Board of Supervisors City Government LA City Council

The Eviction: Was Bernard Parks Playing Politics With City Rentals?

bernard-parks-september.jpg

As we remain glued to the dual drama of the bailout and the election (and the debate-or-no-debate cliffhanger that is John McCain’s latest Hail Mary ball toss), let’s take a break to look at an elections-related drama closer to home.

***********************************************************************************************************

This week some are questioning whether or not Councilman Bernard Parks
used his office to play politics with the city’s rental policy.

Here’s the deal: SCOPE, a well-regarded South LA-located nonprofit, has been renting the same building for nearly ten years. Like another 100 or more nonprofits in the city (107, to be exact), SCOPE has something of a sweetheart rental deal. They are allowed to occupy a building— a former firehouse located at Florence Avenue near Western—and they pay only $1-a-year in rent. SCOPE originally made the rental deal back in 1998 with then-city council member Mark Ridley-Thomas.

Now that same council seat is occupied by Bernard Parks who is facing a close runoff race for the County Supervisor position being vacated by Yvonne Burke. His opponent in the runoff is, of course, Mark Ridley-Thomas.

(As the story continues keep that last point in mind.)

Anway….after years of happy renting, SCOPE president and founder Anthony Thigpenn and Executive Director Erika Smith were surprised and alarmed when, on September 3, they received an eviction notice stating that SCOPE must vacate the building in 60 days. No warning. No explanation. No hint of what had triggered the eviction. The notice was sent by the city’s Department of General Services.

The SCOPE folks called General Services right away to find out what was up. And were told that Councilman Bernard Parks had requested the eviction because he thought the property could be put to better use for the city and was going to be sold. “We were also told he didn’t know what SCOPE does,” said Thigpenn.

This last seemed somewhat hard to believe. As far as South LA nonprofits go, SCOPE is very well known. They have run several job training programs in the district that Parks oversees, each with budgets in excess of a million dollars.. The programs have been funded by groups as diverse as the L.A. Work Force Investment Board and Dreamworks. Most recently SCOPE has been heading up a newly hot multi-agency project called the Los Angeles Apollo Alliance that is creating green jobs for residents in low income LA neighborhoods.

In other words, SCOPE is not exactly low profile.

So if Parks really was unfamiliar with SCOPE, he was strangely remiss. If he did know SCOPE, why was he feigning ignorance?

Barbara Osborn is another who thought Parks’ Who-Are-These-People? stance a bit odd.

Osborn is the Communications Director for the Liberty Hill Foundation, one of the organizations that has repeatedly given SCOPE grants. She is also the person who first brought the SCOPE/Parks situation to my attention.

“SCOPE is one of the most effective community organizing entities in Los Angeles,” Barbara told me “They have been an extraordinarily effective in their get out the vote effort in South LA. So how could Bernard Parks not know who they were? ”

Whatever the case, SCOPE set about rectifying the situation. On November 4, the day after they got the notice from General Services, they sent their own letter to Parks’ council office inquiring about the eviction, and dutifully followed up with three phone calls in the days to follow.

No one ever got back to them. No return letter. No calls. No emails. Nada.

Curious, Thigpenn and Smith also checked to find out if they could find any evidence that their building was up for sale, was to be placed up for sale, or if anyone had expressed interest in buying the building.

They found nothing. “And we’ve never been approached to see if we wanted to buy the building,” said Thigpenn. As nearly as they could tell, he said, the sales ploy was “a complete fabrication.”

So with still no reply from Parks’ office, SCOPE did what community organizers do. They began organizing. They called friends and allies to see if they could turn things around or, at the least, work out some kind of compromise. They also put in place an organization plan in case the front door approach didn’t work.

Word of the situation got around,
and various well-placed friends of the councilman reportedly contacted Parks to warn that this whole eviction thing was wrong-headed.

SCOPE also hand delivered a comprehensive package to Parks’ office explaining the details of all of SCOPE’s programs.

The result?

SCOPE got a new eviction notice saying that now they had to be out in 30 days, not 60. Again there was no explanation.

Seeing no other alternative, SCOPE pulled the trigger on their plan. Emails and calls were launched.

