with the result that the Chief’s felt included & listened to. A huge change to be sure.
    To those who are bent on bashing the various candidates, try extolling the virtues & strengths of the person you support.
    Much as Sherman Block’s failed to hand off & Lee Baca was the outcome, Baca’s lack of
    management & ethics has taken away the likelihood of any LASD candidate success. The political establishment is fully behind Chief McDonnell & given the intransigence of Baca & scope of problems warranted. It is also fully understandable that there is general unease with an outsider that comes from an agency that is a competitor in many respects.
    In my opinion all the candidates warrant respect & focus. The debates are beginning and hopefully will give us a clear view of who deserves our support. For Chief McDonnell I will be looking for his understanding of the differences in tone & complexity between LAPD & LASD. With Commander Olmsted, has his organizational experience adequately prepared him for the top spot? With Tanaka, I’m waiting for the “Breaking News” saying he’s been taken into custody by the FBI. With the others I’m looking for them to shape the debate in constructive interest of the LASD staff.

  • I guess I am beyond frustrated at this point. I have been with the LASD for my entire adult life… And that is a lot of years. Reading these posts over the last year or so used to bring a sense that change was coming. Now when I read what people have to say, I just feel a sense of emptiness. We have resorted to ganging up on each other, talking smack about just about everyone, attacking people for their viewpoint, and pretty much acting like a bunch of jerks. People in the LASD aren’t just “cops” or “law enforcement”…. We are the best damned law enforcement agency on the planet. We stand above the rest, in spite of all the drama. All of the issues will be corrected, but it has taken so agonizingly long that we seem to have lost sight of the fact that we are all brothers and sisters. The idiots who put us in this position are either gone or going…. We will get a new sheriff…. We will recover and move one. The angry, childish, outrageous, negative, mean-spirited, demeaning chatter needs to end. I know all of the players, having worked a great many assignments over the years. While I love some of them and hate some of them, there is no doubt in my mind that if called upon to do so, I would risk my life to save theirs… That’s what we do. We’re cops. We like to talk about how good we are; it’s time our actions lived up to the rhetoric.

  • #12, No, I’m not an LAPD troll, but wear a six point on my left chest.

    You call LAPD a bunch of kiss offs and don’t respond. That tells me you’ve never worked south central stations.

    For example, “11B requesting assistance 92nd and grape, deputies taking rounds”. Firestone units…….. per the watch commander 11F and 12B only roll code three. Are you kidding me? Let’s pull the LAPD tapes from Southeast Division. “Southeast Units, officer needs help, shots fired 92nd and Grape. Update SO Unit advising shots fired from the N/E corner, Units respond E/B 92nd Street only”.

    How many LAPD units? Let’s see about 10 from Southeast which went to a Tac alert per the W/C, then Newton came down and Southwest Division. Lynwood Station? 2 units cuz, they were down calls and the nox was too busy to cover.

    So, I’ve lived the LAPD meltdown, they will be there for you, just like McDonnell. Will the other candidates?

  • Get a grip, no one disputes the fundamentals of LASD, but you act like everyone walks on water. Keep one thing in mind. Has an aide, driver or anyone close to the top ever blown a written exam? Everyone knows how things work. So that said, you would lay your life down for any of them, will they do the same for you?

    They took an oath and somewhere, they strayed either by their environment or by their upbringing that was in control until allowed to manifest itself as a deputy. You decide whether that’s right or wrong. Every day we see people in command that were drivers for the sheriff or aides. will you look at them in the same way as you do a deputy working a tom car in Norwalk? I hope not

  • #21… Here we go, just like I said. Re-read my post. I am not naïve. I worked FPK and LNX along with a few others. I was and am simply saying that we need to focus on the future. And yes, I would risk my life to save someone… Even if I hate their guts. Isn’t that what honor and integrity are all about? Save me the Norwalk T car crap. Right is right, no matter who is involved. If the folks you’re annoyed with got unfairly promoted, I guess that’s the way it happened. We learn from it and move on. As far as I know, only one individual has ever walked on water, and it wasn’t you or me.

  • @stuff, you are spot on about Parra, and anybody that has worked for him either fell under his jedi mind tricks, or was quickly cast aside. Just ask his old friend Piete. He needs to seriously look in the mirror, and search for true leadership because he has none.

  • Hey really. Not sure if you want to use Piete as an example. isn’t that the same guy who made the LA Times because he had racial ringtones going off during a meeting?

    If Parra kicked anyone to the curb it’s because they deserved it. I think you might have answered your own questions. Eric didn’t have time for shenanigans. If mediocre staff got their feelings hurt, well, move on or retire. this job isn’t about being touchy feely. It’s serious, has everlasting consequences and needs leadership.

    So since you mentioned someone’s name as a victim, you might want to check with him and see what the real story is.

    Money tells me it ain’t a one sided kick down.

  • Skyfalling and Yup, sorry to burst your collective bubbles, but tanaka and Rogers don’t have enough distance between themselves and Baca to win in November against a well-financed outsider with better name recognition. Olmsted is the only candidate with a good chance of winning a runoff, assuming the unions get their act together and offer a counterbalance to the political establishment. It’s that simple.

