Saturday, December 20, 2014
street news, views and stories of justice and injustice
Follow me on Twitter

Search WitnessLA:

Recent Posts

Categories

Archives

Meta


Looking Back at the Coverage of Arnold’s Alleged Serial Groping

May 18th, 2011 by Celeste Fremon


Tracy Webber of Pro Publica, formerly a Pulitzer winner from the LA Times
, has posted an essay about what it was like, in 2003, to be thrust into reporting on the growing story that would-be governor Arnold Schwarzenegger had serially groped a lot of women who worked on his films. In the light of the Mr. Shwarzenegger’s most recent admissions, not to mention the whole, awful DSK matter, it is interesting to read Webber’s recollections and musings on the subject of “When Powerful Men Cross Lines.

She remembers, among other things, how much fury and criticism the reporting on Arnold’s purported gropings engendered—not toward Arnold, but toward the journalists, the paper, and the women who had, despite their trepidations, agreed to tell their stories.

Eventually 10,000 readers would cancel their subscriptions to the Times.

Reading Weber’s essay, I remembered how then LA Weekly columnist Bill Bradley would accuse the LA Times editors of being willing pawns of “democratic operatives.” I also recalled Jill Stewart writing in the Daily News that the Times deliberately hold the story so that the charges could not be refuted before the election. Schwarzenegger-friendly local radio hosts would cavalierly and falsely trash the reputation of a stuntwoman who was one of those who said that Arnold had molested her. (Nikki Finke, who reported on the dirty tricks against the woman, was one of the few who went against the Schwarzenegger defending, Times-trashing current.)

It was repeatedly suggested that the women’s testimonies were exaggerated, that they were no big deal. But even after the Times stopped working on the story, women kept coming forward, very, very tentatively to tell their own Arnold stories. I know because some of the women contacted me because this or that person told them that I was a trustworthy journalist. I remember I connected up two of those women—both very credible sounding—to one of the other Times reporters working with Weber on the project, Charlie Ornstein, I think it was. But by that time, the storm of criticism had rained down on the paper and they had all but pulled the plug on additional work on the story.

Here’s a clip from Weber’s essay:

The week’s news about the sexual conduct of politically powerful men gives me a queasy feeling of déjà vu.

As the French agonize over whether Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s star power quashed past allegations, I can respond cynically: Yes, that probably happened. But we should not automatically assume that timelier reporting about Strauss-Kahn’s sexually aggressive behavior (including an alleged violent incident in 2002) would have slowed the 62-year old Socialist’s march towards the French presidency.

I speak from experience.

Eight years ago I was dragged scowling and complaining into an investigation of allegations that Arnold Schwarzenegger – the leading candidate for governor of California – had sexually harassed and molested women, including those who worked on his movies.

A team of reporters for The Los Angeles Times, where I then worked, had been pursuing the story for weeks and were about to publish a first piece. With the election days away, I was pulled in. At the time I was deep into an investigative project about a troubled Los Angeles hospital that had a history of harming or even killing its patients. Digging into The Terminator’s salacious back story seemed a tawdry detour…..

Steve Lopez also has a look back at the 2003 groping stories—and the reaction to them.


NOTE: Light posting this morning due to a pile of conflicts and a very sad funeral I must attend. However it’s worth mentioning that Steve Cooley has officially said he won’t seek reelection, and officially endorsed firmly someone other than Carmen Trutanich. More on all this as time goes along.

Posted in Life in general, Los Angeles Times | 6 Comments »

6 Responses

  1. Rebel Girl Says:

    A long memory is the most radical thing in America – I think Clare Spark said that. I like your long memory.

  2. Answering The Question Says:

    Now, like John Edwards, he’ll just fade away and we won’t have to hear any more of his b.s.

  3. don quixote Says:

    Why is it that when these old, horny, powerful, men get busted for allowing their little heads to take control of their big heads, it is usually for actions that are not only “criminal” or morally repugnant, but almost comedic when these perversions are made public. The list goes on and on but Maureen Dowd in yesterdays NYT pretty much nails it.

    And what was up with Maria Schriber? Why did she put up with Ahnolds crap for so long? She seems like a fairly intelligent person from a powerful family, whoa!, wait a minute, weren’t the Kennedy men described as “like dogs who had to piss on every fire hydrant” when it came to seducing the various women around them, maybe Maria thought Arnold’s actions with women was some kind of normal man thing.

    Powerful and Primitive
    By MAUREEN DOWD
    Published: May 17, 2011

    “— a crazed, rutting, wrinkly old satyr charging naked out of a bathroom, lunging at her and dragging her around the room, caveman-style.
    Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s reputation as a thrice-married French seducer loses something in the translation”

    See what I mean.

  4. don quixote Says:

    And typically, the “illustrious” “Ben Stein”, writing in American Spectator defends Strauss-Kahn with this well thought out opinion,

    “In what possible way is the price of the hotel room relevant except in every way: this is a case about the hatred of the have-nots for the haves, and that’s what it’s all about”

    Surprise, surprise, from this right wing apologist

  5. clark elliott Says:

    But what is the message our libidinous leaders are presenting here? They have demonstrated that it’s OK to break their vows to their families so where does this leave the people they serve?

  6. Answering The Question Says:

    Whatever happened to believing that two consenting adults engaging in sex acts is a personal, private matter?

    Hmmmm.

Leave a Comment





Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.