Comments on: Why I Heart (and fear) the Anti-Evolutionist—and you should too

By: Woody

Woody — Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:57:31 +0000

I made that comment for your benefit, reg, after you made a statement about such things above. Wouldn’t want to disappoint you.

reg: But donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t act like your ad hominem rants are anything other than a smokescreen for incredibly flawed argument.

Should we say “projecting?”

By: reg

reg — Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:18:52 +0000

Like a bad penny…

Woody Says (at Marc Cooper’s):
November 30th, 2007 at 1:35 pm
Workers Held Hostage At Clinton Office In N.H.
Man With Bomb Holding Campaign Volunteers

DidnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t Stalin create crimes and blame his opponents? And, oh yeah, Vince Foster.

By: reg

reg — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 23:59:07 +0000

go screw yourself, maggie. you dragged my name into your hysterics on successive threads, without once unburdening yourself of a substantive thought. Take your crazy “Che Guevara” rants in response to quite coherent criticisms of specific comments you’ve made and stick them where “the moon don’t shine”, as Dick Cavett so elegantly put it. If you need to rave on about my lack of a college education in order to inflate your self-regard and allege a superior intellect and/or refinement – all the while engaging in ridiculous invective – it proves you’re a classless, tasteless, insecure individual. I said that one of your specific statements was crazy – in response to your own “nutcase” brief against Rosa Brooks. Your statement was, in fact, “crazy” – absolutely indefensible as a rational assessment of the issue at hand. If you want to reel it back and explain why what you said made even a shred of sense, I would welcome the opportunity to once again point out how baseless and bizarre your comments were. But don’t act like your ad hominem rants are anything other than a smokescreen for incredibly flawed argument.

By: maggie

maggie — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:40:23 +0000

reg, stop dragging me into your exhaustingly tedious, spiteful and pointless diatribes, all of which reflect your being “unburdened by a college education,” and therefore, the ability to either organize your thoughts logically or respect the right of others to express theirs without spewing venom at them. I NEVER started an attack on you, it’s always you — in blogging and in person, I stay away from such nasty, low-class individuals because no good ever comes of engaging them/ you.

By: reg

reg — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:48:47 +0000

That was purely descriptive. The truth will out.

By: Woody

Woody — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:31:07 +0000

reg: I will defer any further characterization because your knee-jerk reductionism, petty biases and logical lapses are too obvious. Will leave the serial and crude ad hominem invective to you and Maggie.

How soon we forget. It only took forty-four minutes for reg to forget his pledge.

He’ll teach Napa State Hospital to throw open its exit gates.

By: "reg"

"reg" — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:56:33 +0000

sorry – that was supposed to be “Hillary killed Vince Foster”.

By: "reg"

"reg" — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:55:26 +0000

I called your reductionist approach to the world “knee-jerk” because it obviously is. There are qujite a few conservatives who are intelligent, can think critically, don’t trade in crackpot bullshit and encompass a view of the world beyond simple prejudice and mindless invective. You don’t happen to be one of them. You represent an unadulterated strain of the current corruption of conservatism by vile opportunists and cranks like Ann Coulter, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and the “Hillary called Vince Foster” crowd. Your bizarre injection of no less than Josef Stalin (!) into numerous attacks on me is proof enough that you inhabit some political netherworld that has little or no connection to reality. Kind of like Maggie dragging some alleged connection to Che Quevara into the mix when I call her on dubbing Fareed Zakaria “moronic” because he doesn’t believe Iran is about to take over the world. This is very sorry stuff. Normal folk would be ashamed to descend into this kind of stuff. You happen to be shameless. It’s of absolutely no consequence except that it DOES drive me crazy when I see people making such agressive asses of themselves. That’s “my bad” and if I were less neurotic I’d not even bother with anyone who is consistently so ridiculous, predictable and – in the context of rational discourse among adults – worthless.

By: Woody

Woody — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:19:44 +0000

reg, since you don’t accept any sources which disagree with you, then you have taken away 90% of what I could use. And exactly what does your great concern over Clinton and, now, Bush have to do with the primary point of CNN loading up the Republican debate with questions from Democratic activists? Nothing. And, it’s hilarious that you would call a conservative “knee-jerk” and then smugly say that you won’t engage in ad hominem attacks. Go back to the farm.

By: "reg"

"reg" — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:11:47 +0000

Woody – time and time again you expose yourself. You can’t bolster your arguments with evidence. I will defer any further characterization because your knee-jerk reductionism, petty biases and logical lapses are too obvious. Will leave the serial and crude ad hominem invective to you and Maggie.