LOS ANGELES JAIL REPLACEMENT PROPOSAL RELEASED, AND IS EVEN MORE PRICEY THAN THE LAST TWO BIDS
On Wednesday, Vanir Construction Management Inc. released a report detailing five options for replacing the aging Men’s Central Jail, as requested by the Board of Supervisors. The proposed options range in price from $1.74 billion and $2.32 billion over a ten year period.
This isn’t the first jail construction bid presented to the county. Last July, the jail-replacement proposals ranged in price from $1.3 billion to $1.6 billion.
A few months before that, in March of 2013, LA County CEO Bill Fujioka and Sheriff Lee Baca proposed a $933 million jail building project.
We presume there’s a good reason for the repeatedly escalated price, and we hope that will be a topic of discussion by the Board of Supervisors.
The LA Times’ Abbey Sewell has the latest on the construction proposals. Here’s a clip:
The county supervisors, concerned about deteriorating facilities and poor living conditions for inmates with mental health issues, want to tear down the aging Men’s Central Jail in downtown Los Angeles and replace it. The new facility would be primarily focused on housing inmates with physical and mental health needs and substance abuse issues.
Officials are also contemplating creating a new 1,600-bed women’s jail at the now-vacant Mira Loma Detention Center in Lancaster, to replace the overcrowded women’s jail in Lynwood.
The plan is not expected to increase the county’s total number of available jail beds, but officials said it would help the county comply with federal mandates on the treatment of mentally ill inmates, and would allow women — who are typically lower risk than male inmates — to be housed in a less restrictive environment with more options for job training and other programs.
The report by Vanir Construction Management laid out five options, all of which involve replacing the Men’s Central Jail. The new facility would hold between 4,860 and 5,860 inmates, depending on the option chosen, with the bulk of the beds set aside for inmates needing medical, mental health and substance abuse treatment, and a smaller number of beds for high-security inmates. Four of the five options also include a new women’s jail.
The construction is projected to cost between $1.74 billion and $2.32 billion over the next 10 years, and after that would add $162 million to $300 million a year to the county’s jail operating costs.
LOS ANGELES DEPUTIES PLANT GUNS IN MARIJUANA CLINIC, FALSELY ARREST TWO MEN
In an alarming story, two former LA County deputies, Julio Martinez and Anthony Paez, are accused of planting two guns in a marijuana dispensary in order to arrest two men. Over a year later, an internal investigation found inconsistencies between the deputies’ report and the dispensary’s surveillance tape.
The ex-deputies face more than seven years each behind bars, if convicted.
ABC7’s Hanna Chu has the story. Here’s a clip:
Julio Cesar Martinez, 39, and Anthony Manuel Paez, 32, were charged on Wednesday with one felony count of conspiracy to obstruct justice and peace officer altering evidence, the L.A. County District Attorney’s Office announced. Martinez was also charged with two counts of perjury and one count of filing a false report.
Prosecutors say the deputies wrote a report saying they “witnessed a narcotics transaction and observed one suspect with a firearm” while they were on patrol in the area of West 84th Place on Aug. 24, 2011.
Martinez apparently followed one suspect inside a pot clinic, where he allegedly found a firearm near a trash bin and another next to ecstasy pills. One man was taken into custody for possession of an unregistered firearm, while another man was arrested for possession of a controlled substance while armed with a firearm.
Charges had been filed against the two men falsely arrested. The case against one of the men was later dismissed, however the other suspect had pled before the corruption was discovered. The district attorney’s office said it was in the process of notifying the man’s defense attorney.
An investigation into the incident about a year later found that the deputies’ report was inconsistent with a video recording from the pot clinic. According to a criminal complaint, Martinez kicked at a wall outlet to shut off electricity inside the room during the incident, while Paez “opened a drawer and retrieved a handgun and placed it on a chair.”
Charges were dropped against one of the two men falsely arrested, but the other was sentenced to a year in jail (according to the LA Times’ Kate Mather).
DCFS DIRECTOR RESPONDS TO BLUE RIBBON COMMISSION’S FINAL REPORT
On Wednesday’s Air Talk, host Larry Mantle talks with Philip Browning, Director of the Department of Children and Family Services about the Blue Ribbon Commission’s final report.
Browning has some interesting things to say about the commission’s recommendations, so take a listen.
Here is a clip from the episode’s summary:
The department’s director, Philip Browning, says they have an oversight body already – the Board of Supervisors. He says many of the ideas have been instituted already – “about 96% have been partially or fully implemented.”
He goes on to say new social-worker training incorporates home-call simulations and promotes critical thinking and common sense. Was the Blue Ribbon Commission on Child Protection more of the same – or critical to overhaul DCFS? What will the Board of Supervisors decide?
