<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zell, the LA Times &amp; Death by a Thousand (Paper) Cuts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://witnessla.com/los-angeles-times/2008/admin/la-times-death-by-a-thousand-paper-cuts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://witnessla.com/los-angeles-times/2008/admin/la-times-death-by-a-thousand-paper-cuts/</link>
	<description>street news, views and stories of justice and injustice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:52:27 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://witnessla.com/los-angeles-times/2008/admin/la-times-death-by-a-thousand-paper-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-16997</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://witnessla.com/los-angeles-times/2008/admin/la-times-death-by-a-thousand-paper-cuts/#comment-16997</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a quality site for journalists....The Huffington Post.
&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/13/obama-gop-trying-to-paint_n_106996.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Obama: GOP Trying To Paint Michelle And I As &quot;Too Black&quot;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;

It&#039;s bad enough for a candidate to end his campaign slogan in a preposition.  Now, he&#039;s portrayed as not knowing the difference between the subject and an object of a sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a quality site for journalists&#8230;.The Huffington Post.<br />
<b><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/13/obama-gop-trying-to-paint_n_106996.html" rel="nofollow">Obama: GOP Trying To Paint Michelle And I As &#8220;Too Black&#8221;</a></b></p>
<p>It&#8217;s bad enough for a candidate to end his campaign slogan in a preposition.  Now, he&#8217;s portrayed as not knowing the difference between the subject and an object of a sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://witnessla.com/los-angeles-times/2008/admin/la-times-death-by-a-thousand-paper-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-16996</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://witnessla.com/los-angeles-times/2008/admin/la-times-death-by-a-thousand-paper-cuts/#comment-16996</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The major networks donâ€™t warn us when liberals are about to ruin our nation&lt;/i&gt;

What a typically asinine comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The major networks donâ€™t warn us when liberals are about to ruin our nation</i></p>
<p>What a typically asinine comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://witnessla.com/los-angeles-times/2008/admin/la-times-death-by-a-thousand-paper-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-16995</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://witnessla.com/los-angeles-times/2008/admin/la-times-death-by-a-thousand-paper-cuts/#comment-16995</guid>
		<description>The major networks don&#039;t warn us when liberals are about to ruin our nation.  That&#039;s worse than Randy Michaels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The major networks don&#8217;t warn us when liberals are about to ruin our nation.  That&#8217;s worse than Randy Michaels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://witnessla.com/los-angeles-times/2008/admin/la-times-death-by-a-thousand-paper-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-16994</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://witnessla.com/los-angeles-times/2008/admin/la-times-death-by-a-thousand-paper-cuts/#comment-16994</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s what broadcasting in the public interest means, Woody and &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minot,_North_Dakota#Radio&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;here&#039;s where Clear Channel under Randy Michaels failed&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Clear Channel Communications was blamed for placing its stations on &#039;autopilot&#039; and resulting failure to warn area residents not to go outside when an ammonia tanker derailed on 18 January 2002. Clear Channel owned all of the commercial radio stations in Minot at the time. One man died and dozens were injured attempting to flee the area while Clear Channel continued to play their satellite feeds.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s not broadcasting in the public interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what broadcasting in the public interest means, Woody and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minot,_North_Dakota#Radio" rel="nofollow"><b>here&#8217;s where Clear Channel under Randy Michaels failed</b></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Clear Channel Communications was blamed for placing its stations on &#8216;autopilot&#8217; and resulting failure to warn area residents not to go outside when an ammonia tanker derailed on 18 January 2002. Clear Channel owned all of the commercial radio stations in Minot at the time. One man died and dozens were injured attempting to flee the area while Clear Channel continued to play their satellite feeds.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s not broadcasting in the public interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://witnessla.com/los-angeles-times/2008/admin/la-times-death-by-a-thousand-paper-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-16993</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://witnessla.com/los-angeles-times/2008/admin/la-times-death-by-a-thousand-paper-cuts/#comment-16993</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And who gets to decide what is in the â€œpublic interest?â€&lt;/i&gt;

The FCC when the license comes up for renewal.

Lots of strawmen there, Woody. I didn&#039;t mention the Fairness Doctrine. Mario Cuomo opposes the renewal of the Fairness Doctrine.

I worked in the broadcasting industry for nearly twenty years, Woody. Randy Michaels has a lousy reputation amongst independent local radio operators. He represents everything bad in broadcasting: the homogenization of radio and mediocritization of television.

