Tuesday, December 6, 2016
street news, views and stories of justice and injustice
Follow me on Twitter

Search WitnessLA:

Recent Posts




2 Jurors Replaced at LASD Fed Trial…SCOTUS Clears Way for Conversion Therapy Ban….Booker & Smith Introduce Better Options for Kids Act

July 1st, 2014 by Celeste Fremon


Jurors began deliberations last Tuesday on the obstruction of justice trial in which six members of the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department are accused of deliberately getting in the way of a federal grand jury investigation into widespread brutality and corruption in the LA County jail system.

By Friday afternoon, attorneys and trial watchers speculated optimistically that the jury might have the end of its deliberations at least in sight, and thus could possibly produce a verdict some time Monday.

Then Monday rolled around and all optimism vanished when two jurors were replaced alternates.

The first juror, a woman, was replaced Monday morning after she sent the judge a note resulting in a series of lengthy sidebars between Judge Percy Anderson and the two groups of attorneys involved, the prosecution and the defense.

Although Anderson sealed the content of the note, the reason that the juror needed or wanted to be replaced appeared to be something singular enough that it required animated discussion on the part of judge and lawyers prior Anderson making a final decision on the matter. Hence the sidebars.

Finally at 9:45 a.m., Anderson called the remaining eleven jurors back in and announced to them that an alternate was to replace one of their number. This meant, he explained, that they were now a brand new jury and must begin deliberating all over again as if their previous deliberations had never occurred.

The eleven who’d been at this for more than four days did not look thrilled at this “start your deliberations anew” set of instructions, but they filed out dutifully.

After about a half hour of deliberations the “new” jury sent a note to Anderson wanting to know if they could change their lunch location, which seemed to suggest that they had not yet gotten into any kind of deliberative stride.

Then at 12:30 or so, yet another note. This time from a second juror (also a woman) who, because of some kind of emergent personal situation, needed to be excused permanently right away. The juror appeared to be controlling distress and Judge Anderson excused her without much fuss after thanking her formally but warmly, for her time and service.

In came the rest of the jury members who were, again, told that one of their group was being replaced. This time the alternate juror was a man, disrupting the previous six-six split of males to females on the panel.

The jury was informed that it was now a new new jury, and thus must again “start your deliberations anew…” and so on.

If the panel members looked uncheery before, at this second set of instructions to totally reboot they looked visibly grim. Yet, they also still looked, for the most part, reasonably willing and determined.

With the exception of one last jury note that had something to do with a juror whose boss was getting irritated that he or she had been out so long, the rest of the afternoon was uneventful….

….and without a verdict.


California’s first-of-its-kind law banning “reparative therapies,” which are designed to turn gay kids straight, was passed by the state legislature and signed into law by governor Jerry Brown in fall 2012, but it has yet to take effect because of court challenges by those opposed to the statute.

In August 2013, the 9th Circuit ruled that the practice, which is not supported by the scientific mainstream and has been shown to be damaging to youth, often producing depression and suicidality, was not protected by the First Amendment nor could it be challenged on religious grounds.

The law’s opponents then tried the Supreme Court, which on Monday refused to hear the challenge, thus opening the path for the important ban to finally take effect.

Lisa Leff of the Associated Press has the story Here’s a clip:

The U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way Monday for enforcement of a first-of-its-kind California law that bars psychological counseling aimed at turning gay minors straight.

The justices turned aside a legal challenge brought by supporters of so-called conversion or reparative therapy. Without comment, they let stand an August 2013 appeals court ruling that said the ban covered professional activities that are within the state’s authority to regulate and doesn’t violate the free speech rights of licensed counselors and patients seeking treatment.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last year that California lawmakers properly showed that therapies designed to change sexual orientation for those under the age of 18 were outside the scientific mainstream and have been disavowed by most major medical groups as unproven and potentially dangerous.

“The Supreme Court has cement shut any possible opening to allow further psychological child abuse in California,” state Sen. Ted Lieu, the law’s sponsor, said Monday. “The Court’s refusal to accept the appeal of extreme ideological therapists who practice the quackery of gay conversion therapy is a victory for child welfare, science and basic humane principles.”


Last week, U.S. Senators Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) and Cory Booker (D-N.J.) introduced something called the Better Options for Kids Act, a bill designed to “incentivize states to replace overly harsh school disciplinary actions and juvenile court punishment with bipartisan, evidence-based solutions that save money, enhance public safety, and improve youth outcomes.”

Interestingly, the bill uses existing funding streams to reward states that adopt policies that replace a purely punitive approach with those that improve youth outcomes. As examples, the bill lists:

Limiting court referrals for school-based non-criminal status offenses (truancy, curfew violations, et al)

Incentivizing school district to have clear guidelines regarding the arrest powers of school resource officers on school grounds

Providing training or funds training for school districts to use non-exclusionary discipline. (NOTE: “Exclusionary discipline” means suspensions, expulsions, and other disciplinary practices that keep students out of the classroom.)

Shifting funding formerly dedicated to secure detention for minors into community-based alternatives for incarceration

Adopting a reentry policy for youth leaving correctional facilities that ensures educational continuity and success.

“This bill represents a serious leap forward in the fight to dismantle the school-to-prison pipeline, and to build a smarter, more effective, and more compassionate juvenile justice system” said Cory Booker in a statement announcing the bill’s introduction.

Murphy also stated strong sentiments. “When we lock up a child, not only are we wasting millions of taxpayer dollars, we’re setting him or her up for failure in the long run,” he said. “We need to quit being so irresponsible and facilitate better outcomes for youth.”