(Never try to out-organize a group of experienced community organizers.)

Meanwhile, SCOPE and their supporters began wonder if Bernard Parks had some kind of personal beef with the organization. But, if so, what was it? While they are big in GOTV, SCOPE has the reputation for being resolutely nonpartisan, said Barbara Osborn.

There was, however, one teensy weensy thing that some suspected might indirectly be bugging Councilman Parks: Last Spring, Anthony Thigpenn took a leave of absence from the organization and went to work for a political organization that supported Mark Ridley-Thomas in the County Sups race against Bernard Parks.

So would Parks really use his office to get back at someone who had worked off-the-clock for the election of his political rival?

One would hope not.

Yet, there was the matter of the September 18 interview that Herb Wesson III, the former field director/campaign manager for Parks, gave to the Los Angeles WAVE’s Betty Pleasant. Wesson (who is the son of City Councilman Herb Wesson) recently quit the campaign in a rather noisy exit, and then told Pleasant that he left specifically because of Parks’ tendency to pursue vendettas.

(As Kevin Roderick pointed out at LAObserved, Pleasant is an admitted Ridley-Thomas fan, a fact that should be kept in mind as we attempt to untangle motives here.)

According to Pleasant, Wesson said he was and is still extremely upset about Parks’ attacks on SEIU labor leader Tyrone Freeman and others—including SCOPE’s Thigpenn.

“And now he’s going after Anthony Thigpenn, one of my best friends with whom I’ve worked closely for most of my life,” Wesson added. “Parks is obsessed about getting Anthony because of Anthony’s association with Mark. Because of his grassroots activities, Anthony has been associated with almost everybody involved in all forms of community activism — including me, and an attack on Anthony is more than I can stand.

Oh.

Listen. There may be a perfectly innocent explaination for all this. But if Parks is NOT trying to yank SCOPE’s building to get back at Anthony Thigpenn, now would be a good time for him to explain himself.

My calls and email to Parks’ spokespeople have thus far gone unreturned.

In the meantime, SCOPEs organizing and outreach paid off. Late yesterday afternoon they got a notice rescinding the eviction. “We understand that the mayor’s office called General Services,” said Thigpenn.

In other words, the eviction is over.

Councilman Parks does have the option of taking his would-be eviction of SCOPE to the entire City Council to see if they’ll go along with it.

Personal note to Bernard Parks: Whatever your reasoning, please don’t.

7 Comments

  • The eviction might have been something that is simply explained. The current push for more revenue generation for the city (at the behest of Mayor Tony V.) could have caused a general review of conditions, including property owned by city and rented with the money-losing terms.

    A sale of “surplus” property might have been a reasonable decision but the impact of the eviction it required was not given needed consideration. And it’s also possible that the Supervisor’s race was a factor to influencing a decision to take back the property and end the $1 per year sweetheart rent deal. Obviously, political influence was present to get the mayor to get involved.

    Whatever the reasons, you can bet that Mark Ridley-Thomas must be pleased. He may even be the one who pulled strings through his friend, Mayor Tony V., to back off on the eviction.

  • In reading this articile it is clear this eviction has nothing todowith income for the city of Los Angeles. This simply points out the attitude of Mr. Parks towards the community he is elected to serve. The timing and the failure to respond is the standard mode of operation of the former Chief of Police. The Federal Government had to come in to make him do the correct thing in the investigation of what he calls his Police Department. The mean spirited attempt to take the focus off the most important event in Political history is very clear. This organization is responsible for encouraging people to vote, not who to vote for as a candidate. It is the method of Councilman Bernard Parks to take advantage of the photo opportunity and plead ignorance to issues of his back room politics. Since he says he doesn’t know what Scope does right in his council district, perhaps County Board of Supervisors puts him in way over his head.

