Prison Prison Policy

Prisons and Torching Money

burning-money


Playing catch up from the three day weekend,
here are three pieces about the ongoing prison mess—and the money it is costing us:


THE SAC BEE DOES THE MATH: THE PRISON BUDGET INACTION COSTS TAXPAYERS $3.3 MILLION A DAY.

It’s about time that some media outlet made it really, really clear what this budget impass is costing us in real money. Below is the bottom line on the Bee’s piece. But it is worth reading the whole thing.

The fiscal crunch grows by $3.3 million per day because the state budget anticipated that a deal on how to cut $1.2 billion from prisons would be struck in July, not mired in politics for months.


WHILE THE MONEY DRAINS OUT, WILL CALIFORNIA HAVE TO WAIT FOR THE SUPREMES?

Monday, the San Jose Mercury News had this report about the various court battles shaping up around many of these same prison issues:

California officials Friday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to block a lower court order that forces the state to quickly devise a plan to shed more than 40,000 inmates from its overcrowded prisons.

In a 46-page petition to Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, who handles emergency appeals from the Western states, California Attorney General Jerry Brown asked for an immediate stay of a three-judge panel’s Aug. 4 order requiring the state to submit its prisoner release plan within 45 days.


Judges on the federal court panel Thursday
rejected the state’s bid for a stay, saying they’ve been “more than patient with the state and its officials” in the years-long legal battle over conditions inside California’s prison system.

But California officials say the court has put the state
in an impossible spot by requiring it to come up with a plan to reduce the prison population by one-fourth by Sept. 18.

“Every day that the three-judge court’s order hangs over California, it places enormous strains on the state’s existing resources and creates intolerable anxiety for both officials and residents of the nation’s most populous state,” state lawyers wrote to Kennedy.

State officials are asking Kennedy to put the order on hold
while they appeal the entire ruling to the Supreme Court in the coming month.

Given that the state is hemorrhaging money daily, Doug Berman over at Sentencing, Law and Policy wants to know if the Supremes will be willing to hurry:

In other words, everyone says for a variety of reasons that time is of the essence in these matters. Thus, it would seem important for Justice Kennedy and/or the entire Supreme Court to move quickly to rule in some manner concerning this California prison litigation. And yet SCOTUS is not an institution known for moving very fast on others’ timelines. Thus, I will be intrigued to see not only how, but when, SCOTUS responds to California’s emergency filing.


THE RECESSION BEHIND BARS

An Op Ed in the NY Times by an inmate and writer named Kenneth Hartman, who is doing life in the California state prison at Lancaster, talks about the affect of the recession on life inside the state’s 33 lock-ups.

Here are some clips.

The first inkling of financial difficulties in here surfaced in the chow hall. All of a sudden prison officials became concerned about our overeating. In the last couple of years, our brown plastic trays have started to look and feel a lot emptier. Even the old staples, beans and rice, shrank into bite-sized portions. Luxury items like frosted cake and meat cut from the carcass of a once-living thing vanished. The new menus, chock full of potatoes and meat substitutes, seem right out of a Spartan’s cookbook.

[SNIP]

The last time I received a visit from my family, in early July, the air-conditioning in the visiting room had been broken for more than a month. This matters because my prison is in the high desert north of Los Angeles. Temperatures here in the summer commonly rise above 100 dusty, windy degrees. Pack 150 people into an airless room and you’ve got the makings for human meltdown. Two industrial-sized fans only made a hot situation noisy, too.

The next day I asked one of the administrators what could be done to get the air-conditioning fixed, and he told me an amazing story. The free-world contractor who services the prison’s air-conditioning systems had refused to come out to replace the part that was broken, because the state owed the company tens of thousands of dollars in back fees and could pay only in i.o.u.’s. There would be no cool air until the state’s budget negotiations were concluded.

12 Comments

  • Hey, it’s not football, but this is pretty cool: Brewers’ triple play.

    On to the post, how much does it save the state by not releasing the tens of thousands of prisoners of whom many would go out and commit more crimes and kill? It may be a wiser decision to keep them locked up to protect society.

