The Feds have been telling California over and over to fix it’s prison healthcare system…or else, and the governor and state lawmakers have done just about nothing.
How bad has it been? In 2002, an outraged Judge Thelton Henderson said that conditions in the California Department of Corrections healthcare system were so bad that they violated the 8th Amendment to the Constitution prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment. In 2005 he wrote that things had worsened to the point that one inmate “needlessly dies every six to seven days due to constitutional deficiencies in the CDCR’s medical delivery system.” (I ranted in detail about the issue here last September.)
So guess what? Turns out the Feds weren’t kidding. Federal receiver, J. Clark Kelso has now ordered California to cough up seven billion dollars to pay for seven new facilities for chronically sick or mentally ill inmates.
Seven billion for new prisons in a year when the state has a projected budget shortfall of 16.7 billion—which has already caused the governor to whack ten percent out of schools and to threaten close one out of every five state parks if money isn’t found to keep them open.
Here’s the LA Times’ much-needed editorial on the subject. (Not that it’ll do any good.)
California’s leaders are faced with the job of under-funding the state’s already struggling schools and cutting services to the poor because of a chronic budget shortfall, exacerbated by the weak economy. But on the bright side, we stand to get a whole bunch of gleaming new prison buildings.
The federal receiver in charge of the state’s prison healthcare system has requested $7 billion to pay for seven new facilities for chronically sick or mentally ill inmates. The Legislature will have little choice but to go along because the receiver, J. Clark Kelso, is backed by the power of the federal bench, which can order the state to spend the money. This comes at a time when the shortfall has been projected at up to $16.5 billion, though it has since been reduced through borrowing and budget cuts.
Lawmakers are crying foul about the added burden on the budget, even though they have no one but themselves to blame. A prison crisis that combines overcrowding, a negligent healthcare program and a crumbling juvenile justice system has been worseningfor three decades, during which time dozens of studies have chronicled the problems and pointed the way to solving them. The reports are now gathering dust on a shelf somewhere, ignored by lawmakers. Indeed, legislators and the electorate have decisively made matters worse by approving get-tough-on-crime initiatives that further cram prisons and do nothing to address conditions inside.One of the latest studies, released in January 2007 by the independent state oversight agency known as the Little Hoover Commission, is a model of the form. It practically shrieked at lawmakers to implement the needed reforms, which include creating an independent sentencing commission that could lengthen terms for the most dangerous criminals while creating community-based options for nonviolent offenders, reinventing the state’s disastrously inefficient parole system and expanding prison-based drug rehabilitation and job-training programs.
A year later, the Legislature has acted on none of those recommendations. Its sole accomplishment on corrections was to approve $7.9 billion in new prison and jail construction. Kelso’s order demonstrates the inadequacy of this strategy: His call for $7 billion in bonds comes on top of what the Legislature has approved, and all this construction still may not satisfy a separate three-judge panel that is considering the overcrowding crisis and could order further spending. We simply cannot build our way out of this problem, especially because all these new facilities will add crushing operational expenses to future state budgets.
The only solution is to cut the prison population by implementing reforms such as those suggested by the Little Hoover Commission. And lawmakers might want to get on with it before they get hit with another whopping bill from the federal justice system. Delay and inaction have gotten us to this point; only the courage to act on these proposals will get us out.
And what kept the lawmakers from solving the problem? Pure politics. Thanks a lot. (Oh, yeah, and the dead guys’ families thank you too.)
This isn’t a recent problem, so the lawmakers who didn’t solve problems go over decades, which shows that government is the problem no matter who is in charge. So, what will be the proposed solution…tax more.
“legislators and the electorate have decisively made matters worse by approving get-tough-on-crime initiatives that further cram prisons and do nothing to address conditions inside.”
I could free up lots of bed space, we need a quick death penalty for the worst of the worst prisoners. There are mexican mafia members who are still ordering executions on the streets and giving orders to their soldiers on the streets, from their prison cells. We have wasted billions on hardcore sociopaths, who are still a menace to society from inside prison. Many A.B., EME and BGF prison gang members should have already been put to sleep.
We also waste money and space on killers like Charles Manson, Richard Allen Davis, Tookie Willams. I understand Tookie Willaims is now “reformed†because he writes some nice poetry. I’m waiting to read some nice rhymes by Charles Manson to see if he now a nice guy.
Want to have money for helping young kids with gang intervention programs, and save lots of lives on the streets?
Free the pot heads and execute the gang leaders, which will save money and remove a few of the bad influences from the at risk youth. It’s a simple solution.
What’s the source of the $7.9 billion construction costs for new prison facilities? That amount seems ridiculous if you consider the cost per prisoner.
Nunez blasts Homeland Security over workplace immigration raids
http://www.dailynews.com/ci_8966543
I guess Nunez wants more of this.
http://www.dailynews.com/ci_8965468
http://www.myspace.com/varriosanfer
District Attorney Steve Cooley and City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo are seeking an injunction that would place severe limits on the gang’s estimated 900 members to meet in public, intimidate witnesses and sell or possess drugs, weapons or graffiti tools.
Citing cases of intimidation of young people, the random shooting of a man baby-sitting his 1-year-old nephew and the beating of people walking on the street, officials said the San Fers have acted as if they are above the law.
“For too long, the San Fer gang has used intimidation, violence and fear to hold this community in the San Fernando Valley hostage to its insidious activities,” Delgadillo said.
Councilman Richard Alarcó n, whose district includes the affected area, embraced the news, saying, “We are targeting criminal gang activity wherever it occurs.”
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Alarcon another num-nuts councilman
I have a feeling the subject is about to get changed…
“The Feds have been telling California over and over to fix it’s prison healthcare….”
Tsk tsk. This should read: “The Feds have been telling California over and over to fix its prison healthcare….”