  • If you can win the Board of County Supervisors on your track record, why spend your time on this kind of politics.
    The people that do not share your method of business should not be subjected to the use of power from your position as Councilman. I live in the 8th District and I support the work Scope is doing in our community. If income for the City of Los Angeles is your focus, why not work on getting some jobs back in the 8th district. Just as a side note, how many real issues did you push aside to get to this eviction. I am certain the homeless condition and the unemployment rate must have been somewhere in your list of areas of importance. I certainly don’t want to ommitt the foster care or gang violence in your district. This list goes on, but you decide to focus on the eviction of an extremely successful organization that brings Black people, Hispanic people and poor people to a position of hope. Shame on you Bernard Parks.

  • if this were just a result of the city trying to get funds by dumping non-profits out of city facilities, we would hear about other non-profits facing eviction, right? so clearly, this is just Parks being a vindictive strong arm. he doesn’t even seem to do that well.

  • ALL THIS IS NOT EVEN ABOUT EVICTIONS IT’S ABOUT POWER
    I SAY JUST DO YOUR JOB ALL THIS WOULD GO AWAY
    AND AS FOR SCOPE AT LEAST THEY CARE ABOUT THE PEOPLE
    IN THE COMMUINTY. AND THEY DON’T GIVE OUT WRONG INFORMATION.

  • To the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate:

    As economists, we want to express to Congress our great concern for the plan proposed by Treasury Secretary Paulson to deal with the financial crisis. We are well aware of the difficulty of the current financial situation and we agree with the need for bold action to ensure that the financial system continues to function. We see three fatal pitfalls in the currently proposed plan:

    1) Its fairness. The plan is a subsidy to investors at taxpayers’ expense. Investors who took risks to earn profits must also bear the losses. Not every business failure carries systemic risk. The government can ensure a well-functioning financial industry, able to make new loans to creditworthy borrowers, without bailing out particular investors and institutions whose choices proved unwise.

    2) Its ambiguity. Neither the mission of the new agency nor its oversight are clear. If taxpayers are to buy illiquid and opaque assets from troubled sellers, the terms, occasions, and methods of such purchases must be crystal clear ahead of time and carefully monitored afterwards.

    3) Its long-term effects. If the plan is enacted, its effects will be with us for a generation. For all their recent troubles, America’s dynamic and innovative private capital markets have brought the nation unparalleled prosperity. Fundamentally weakening those markets in order to calm short-run disruptions is desperately short-sighted.

    For these reasons we ask Congress not to rush, to hold appropriate hearings, and to carefully consider the right course of action, and to wisely determine the future of the financial industry and the U.S. economy for years to come.

    Signed (updated at 9/25/2008 8:30AM CT)