    Regarding Rogers, he blew it the moment he sold his soul for those three stars. He should have challenged the corrupt regime when he had the chance, but he lacked the huevos to do it. His conduct in FOR II was all about rubber stamping Tanaka’s decisions and he never bothered pushing back to defend the emperors victims for fear it would harm his future promotions. As the assistant sheriff he oversaw the sergeant test cheating scandal and what did he do? Rubber stamped that sucker as well. Todd may be a nice man, but he was too absorbed in his own success to bother with standing up and do the right thing – not sheriff material. Even as we speak he is gaging whether or not to cut a deal with a front runner for one more star.

    In the final analysis it will boil down to whether or not department members want to ensure Mcdonnells election by splitting the opposition or unite behind the one candidate who can win it all – Bob Olmsted.

  • After reviewing voting patterns from previous Sheriff’s races and ethnic voting patterns in Los Angeles County, here are my predictions.

    Vince Lou LAPD Detective. No name recognition. Little money, no experience in a field crowded with white guys. A previous run by Paul Jernigen results in just under 5 percent running against Baca. Lou with end up with 3%.

    Jim Hellmold LASD A/S. No name recognition, no political experience, some support from the African American Community with Baca’s support. Baca’s endorsement like or not is still worth something! Has the rank and looks good. That counts. However he is in a crowded field and will fall far short. Hellmold 10%.

    Bob Olmstead Ret Commander LASD. Minimal name recognition. White guy in a field crowded with white guys. Lost his most voter motivating issue when Baca dropped out. Most of his support seems to be retired LASD Executives. Presents well has some money but will come up short. Olmstead 10%.

    Paul Tanaka Ret U/S LASD. Good name recognition however much is bad but people know him. Elected official with fiscally responsible record in Gardena. He has a political base. He has money, some impressive endorsements and a great online presence. Asians do not necessarily vote as a block and Paul killed an unarmed Korean boy some years ago. That might impact the Korean vote! Pay for play, jail abuse, Federal indictments will leave Paul reaching.. Tanaka 13%.

    Patrick Gomez Ret Lt. LASD. You probably thought I forgot him. Only Hispanic in the Race. They will vote in a block. Previous runs against Baca an establish Hispanic incumbent, earn 10 and 12 percent. This occurred with little money or name recognition. Hispanics represent a third of the voters in LA County. Without a motivating issue they will vote for familiar name. Gomez 17%.

    Todd Rogers LASD A/S. Has the experience and rank. Elected official with a solid political base in Lakewood. Deep roots in Carson where he was a Captain for five years, I think? Will have regional support around Lakewood because of activities with the local coalition of governments. Presents well, looks good, has Baca’s support and the support of many local officials. Baca’s support is still a positive for now. Has very few negatives that will concern voters. Seems to be reasonably funded. Rogers makes the run off at 19%.

    Jim McDonnell Chief Long Beach PD, former A/Chief LAPD. No political experience, biggest name outsider which maybe a positive. Big name political support and endorsements. No big negatives that will concern voters, yet. City of LA has 3.8 million residents. Many will still remember Bratton’s number two! Almost 500k residents in Long Beach. Good base in Long Beach. He will be well funded. Clear front runner. McDonnell 28%.

    Game changers: African Amercans are motivated to vote as a block, currently I see no galvanizing issue. Their vote is worth 8 or 9%. Federal indictments of Baca or Tanaka. This will help some but hurt others. Finally most importantly money! More money means more votes.

    Critics please focus on what motivates voters not who worked Reg II, wears Tan and Green or smokes cigars.

  • If you want money and the political machine to run LASD, nothing will change, we will have the same kind of mess we just got rid of. Who has a plan in writing, which one is best for the future for LASD and not bring baggage with them or in someone pocket or owing favors. Think before you speak or Vote you will have to live with along time.

  • LATBG- Speaking of huevos, you’ve got gigantic ones for putting your money on Bob Olmstead. But what the heck? Occasionally 200-1 longshots come in at Santa Anita. Bigger the risk, bigger the reward I suppose.

  • Handicapper, the minute you said Baca’s support is still a positive for now demonstrates you don’t understand the dynamics of this race very well. Baca is the proverbial tar baby, and the closer the candidate is to him the worse off he will be.

    Not a single candidate is going to blow away the field with the money needed for the media buy required to press any advantage they may have. Independent campaign expenditures can make a difference, but not a guarantee. Just look at the LAUSD race last year as an example.

    The two runoff candidates will be the ones who can make the best argument for enacting credible reform, and McDonnell and Olmsted still lead the crowd. This primary you will see voters do something they haven’t done in a while, which is educate themselves on the candidate’s positions.

  • Some of the points about Todd come into question. We are still hiring candidates that have been rejected by other agencies for good reasons. What about the issue with the Sgt. exam?   If the test was compromised, it should have been tossed. Look at the latest civil service agenda for next week under new business. We have 12 deputies that committed  some serious criminal  acts that would have led to a firing in any other law enforcement agency.  Not LASD. We just give them a 30 day suspensions. Leadership not holding personnel to a high standard has caused the erosion of our organization.  Todd and others   continue to fail the good employees that  do serve the public with  respect and integrity. 

    http://civilservice.lacounty.gov/Portals/CSC/pdf/agenda26.pdf

  • 12 cases in one hearing is an unusually large number. Does anyone know if they are related or individual cases? Something seems fishy here…

Leave a Comment