In your typical peckerwood fashion, you attempt to tar me with an empty brush. Jackass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And who gets to decide what is in the â€œpublic interest?â€</i></p>
<p>The FCC when the license comes up for renewal.</p>
<p>Lots of strawmen there, Woody. I didn&#8217;t mention the Fairness Doctrine. Mario Cuomo opposes the renewal of the Fairness Doctrine.</p>
<p>I worked in the broadcasting industry for nearly twenty years, Woody. Randy Michaels has a lousy reputation amongst independent local radio operators. He represents everything bad in broadcasting: the homogenization of radio and mediocritization of television.</p>
<p>In your typical peckerwood fashion, you attempt to tar me with an empty brush. Jackass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://witnessla.com/los-angeles-times/2008/admin/la-times-death-by-a-thousand-paper-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-16988</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://witnessla.com/los-angeles-times/2008/admin/la-times-death-by-a-thousand-paper-cuts/#comment-16988</guid>
		<description>RP:  &lt;i&gt;The Communications Act is clear: broadcasters are licensed to broadcast in the public interest.&lt;/i&gt;

And who gets to decide what is in the &quot;public interest?&quot;  You?  Do you favor restoring the &quot;Fairness Doctrine?&quot;  Here&#039;s the take on that by another liberals:  &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://red-state.blogspot.com/2008/06/how-fair-fairness-doctrine.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Talk Radio, Fairness, and the Common Good&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;

Even if it&#039;s not conservative, even &quot;bad journalists&quot; have a right to publish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RP:  <i>The Communications Act is clear: broadcasters are licensed to broadcast in the public interest.</i></p>
<p>And who gets to decide what is in the &#8220;public interest?&#8221;  You?  Do you favor restoring the &#8220;Fairness Doctrine?&#8221;  Here&#8217;s the take on that by another liberals:  <b><a href="http://red-state.blogspot.com/2008/06/how-fair-fairness-doctrine.html" rel="nofollow">Talk Radio, Fairness, and the Common Good</a></b></p>
<p>Even if it&#8217;s not conservative, even &#8220;bad journalists&#8221; have a right to publish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://witnessla.com/los-angeles-times/2008/admin/la-times-death-by-a-thousand-paper-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-16985</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://witnessla.com/los-angeles-times/2008/admin/la-times-death-by-a-thousand-paper-cuts/#comment-16985</guid>
		<description>When I read that Randy Michaels was COO of Tribune, I knew that the fine newspaper chain was screwed with a capital S.

Michaels, who used to run Jacor and Clear Channel Radio is largely crddited with turning local radio into a sewer. it was Michaels who, with Clear Channel had the operations of several combined into one, and often had them run remotely with no personnel there, in violation of FCC regulations.

Under Michaels, Clear Channel effectively abandoned local programming outside of large metro areas. No less a Republican than Herbert Hoover stated that the airwaves belong to the public. The Communications Act is clear: broadcasters are licensed to broadcast in the public interest. Michaels response has effectively been an upraised middle finger.

Zell is bad news; Michaels is even worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I read that Randy Michaels was COO of Tribune, I knew that the fine newspaper chain was screwed with a capital S.</p>
<p>Michaels, who used to run Jacor and Clear Channel Radio is largely crddited with turning local radio into a sewer. it was Michaels who, with Clear Channel had the operations of several combined into one, and often had them run remotely with no personnel there, in violation of FCC regulations.</p>
<p>Under Michaels, Clear Channel effectively abandoned local programming outside of large metro areas. No less a Republican than Herbert Hoover stated that the airwaves belong to the public. The Communications Act is clear: broadcasters are licensed to broadcast in the public interest. Michaels response has effectively been an upraised middle finger.</p>
<p>Zell is bad news; Michaels is even worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://witnessla.com/los-angeles-times/2008/admin/la-times-death-by-a-thousand-paper-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-16956</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://witnessla.com/los-angeles-times/2008/admin/la-times-death-by-a-thousand-paper-cuts/#comment-16956</guid>
		<description>When businessmen run the papers, journalists are offended that profits are more important than them.  But, if journalists ran the papers, there would be no profits and, eventually, no jobs and no papers.  Journalists are showing what snobs and elitists that they can be, which is interesting for people who know little about running profitable businesses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When businessmen run the papers, journalists are offended that profits are more important than them.  But, if journalists ran the papers, there would be no profits and, eventually, no jobs and no papers.  Journalists are showing what snobs and elitists that they can be, which is interesting for people who know little about running profitable businesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