    Acemoglu Daron (Massachussets Institute of Technology)
    Adler Michael (Columbia University)
    Admati Anat R. (Stanford University)
    Alexis Marcus (Northwestern University)
    Alvarez Fernando (University of Chicago)
    Andersen Torben (Northwestern University)
    Baliga Sandeep (Northwestern University)
    Banerjee Abhijit V. (Massachussets Institute of Technology)
    Barankay Iwan (University of Pennsylvania)
    Barry Brian (University of Chicago)
    Bartkus James R. (Xavier University of Louisiana)
    Becker Charles M. (Duke University)
    Becker Robert A. (Indiana University)
    Beim David (Columbia University)
    Berk Jonathan (Stanford University)
    Bisin Alberto (New York University)
    Bittlingmayer George (University of Kansas)
    Boldrin Michele (Washington University)
    Brooks Taggert J. (University of Wisconsin)
    Brynjolfsson Erik (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
    Buera Francisco J. (UCLA)
    Camp Mary Elizabeth (Indiana University)
    Carmel Jonathan (University of Michigan)
    Carroll Christopher (Johns Hopkins University)
    Cassar Gavin (University of Pennsylvania)
    Chaney Thomas (University of Chicago)
    Chari Varadarajan V. (University of Minnesota)
    Chauvin Keith W. (University of Kansas)
    Chintagunta Pradeep K. (University of Chicago)
    Christiano Lawrence J. (Northwestern University)
    Cochrane John (University of Chicago)
    Coleman John (Duke University)
    Constantinides George M. (University of Chicago)
    Crain Robert (UC Berkeley)
    Culp Christopher (University of Chicago)
    Da Zhi (University of Notre Dame)
    Davis Morris (University of Wisconsin)
    De Marzo Peter (Stanford University)
    Dubé Jean-Pierre H. (University of Chicago)
    Edlin Aaron (UC Berkeley)
    Eichenbaum Martin (Northwestern University)
    Ely Jeffrey (Northwestern University)
    Eraslan Hülya K. K.(Johns Hopkins University)
    Faulhaber Gerald (University of Pennsylvania)
    Feldmann Sven (University of Melbourne)
    Fernandez-Villaverde Jesus (University of Pennsylvania)
    Fohlin Caroline (Johns Hopkins University)
    Fox Jeremy T. (University of Chicago)
    Frank Murray Z.(University of Minnesota)
    Frenzen Jonathan (University of Chicago)
    Fuchs William (University of Chicago)
    Fudenberg Drew (Harvard University)
    Gabaix Xavier (New York University)
    Gao Paul (Notre Dame University)
    Garicano Luis (University of Chicago)
    Gerakos Joseph J. (University of Chicago)
    Gibbs Michael (University of Chicago)
    Glomm Gerhard (Indiana University)
    Goettler Ron (University of Chicago)
    Goldin Claudia (Harvard University)
    Gordon Robert J. (Northwestern University)
    Greenstone Michael (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
    Guadalupe Maria (Columbia University)
    Guerrieri Veronica (University of Chicago)
    Hagerty Kathleen (Northwestern University)
    Hamada Robert S. (University of Chicago)
    Hansen Lars (University of Chicago)
    Harris Milton (University of Chicago)
    Hart Oliver (Harvard University)
    Hazlett Thomas W. (George Mason University)
    Heaton John (University of Chicago)
    Heckman James (University of Chicago – Nobel Laureate)
    Henderson David R. (Hoover Institution)
    Henisz, Witold (University of Pennsylvania)
    Hertzberg Andrew (Columbia University)
    Hite Gailen (Columbia University)
    Hitsch Günter J. (University of Chicago)
    Hodrick Robert J. (Columbia University)
    Hopenhayn Hugo (UCLA)
    Hurst Erik (University of Chicago)
    Imrohoroglu Ayse (University of Southern California)
    Isakson Hans (University of Northern Iowa)
    Israel Ronen (London Business School)
    Jaffee Dwight M. (UC Berkeley)
    Jagannathan Ravi (Northwestern University)
    Jenter Dirk (Stanford University)
    Jones Charles M. (Columbia Business School)
    Kaboski Joseph P. (Ohio State University)
    Kahn Matthew (UCLA)
    Kaplan Ethan (Stockholm University)
    Karolyi, Andrew (Ohio State University)
    Kashyap Anil (University of Chicago)
    Keim Donald B (University of Pennsylvania)
    Ketkar Suhas L (Vanderbilt University)
    Kiesling Lynne (Northwestern University)
    Klenow Pete (Stanford University)
    Koch Paul (University of Kansas)
    Kocherlakota Narayana (University of Minnesota)
    Koijen Ralph S.J. (University of Chicago)
    Kondo Jiro (Northwestern University)
    Korteweg Arthur (Stanford University)
    Kortum Samuel (University of Chicago)
    Krueger Dirk (University of Pennsylvania)
    Ledesma Patricia (Northwestern University)
    Lee Lung-fei (Ohio State University)
    Leeper Eric M. (Indiana University)
    Leuz Christian (University of Chicago)
