Comments on: Supremes Take on Gitmo Prisoner Case

By: Randy Paul

Randy Paul — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 02:51:35 +0000

As for the Uighurs, many were terrorists by any definition of the word, and had attended terrorist training camps.

Gee I didn’t know that had been determined? Where? In what jurisdiction?

By: John Moore

John Moore — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:49:57 +0000

suki, that’s just total nonsense.

As for the Uighurs, many were terrorists by any definition of the word, and had attended terrorist training camps. That they were planning on terrorizing a repressive, evil regime (China) doesn’t change that fact.

Even so, the US tried to get rid of them as early as 2003, but nobody would take them.

By: Rob Grocholski

Rob Grocholski — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:41:04 +0000

“Go massive–sweep it all up, things related and not.”

Sec. of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, speaking to his aides on September 11, 2001 after the Pentagon was attacked

By: suki

suki — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 04:16:29 +0000

Wow, this is a tough one where no one truly has a solution. Without a trial, it’s hard to figure out what to do with these prisoners.

All I know is, thanks Bush administration for herding all the terrorist or possible terrorist into one area, which all media sources reports is a big Al Qaeda recruiting area (finally the left and right agree on something). If the prisoner was held without just case, if they didn’t already hate the USA, now they do. If they weren’t Al Qaeda, now they are.

Thanks Bush administration, thanks for nothing!!! I feel so much less safe now.