After he was elected U.S. Senator, former Newark New Jersey mayor Booker promised to make juvenile justice reform one of his top priorities. The Better Options for Kids Act looks like a promising step in that direction.

We’ll keep an eye on the bill’s progress.

Posted in Civil Liberties, FBI, jail, juvenile justice, LA County Jail, LASD, LGBT, School to Prison Pipeline, Youth at Risk, Zero Tolerance and School Discipline | 15 Comments »

15 Responses

  1. Mutual Assured Destruction Says:

    The department is like a broken vase and Sheriff Scott is foolishly trying to super glue it together instead of throwing away the busted up pieces (executives) and starting over. He has been making Tanakaesque personnel moves that will bring about long term negative effects. We are seeing it in the confusion that was the recent captain movement, the chaos that is the way the most recent lieutenant and sergeant promotions were handled and the whole cruiseship captain’s cap and Eisenhower jacket nonsense. What’s next, motors with sidecars and curbside call boxes?

    Rumors and laughs about the department and it’s executives have become the department line workers’ main forms of entertainment. It’s like a genre within the department. Exhausting cycle after exhausting cycle of hope only ending in despair is what we are left to deal with. Sheriff Scott is no different than Baca and Tanaka. Blinded by the euphoric feeling of those soft wet tongues deep in his rectum all the while his lunch money is being taken and ridiculous moves are being made behind his back.

  2. IT-GUY Says:

    All 6 were just found guilty on all counts.

  3. IT-GUY Says:

    All six were just found guilty.

  4. Old School Says:

    Verdicts in…..TANAKA SIX ALL GUILTY. ALADS did SEXTON a favor by not wanting to represent him. ALADS can minimize damage by doing something for the non- rank deputies and their families.

    The president of ALADS Don Steck should implement something ASAP.
    Now is the time to break the fetters and chain, put your “big boy” boxers on and do the right thing.

    Let the Reps know tomorrow at your meeting. Be a man and break free of your “handler” Floyd Hayhurst.
    The spotlight is on ALADS once again. We all know that the members money is there and that should not be a problem. ALL WILL BE WATCHING.

  5. LATBG Says:

    This just in – all six found guilty by the federal jury. Apparently the jury did not buy the specious argument that the inmate was moved and concealed for his own safety. No one on the department every bought that argument, but it was the only defense available.

    What a tragic outcome for these six, regardless of their personal involvement. They all got led down the path of corruption by the pied piper, Paul Tanaka, and his enabler, Moonbeam. Too bad neither of these fools were man enough to step up to the plate and accept responsibility.

  6. Thanks a lot Says:

    All 6 GUILTY….WOW, just WOW!! And Tanaka and Baca, skate so far. This will be the biggest travesty if Baca and Tanaka are allowed to go unscathed!!


  7. Jack Dawson Says:

    Sad but necessary day for LASD.

    I wonder what they think at ALADs? 0 and 2 with appeals pending… That is going to be costly. Not to mention they are spending money to tell the kid who wanted to pick his own lawyer no.

    Awesome. I bet ole Baca and friends are getting the best money can buy as we speak.

  8. Roy Says:

    All six were convicted today………….

  9. Starlight Scope Says:

    The verdict today is a sad day for the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department. It should also be a wake up call for not only the Sheriff’s Department, but all Law enforcement.
    My advice to newer deputies on the department is to always do the right thing. You won’t be popular, you won’t be ” in the car” or have a drink with boys…., but you will have personal satisfaction and you will keep your job.

    Two major things that I have learned on this department and that is “what to do” and “what not to do”

    Rest in Peace, Former Sheriff Peter J.Pitchess and Gormet Sheriff Sherman Block.

  10. Starlight Scope Says:

    Typo…..Former Sheriff Sherman Block

  11. Roy Bean Says:

    What, no comments? Must be opening the champaign! What a disgrace. Leftist rag!

  12. fx Says:

    Congratulations to Celeste for her outstanding reporting on the problems within the county jail and LASD

  13. Oh Well Says:

    I wonder if the defendants heard anybody say “Fuck the feds” during those clandestine meetings about what was going to be done to thwart their investigation. I wonder if they remember how that made them feel at the time. I wonder how they feel about it now.
    These personnel have lost their careers and are looking at prison time because Baca and Tanaka made a conscious decision to show the feds who the boss was. Only they were wrong. The feds proved to be the chingon big dog on the yard. Either that or Baca and Tanaka didn’t want the feds investigation resulting in an outcome that would make them look bad. Politics. These deputies were nothing more than young, naive, political pawns that Baca and Tanaka were willing to sacrifice.
    Politicians to the core. Both of them. Always have been. Some people wanted to believe Tanaka was a cop first and a politician second. This clusterf#%k proves different. He is a politician first and foremost and he always has been. Those of you who had illusions of grandeur about the man are now faced with cold, hard, undeniable reality. When the chips were down, he claimed he was “out of the loop”, or couldn’t remember much or he “didn’t disagree” but it was somebody else’s idea. Does that sound like a cop or politician? He didn’t “Man up” and the get the backs of the troops that were following his orders. Cop or politician?

    Would Boomer still allow him in his “radio car of trust”?

  14. Time to Clean House Says:

    Well said #9. It’s time for Paul to  pull the plug on his  campaign. Hey Paul and Leroy,  the feds are coming for you. I don’t believe for a minute that pandora’s box is the only charge these guys  will face. 

  15. Sherlockholmes Says:

    MAD: What was the whole cruise ship captain cap and Eisenhower thing about? I didn’t get that.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.