    The free-world contractor who services the prison’s air-conditioning systems had refused to come out to replace the part that was broken, because the state owed the company tens of thousands of dollars in back fees and could pay only in i.o.u.’s.

    It sounds as if this “free world” private company knows how to run a business better than the “government world.” If this contractor were part of the government, activist judges would order him to work for free. Then he could issue IOU’s to his suppliers and to feed his family. Right?

    BTW, I see that Obama has now put in place a plan to where the IRS can issue tax refunds with U.S. IOU’s. It’s being pushed as elective, but it’s only an incremental step until it’s forced, just like in California. You lead the nation! So, we see what we can expect.

  • Obama’s IOU’s would actually be in the form of savings bonds, and would be optional. Woody, have you ever in your life stated any political view without lying? If you have, just link to it. We’ll put it on display like the 3 legged Cheetah. A rare specimen.

  • Our prison system is a mess because the prisons are practically filled with people who’ve never harmed, or stolen from, other people. Imprisoning people for participating in recreational activities that pose no harm to any person(s), or for having an addiction, is going to come with a hefty price tag that no state could afford, under any circumstances. The prison system has bankrupt this state.

  • “It’s being pushed as elective” is code for it being 100% elective. There is a zero percent chance Woody would oppose this program if it were proposed by a Republican. I swear Woody would quit breathing if thought it would hurt the Democrats. I mean really. He’s angry about a program that allows people to get their refunds in US Savings bonds – sometimes referred to as the safest investment in the world. And for some reason, instead of calling them US savings bonds he describes them as an “IOU from Obama.” It’s like he’s allergic to honesty.

  • Mavis, the Chinese are moving away from U.S. IOU’s, as they see them as less safe than in the past and are complaining about Obama turning on the printing presses to pay the debt back with inflated dollars. Trust me, if Obama says that he’s doing anything for average Americans, he’s doing it for himself.

    To make financial conditions worse, Celeste burned hundred dollar bills just for the picture on this post.

  • Woody Says:
    September 8th, 2009 at 2:09 pm

    “if Obama says that he’s doing anything for average Americans, he’s doing it for himself.”

    …..

    Coming from someone who when making any political point whatsoever, stretches the truth to suit their agenda. Savings Bonds becomes “IOUs”. Ha ha ha!! You’re a hate filled recluse and a pathological liar disguised as a patriotic citizen.

  • Sisco, anyone who knows anything about American history, especially FDR, can see Obama for the phony, liar, and opportunist that he is. I don’t hate Obama. I fear how he is going to ruin this country forever.

  • Woody, I know about history, especially FDR, and I don’t see Obama as a phony, liar, and opportunist (at least not more so than any other president in recent memory). And I don’t think he’s going to ruin the country forever. Sorry. Just don’t share your view. And your far fetched arguments don’t convince me otherwise. Don’t know what to tell you.

  • Woody, we wouldn’t be worrying about the Chinese having a say about our economic policy if Reagan and the Bushes hadn’t started driving the debt back up with crackpot tax-cuts. I’m confident Obama will reverse the Republican recored of promoting reliance on debt, keep cleaning up the disastrous messes left by Bush and get us back on the path of long-term growth and stability. GOPers ALWAYS make our fiscal problems worse. That’s a fact of history for the last thirty years. If McCain had been elected we’d be looking at an even longer, deeper recession. The guy was an economic illiterate being counseled by cranks and scoundrels like Phil Gramm, Don Luskin, Kevin Hassett, Arthur Laffer, Nancy Pfotenhaur and Carly Fiorina. I can guarantee you the country would be in the toilet if we were listening to that crew…

  • I like this thread because once again Woody has already proven himself – in just four of his serial posts – that he’s a complete idiot, trolling and raving at his usual levels of lunacy.

    But he’s gotten attention for himself – which appears to be his main masturbatory wont. So maybe even when he just looks butt-stupid and blabbers nonsense he thinks he “wins.” But he’s so compulsive with the recycled, retreaded, retarded bullshit that it’s almost impossible to just ignore.

Leave a Comment