DOJ ANNOUNCES NEW CLEMENCY CRITERIA
On Monday, US Attorney General Eric Holder announced a new initiative by the Department of Justice to open up the possibility of clemency to low-level drug offenders sentenced under outdated federal guidelines.
On Wednesday, Deputy Attorney General James Cole announced the new, broader criteria for clemency applications.
Here’s a clip from the Justice Dept. website:
Under the new initiative, the department will prioritize clemency applications from inmates who meet all of the following factors:
They are currently serving a federal sentence in prison and, by operation of law, likely would have received a substantially lower sentence if convicted of the same offense(s) today;
They are non-violent, low-level offenders without significant ties to large scale criminal organizations, gangs or cartels;
They have served at least 10 years of their prison sentence;
They do not have a significant criminal history;
They have demonstrated good conduct in prison; and
They have no history of violence prior to or during their current term of imprisonment.
“For our criminal justice system to be effective, it needs to not only be fair; but it also must be perceived as being fair,” said Deputy Attorney General Cole. “Older, stringent punishments that are out of line with sentences imposed under today’s laws erode people’s confidence in our criminal justice system, and I am confident that this initiative will go far to promote the most fundamental of American ideals – equal justice under law.”
The LASD should implement a brown mourning stripe to wear on their badges every time one of their own dishonors the department with criminal malfeasance like the evidence planting these deputies are accused of. The concrete thinkers in the department need a tangible reminder that individual misconduct tarnishes the image of the entire department. The members of LASD may think of themselves as good people but they have earned a bad public image thanks to the repeated misconduct. Closing the gap between their self image and how the public sees them is an important step to fixing what’s wrong with the department.
All accused are innocent until proven guilty, but this sounds like “hard working” deputies who were just “working the gray.” Tanaka’s lasting legacy is going to take time to flush out.
These deputies were doing as they were trained. Someone showed them this was condoned. “This is how we do it in the ghetto bro”. This cycle is going to take some time and effort to break.
Mr Tanaka never allowed or encouraged illegal or unethical behavior. I normally just read this funny paper, however Mr Uninteresting Party’s continual misstating of the facts of what Mr Tanaka stated and testified too compelled me to jump into this sewer of haters. Most experienced LEO understand what Mr Tanaka said about the “Grey Area” and it wasn’t anything illegal. You know it too but the truth doesn’t fit your bias agenda or your hatred for Mr Tanaka. We County citizens and ethical police officers see through your BS.
How much is Dick $hinee going to earn for these two?. Should be a legal plan for those who don’t do stupid things,to get reimbursement of some sorts, since most knuckle heads drain Alads legal plan featuring “Tricky Dick” $hinee and his sole private practice. You can’t blame the former “OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY” officers for this one. Were they taught this by their T.O.’s during training? This is one of many reasons, why NO ONE wants any of the Sheriff candidates other than Olmsted to lead the Sheriff’s Department. What an embarrassing scene!
Let Your Rants Go, most experienced cops know that Tanaka is full of himself, obsessed with power, and doesn’t give a rat’s ass about the organization. Having heard his famous grey speech in person, I know exactly what he meant, and these two ex-deputies were practicing it.
How did that work out for them?
Arguing over the “grey” is not practical. There are two camps. Those of us who believe it meant to know the law, and apply it to the letter. Use the law to get the bad guy.
It never meant to do 10-30 crap, lie on reports, or do anything illegal, once you do that you “cross the line” and become the crook.
Then there are those that think it meant to “cross the line, since you had a badge it was ok.”
Well it wasn’t meant that way, and if it was I and many many other did not see it as such.
No I am not an R2 gunslinger, No I do not support Mr. T., with the exception he did like people to work. Some took it to mean they could do other things and be rewarded, sadly to others it seemed they were. But to reiterate, the “grey” is not “illegal” or 10-30.”
@ #7 here is a definition I found of the gray area: “an undefined situation or subject that does not seem to conform to known categories or rules; an intermediate area or topic that is not clearly defined”, so the problem I have with his speech is that you are telling people to work hard “push the envelope,” but then when they do he leaves them hanging. Clearly all he wanted was to be the head of the biggest, baddest law enforcement agency in the country with no dirt on his hands. Sounds a little like a gangster mentality to me.
We were already the best. We lost our way when people like him started taking care of those who would kiss their butts. If you take away a persons “need” to perform at a high standard, they will most likely cut corners(bad gray area)! If you “demand” they follow the rules and reward them for being smarter and performing well, despite their unwillingness to kiss butt, they will (good gray area)!
Well said