    Levine David I.(UC Berkeley)
    Levine David K.(Washington University)
    Levy David M. (George Mason University)
    Linnainmaa Juhani (University of Chicago)
    Lott John R. Jr. (University of Maryland)
    Lucas Robert (University of Chicago – Nobel Laureate)
    Luttmer Erzo G.J. (University of Minnesota)
    Manski Charles F. (Northwestern University)
    Martin Ian (Stanford University)
    Mayer Christopher (Columbia University)
    Mazzeo Michael (Northwestern University)
    McDonald Robert (Northwestern University)
    Meadow Scott F. (University of Chicago)
    Mehra Rajnish (UC Santa Barbara)
    Mian Atif (University of Chicago)
    Middlebrook Art (University of Chicago)
    Miguel Edward (UC Berkeley)
    Miravete Eugenio J. (University of Texas at Austin)
    Miron Jeffrey (Harvard University)
    Moretti Enrico (UC Berkeley)
    Moriguchi Chiaki (Northwestern University)
    Moro Andrea (Vanderbilt University)
    Morse Adair (University of Chicago)
    Mortensen Dale T. (Northwestern University)
    Mortimer Julie Holland (Harvard University)
    Muralidharan Karthik (UC San Diego)
    Nanda Dhananjay (University of Miami)
    Nevo Aviv (Northwestern University)
    Ohanian Lee (UCLA)
    Pagliari Joseph (University of Chicago)
    Papanikolaou Dimitris (Northwestern University)
    Parker Jonathan (Northwestern University)
    Paul Evans (Ohio State University)
    Pejovich Svetozar (Steve) (Texas A&M University)
    Peltzman Sam (University of Chicago)
    Perri Fabrizio (University of Minnesota)
    Phelan Christopher (University of Minnesota)
    Piazzesi Monika (Stanford University)
    Piskorski Tomasz (Columbia University)
    Rampini Adriano (Duke University)
    Reagan Patricia (Ohio State University)
    Reich Michael (UC Berkeley)
    Reuben Ernesto (Northwestern University)
    Roberts Michael (University of Pennsylvania)
    Robinson David (Duke University)
    Rogers Michele (Northwestern University)
    Rotella Elyce (Indiana University)
    Ruud Paul (Vassar College)
    Safford Sean (University of Chicago)
    Sandbu Martin E. (University of Pennsylvania)
    Sapienza Paola (Northwestern University)
    Savor Pavel (University of Pennsylvania)
    Scharfstein David (Harvard University)
    Seim Katja (University of Pennsylvania)
    Seru Amit (University of Chicago)
    Shang-Jin Wei (Columbia University)
    Shimer Robert (University of Chicago)
    Shore Stephen H. (Johns Hopkins University)
    Siegel Ron (Northwestern University)
    Smith David C. (University of Virginia)
    Smith Vernon L.(Chapman University- Nobel Laureate)
    Sorensen Morten (Columbia University)
    Spiegel Matthew (Yale University)
    Stevenson Betsey (University of Pennsylvania)
    Stokey Nancy (University of Chicago)
    Strahan Philip (Boston College)
    Strebulaev Ilya (Stanford University)
    Sufi Amir (University of Chicago)
    Tabarrok Alex (George Mason University)
    Taylor Alan M. (UC Davis)
    Thompson Tim (Northwestern University)
    Tschoegl Adrian E. (University of Pennsylvania)
    Uhlig Harald (University of Chicago)
    Ulrich, Maxim (Columbia University)
    Van Buskirk Andrew (University of Chicago)
    Veronesi Pietro (University of Chicago)
    Vissing-Jorgensen Annette (Northwestern University)
    Wacziarg Romain (UCLA)
    Weill Pierre-Olivier (UCLA)
    Williamson Samuel H. (Miami University)
    Witte Mark (Northwestern University)
    Wolfers Justin (University of Pennsylvania)
    Woutersen Tiemen (Johns Hopkins University)
    Zingales Luigi (University of Chicago)
    Zitzewitz Eric (Dartmouth College)

  • I thought that elected officials were suppose to support and help their constituents. The reputation of SCOPE and the great work that it has performed in South LA should be awarded and given much thanks by Mr. Parks. He definitely does not respect or care about the people in his district. SCOPE has been a positive leader and it has helped so many of Parks’ constituents to empower themselves. Parks is wrong. People have seen him for his true self and because he is losing the race to Ridley-Thomas,the true colors are showing.Parks does not and has not listened to the people in the 8th district. He does what he wants to do and those decisions have not helped his district. HE IS WRONG to want to evict one of the most caring and most outstanding organizations ever established. He is misusing his power. These are the types of politicians we do not need. Parks is selfish and vindictive. When things do not go his way, he will try to find a way to get back at you.

    Mr. Parks, get out of politics. This is not a platform where one can be a dictator. It will not work this time.
    Peace.

Leave a Comment